10.02.2013 Views

Regulatory oversight of nuclear safety in Finland. Annual ... - STUK

Regulatory oversight of nuclear safety in Finland. Annual ... - STUK

Regulatory oversight of nuclear safety in Finland. Annual ... - STUK

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4.1 Loviisa NPP<br />

The Loviisa power plant <strong>in</strong>tends to reduce the<br />

releases <strong>of</strong> antimony (Sb-122 and Sb-124) to the<br />

primary circuit and to reduce the activity <strong>of</strong> the<br />

primary circuit and the result<strong>in</strong>g radiation exposure.<br />

The power company <strong>in</strong>tends to change the<br />

material <strong>of</strong> seals <strong>in</strong> the reactor coolant pumps to<br />

an antimony-free alternative (see Section 4.1.4,<br />

Reactor coolant pump seal).<br />

Radiation doses<br />

The collective occupational radiation dose was 0.43<br />

manSv at Loviisa 1 and 0.29 manSv at Loviisa 1.<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the YVL Guide issued by <strong>STUK</strong>, the<br />

threshold for one plant unit’s collective dose averaged<br />

over two successive years is 2.5 manSv per<br />

gigawatt <strong>of</strong> net electrical power. This means a collective<br />

dose value <strong>of</strong> 1.22 manSv per Loviisa plant<br />

unit. This limit value was not exceeded at either<br />

plant unit.<br />

The total time used for annual ma<strong>in</strong>tenance<br />

outages <strong>in</strong> Loviisa was short, and there were few<br />

operations <strong>of</strong> significance for radiation protection,<br />

which resulted <strong>in</strong> the total collective dose be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the lowest ever <strong>in</strong> the history <strong>of</strong> the Loviisa NPP.<br />

The collective occupational radiation doses <strong>of</strong> employees<br />

at the Loviisa NPP were smaller than the<br />

average doses <strong>of</strong> employees work<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> pressurized<br />

water reactors <strong>in</strong> the OECD countries.<br />

The occupational radiation doses <strong>of</strong> NPP workers<br />

mostly accumulated <strong>in</strong> work carried out dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

annual ma<strong>in</strong>tenance outages. The collective occupational<br />

radiation dose caused by work carried out<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g the annual ma<strong>in</strong>tenance outages was 0.40<br />

manSv at Loviisa 1, and 0.25 manSv at Loviisa 2.<br />

The highest <strong>in</strong>dividual radiation dose accumulated<br />

amounted to 4.9 mSv at Loviisa 1, and to 6.1 mSv<br />

at Loviisa 2. The highest <strong>in</strong>dividual dose <strong>in</strong>curred<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g the annual ma<strong>in</strong>tenance outages <strong>of</strong> both<br />

plant units was 7.4 mSv. The highest <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />

dose <strong>in</strong>curred dur<strong>in</strong>g the year was 7.9 mSv.<br />

The <strong>in</strong>dividual radiation dose distribution <strong>of</strong><br />

workers at the Loviisa and Olkiluoto <strong>nuclear</strong> power<br />

plants <strong>in</strong> 2011 is given <strong>in</strong> Appendix 2.<br />

Radioactive releases and environmental<br />

radiation monitor<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>STUK</strong> <strong>in</strong>spected the operation <strong>of</strong> the weather<br />

measurement system and environmental radiation<br />

monitor<strong>in</strong>g network at the Loviisa power plant<br />

site. The <strong>in</strong>struments <strong>of</strong> the weather measurement<br />

<strong>STUK</strong>-B 147<br />

system were found to be operable. The environmental<br />

radiation monitor<strong>in</strong>g network had operated<br />

well apart from a few isolated disturbances. Due<br />

to the age<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> both <strong>of</strong> these systems, the power<br />

plant <strong>in</strong>itiated <strong>in</strong> 2011 the plann<strong>in</strong>g work for upgrad<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the weather measurement system and the<br />

environmental radiation monitor<strong>in</strong>g network.<br />

The radioactive releases <strong>in</strong>to the environment<br />

from the Loviisa <strong>nuclear</strong> power plant were well<br />

below the authorised annual limits <strong>in</strong> 2011. The<br />

releases <strong>of</strong> radioactive noble gases <strong>in</strong>to the air<br />

were approximately 6 TBq (as Kr-85-equivalent<br />

activity), which is approximately 0.03% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

authorised limit. The releases <strong>of</strong> radioactive noble<br />

gases were dom<strong>in</strong>ated by argon-41, i.e. the activation<br />

product <strong>of</strong> argon-40 present <strong>in</strong> the air space<br />

between the reactor pressure vessel and the ma<strong>in</strong><br />

concrete shield. The releases <strong>of</strong> radioactive iod<strong>in</strong>e<br />

isotopes <strong>in</strong>to the air were about 1 MBq (as I-131-<br />

equivalent activity), i.e. approximately 0.0004% <strong>of</strong><br />

the authorised limit. The emissions through the<br />

vent stack also <strong>in</strong>cluded radioactive particulate<br />

matter amount<strong>in</strong>g to 0.1 GBq, tritium amount<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to 0.2 TBq and carbon-14 amount<strong>in</strong>g to approximately<br />

0.3 TBq.<br />

The tritium content <strong>of</strong> liquid effluents released<br />

<strong>in</strong>to the sea was 15 TBq, less than 10% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

release limit. The total activity <strong>of</strong> other nuclides<br />

released <strong>in</strong>to the sea was about 0.2 GBq, which is<br />

In early September 2011, an error was detected<br />

at the Loviisa power plant <strong>in</strong> the way <strong>in</strong> which<br />

radioactive emissions were determ<strong>in</strong>ed. The power<br />

plant had <strong>in</strong>troduced a new gamma activity<br />

measurement system on 11 June 2010, to be used,<br />

among other th<strong>in</strong>gs, for determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the aerosols<br />

and iod<strong>in</strong>e isotopes <strong>in</strong> the emissions released <strong>in</strong>to<br />

the atmosphere. Due to an error discovered <strong>in</strong> the<br />

method used by the new measurement system to<br />

calculate the sampl<strong>in</strong>g air flow, the figures reported<br />

to <strong>STUK</strong> for gamma-active emissions <strong>in</strong>to the<br />

atmosphere had been <strong>in</strong>correct dur<strong>in</strong>g the period<br />

11 June 2010 to 2 September 2011. Hav<strong>in</strong>g discovered<br />

the error, the licensee reported the matter<br />

to <strong>STUK</strong>. <strong>STUK</strong> required the Loviisa power plant<br />

to supply new, corrected figures for the <strong>in</strong>correctly<br />

reported emissions.<br />

The event is described <strong>in</strong> more detail <strong>in</strong><br />

Appendix 3.<br />

43

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!