10.02.2013 Views

Regulatory oversight of nuclear safety in Finland. Annual ... - STUK

Regulatory oversight of nuclear safety in Finland. Annual ... - STUK

Regulatory oversight of nuclear safety in Finland. Annual ... - STUK

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

KAINULAINEN Erja (ed.). <strong>Regulatory</strong> <strong>oversight</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>nuclear</strong> <strong>safety</strong> <strong>in</strong> F<strong>in</strong>land. <strong>Annual</strong> report 2011.<br />

<strong>STUK</strong>-B 147. Hels<strong>in</strong>ki 2012. 108 pp. + Appendices 70 pp.<br />

Management review<br />

The F<strong>in</strong>nish <strong>nuclear</strong> power plants caused no danger to the plant environment or employees<br />

<strong>in</strong> 2011. No events with <strong>safety</strong> implications to the <strong>safety</strong> <strong>of</strong> the environment or people took<br />

place at the plants. The collective radiation doses <strong>of</strong> employees were low and the radioactive<br />

releases <strong>in</strong>to the environment very small. Radioactive waste generated <strong>in</strong> operational<br />

processes at the <strong>nuclear</strong> power plants accumulated as anticipated. Its process<strong>in</strong>g and f<strong>in</strong>al<br />

disposal <strong>in</strong> underground facilities took place <strong>in</strong> a controlled manner.<br />

<strong>STUK</strong>-B 147<br />

Keywords: <strong>nuclear</strong> energy, <strong>nuclear</strong> facility, <strong>nuclear</strong> waste, <strong>nuclear</strong> safeguards, regulatory <strong>oversight</strong>,<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicators<br />

The number <strong>of</strong> events reported to <strong>STUK</strong> was lower than <strong>in</strong> previous years. The underly<strong>in</strong>g<br />

reasons for the events occurr<strong>in</strong>g dur<strong>in</strong>g the year were ma<strong>in</strong>ly related to age<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the<br />

plants. Age<strong>in</strong>g-<strong>in</strong>duced faults were detected at both plants, among others <strong>in</strong> emergency<br />

diesel generators used for ensur<strong>in</strong>g the power supply <strong>of</strong> <strong>safety</strong> systems <strong>in</strong> a situation where<br />

connection to other sources <strong>of</strong> electricity has been lost. Age<strong>in</strong>g-<strong>in</strong>duced faults were also<br />

detected at the Olkiluoto NPP <strong>in</strong> the ma<strong>in</strong> valves <strong>of</strong> the reactor overpressure protection<br />

system. The detected faults have not prevented the operation <strong>of</strong> <strong>safety</strong> functions, but follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the observations, <strong>STUK</strong> required both power companies to <strong>in</strong>vestigate and report<br />

on the sufficiency <strong>of</strong> condition monitor<strong>in</strong>g, preventive ma<strong>in</strong>tenance and management <strong>of</strong><br />

spare parts <strong>of</strong> the <strong>safety</strong> system equipment and structures. Furthermore, <strong>STUK</strong> <strong>in</strong>spected<br />

the spare parts management <strong>of</strong> plants, as well as their condition monitor<strong>in</strong>g and licensee<br />

<strong>in</strong>spection activities dur<strong>in</strong>g the annual ma<strong>in</strong>tenance outages. The <strong>in</strong>spections and operat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

experience show that the Loviisa and Olkiluoto plants have to pay more attention to<br />

the monitor<strong>in</strong>g and management <strong>of</strong> age<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>safety</strong> systems.<br />

At Loviisa and Olkiluoto, modifications required for improv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>safety</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>ued regard<strong>in</strong>g<br />

plant systems, equipment and structures and operat<strong>in</strong>g practices. At Loviisa 1, the suction<br />

stra<strong>in</strong>ers <strong>of</strong> the low-pressure emergency cool<strong>in</strong>g system and conta<strong>in</strong>ment spray<strong>in</strong>g<br />

system, required <strong>in</strong> accident situations, were improved by <strong>in</strong>stall<strong>in</strong>g smaller-mesh stra<strong>in</strong>er<br />

elements. The modification will secure the cool<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> fuel by prevent<strong>in</strong>g loose <strong>in</strong>sulation<br />

materials, for example, from enter<strong>in</strong>g the reactor core through the emergency cool<strong>in</strong>g<br />

system <strong>in</strong> an accident situation. A similar modification was carried out at Loviisa 2 the<br />

year before. The Olkiluoto plant cont<strong>in</strong>ued the modernisation project spann<strong>in</strong>g many years,<br />

aimed at extend<strong>in</strong>g the service life <strong>of</strong> the plant and improv<strong>in</strong>g its availability. Most <strong>of</strong> the<br />

modifications implemented at Olkiluoto 1 <strong>in</strong> 2011 were now implemented at Olkiluoto 2.<br />

TVO also started the work for expand<strong>in</strong>g the spent <strong>nuclear</strong> fuel storage <strong>in</strong> Olkiluoto. At the<br />

same time, the structures <strong>of</strong> the storage facility will be modified to comply with the current<br />

<strong>safety</strong> requirements.<br />

Follow<strong>in</strong>g the Fukushima accident, national <strong>safety</strong> assessments were <strong>in</strong>itiated and implemented<br />

at both pants. They <strong>in</strong>volved assess<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>safety</strong> <strong>of</strong> the plants and their <strong>safety</strong><br />

marg<strong>in</strong>s aga<strong>in</strong>st external threats, such as floods, earthquakes and extremely rare and<br />

severe weather conditions. The assessments also analysed emergency response activities <strong>in</strong><br />

accident situations <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g more than one plant unit, as well as cool<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the reactor and<br />

fuel pools <strong>in</strong> a situation where the plant has lost its power supplies or its normal residual<br />

3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!