Discurso & Sociedad, 3(2) 2009, 224-252249Adriana Bolívar,“¿<strong>Por</strong> qué <strong>no</strong> <strong>te</strong> <strong>callas</strong>”: Los <strong>alcance</strong>s <strong>de</strong> <strong>una</strong> <strong>frase</strong> <strong>en</strong> <strong>el</strong><strong>de</strong>s<strong>en</strong>cu<strong>en</strong>tro___________________________________________________________Bolívar, A. (2008a) “Cachorro <strong>de</strong>l imperio” versus “cachorro <strong>de</strong> Fi<strong>de</strong>l”: losinsultos <strong>en</strong> la política lati<strong>no</strong>americana, Discurso y Sociedad 2(1): 1-38. Revista Multidisciplinaria <strong>de</strong> In<strong>te</strong>rnet, www.dissoc.orgBolívar, A. (2008b) “¿<strong>Por</strong> qué <strong>no</strong> <strong>te</strong> <strong>callas</strong>?” La función <strong>de</strong> lasin<strong>te</strong>rrupciones <strong>en</strong> <strong>el</strong> diálogo político. XVI Congreso <strong>de</strong> la ALFAL,Uruguay, Mon<strong>te</strong>vi<strong>de</strong>o, 18- 21 <strong>de</strong> agosto 2008.Bolívar, A. (2009) ‘Democracia y revolución <strong>en</strong> V<strong>en</strong>ezu<strong>el</strong>a: un análisiscrítico <strong>de</strong>l discurso político <strong>de</strong>s<strong>de</strong> la lingüística <strong>de</strong> corpus.’ Oralia 12,27-54.Bolívar, A. (<strong>en</strong> pr<strong>en</strong>sa) ‘Las disculpas <strong>en</strong> la política lati<strong>no</strong>americana’, <strong>en</strong>F. Orletti y L. Mariottini (eds.), La (<strong>de</strong>scor<strong>te</strong>sía <strong>en</strong> español: ámbitos<strong>te</strong>óricos y metodológicos <strong>de</strong> estudio. Roma: Universidad RomaTre.Charau<strong>de</strong>au, P. (2005) Le discours politi<strong>que</strong>. Les mas<strong>que</strong>s du pouvoir.Paris : Vuibert.Harris, S., Grainger, K., y Mullany, L. (2006) ‘The pragmatics of politicalapologies’, Discourse and Society 12 (4): 451-472.Haverka<strong>te</strong>, H. (1994). La cor<strong>te</strong>sía verbal. Estudio pragmalingüístico.Madrid: Editorial Gredos.Ki<strong>en</strong>pointner, M. (2008) ‘Cor<strong>te</strong>sía, emociones y argum<strong>en</strong>tación’, <strong>en</strong> A.Briz, M. Alb<strong>el</strong>da, J. Contreras y N. Hernán<strong>de</strong>z Flores (eds.) Cor<strong>te</strong>sía yconversación: <strong>de</strong> lo oral a lo escrito. III Congreso In<strong>te</strong>rnacionalEDICE, 25-52. Val<strong>en</strong>cia: Universidad <strong>de</strong> Val<strong>en</strong>cia.Lakoff, R. (2003) “Nine ways of looking at apologies”, <strong>en</strong> D. Schiffrin, D.Tann<strong>en</strong> y H. Hamilton (eds.), 199-204. The Handbook of DiscourseAnalysis. Oxford: Blackw<strong>el</strong>l.Madriz, M.F. (2002) ‘La <strong>no</strong>ción <strong>de</strong> pueblo <strong>en</strong> <strong>el</strong> discurso populista’,Revista Lati<strong>no</strong>americana <strong>de</strong> Estudios <strong>de</strong>l discurso 2(1): 69-92.Madriz, M. F. (2007) La institución <strong>de</strong>l imaginario político <strong>de</strong> la sociedad<strong>de</strong>mocrática v<strong>en</strong>ezolana (1941- 1948). Tesis doctoral. Doctorado <strong>en</strong>Historia. Facultad <strong>de</strong> Humanida<strong>de</strong>s y Educación. Universidad C<strong>en</strong>tral<strong>de</strong> V<strong>en</strong>ezu<strong>el</strong>a.Maingu<strong>en</strong>eau, D. (2006) ‘Unida<strong>de</strong>s tópicas e não tópicas’, <strong>en</strong> D.Maingu<strong>en</strong>au, C<strong>en</strong>as <strong>de</strong> Enunciação, 9-24. Curitiba: Criar Ediçoes.Már<strong>que</strong>z-Rei<strong>te</strong>r, R., y Plac<strong>en</strong>cia, M. E. (2005) Spanish Pragmatics. NewYork: Palgrave Macmillan.Mills, S. (2003) G<strong>en</strong><strong>de</strong>r and Poli<strong>te</strong>ness. Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityPress.Mon<strong>te</strong>ro, M. (1998) ‘Discourse as a stage for political actors: an analysis ofpresi<strong>de</strong>ntial addresses in Arg<strong>en</strong>tina, Brazil, and V<strong>en</strong>ezu<strong>el</strong>a, <strong>en</strong> O.F<strong>el</strong>dman y C. <strong>de</strong> Landtsheer (eds.)’ Politically speaking. A worldwi<strong>de</strong>
Discurso & Sociedad, 3(2) 2009, 224-252250Adriana Bolívar,“¿<strong>Por</strong> qué <strong>no</strong> <strong>te</strong> <strong>callas</strong>”: Los <strong>alcance</strong>s <strong>de</strong> <strong>una</strong> <strong>frase</strong> <strong>en</strong> <strong>el</strong><strong>de</strong>s<strong>en</strong>cu<strong>en</strong>tro___________________________________________________________examination of language used in the public sphere, 91-102.Westport/Connecticut/London: Preager.Nieto y O<strong>te</strong>ro, M.J. (2008) Una carac<strong>te</strong>rización pragmalingüística <strong>de</strong> lavinculación afectiva <strong>en</strong> <strong>el</strong> discurso político. Tesis doctoral. Doctorado<strong>en</strong> Estudios <strong>de</strong>l Discurso. Facultad <strong>de</strong> Humanida<strong>de</strong>s y Educación,Universidad c<strong>en</strong>tral <strong>de</strong> V<strong>en</strong>ezu<strong>el</strong>a.Olivares, F. (2009) ‘<strong>El</strong> gran comunicador’, <strong>El</strong> Universal, secciónExpedi<strong>en</strong><strong>te</strong>, pp. 1-13, 12 <strong>de</strong> abril <strong>de</strong> 2009.Olshtain, E. (1989) “Apologies across languages”, <strong>en</strong> S. Blum-Kulka, J.House y G. Kasper (eds.), Cross-cultural Pragmatics: Re<strong>que</strong>sts andApologies Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp. 155-73.Olsh<strong>te</strong>in, E. y Weinbach, L (1987) ‘Complaints: a study of speech actbehavior among native and <strong>no</strong>nnative speakers of Hebrew’, <strong>en</strong> J.Verschuer<strong>en</strong> y M. Bertuc<strong>el</strong>li-Papi (eds.) The pragmatic perspective.S<strong>el</strong>ec<strong>te</strong>d papers from the 1985 In<strong>te</strong>rnational Pragmatics Confer<strong>en</strong>ce,195-208. Ams<strong>te</strong>rdam: B<strong>en</strong>jamins.Pardo Abril, N. (2008) ‘<strong>El</strong> discurso multimodal <strong>en</strong> You Tube’, RevistaLati<strong>no</strong>americana <strong>de</strong> Estudios <strong>de</strong>l discurso 8(1): 77-107.Poss<strong>en</strong>ti, S. (2008) ‘Um percurso: o caso “por qué <strong>no</strong> <strong>te</strong> <strong>callas</strong>”’. RevistaLati<strong>no</strong>americana <strong>de</strong> Estudios <strong>de</strong>l Discurso 8(1): 109-117.Tovar-Arroyo, G. (2009) ‘<strong>Por</strong> qué <strong>te</strong> <strong>callas</strong><strong>te</strong>? <strong>El</strong> Nacional, secciónNación, 18 <strong>de</strong> abril <strong>de</strong> 2009, p.11.Van Dijk, T.A. (2006) ‘Discurso y manipulación: discusión <strong>te</strong>órica yalg<strong>una</strong>s aplicaciones’, Revista Sig<strong>no</strong>s 39 (60): 49-74.
- Page 1 and 2: Copyright © 2009ISSN 1887-4606Vol.
- Page 3 and 4: Discurso & Sociedad, 3(2) 2009, 224
- Page 5 and 6: Discurso & Sociedad, 3(2) 2009, 224
- Page 7 and 8: Discurso & Sociedad, 3(2) 2009, 224
- Page 9 and 10: Discurso & Sociedad, 3(2) 2009, 224
- Page 11 and 12: Discurso & Sociedad, 3(2) 2009, 224
- Page 13 and 14: Discurso & Sociedad, 3(2) 2009, 224
- Page 15 and 16: Discurso & Sociedad, 3(2) 2009, 224
- Page 17 and 18: Discurso & Sociedad, 3(2) 2009, 224
- Page 19 and 20: Discurso & Sociedad, 3(2) 2009, 224
- Page 21 and 22: Discurso & Sociedad, 3(2) 2009, 224
- Page 23 and 24: Discurso & Sociedad, 3(2) 2009, 224
- Page 25: Discurso & Sociedad, 3(2) 2009, 224
- Page 29: Discurso & Sociedad, 3(2) 2009, 224