002526_RFOL16n1 jor copy.idd - Unimep

1 2
CONCLUSÃO
Da abordagem da literatura revisada,
podem ser extraídas as seguintes conclusões:
• o sistema In-Ceram Spinell proporciona
excelente resultado estético, mas limitadas
propriedades mecânicas, não sendo
indicado para regiões em que há grande
estresse mastigatório;
• o In-Ceram Zircônia parece ter excelentes
características mecânicas; entretanto,
por ser bastante recente, são
necessários estudos clínicos longitudinais
a longo prazo para que seu desempenho
mecânico possa ser confirmado
clinicamente nas coroas e próteses fixas
posteriores;
• o surgimento dos sistemas Spinell e
Zircônia, por meio de modificações na
estrutura do sistema In-Ceram Alumina,
sugere uma importante versatilidade do
sistema, aumentando sua aplicação clínica
como materiais para infra-estrutura
cerâmica.
REFERÊNCIAS BIBLIOGRÁFICAS
1. Apholt W, Bindl A, Luthy H, Mormann WH. Flexural
strength of Cerec 2 machined and jointed In-Ceram Alumina
and In-Ceram Zirconia bars. Dent Mater, Copenhagen,
2001 mai; (17):260-7.
2. Anusavice KJ. Recent developments in restorative dental
ceramics. J Am Dent Assoc, Chicago, 1993 fev; 124
(2):72-84.
3. Bailey LF, Bennett RJ. Dicor surface treatments for enhanced
bonding. J Dent Res, Washington DC, 1988 jun; 67
(6):925-31.
4. Blixt M, Adamczak E, Linden LA, Odenia A, Arvidson
K. Shear bond strength of luting cements to alumina and
dentin. J Dent Res, Alexandria, 1997 mar; (76):72.
5. Chain MC, Arcari GM, Lopes GC. Restaurações cerâmicas
estéticas e próteses livres de metal. RGO, Porto Alegre,
2000 abr/mai/jun; 48 (2):67-70.
6. Chong KH, Chai J, Takahashi Y, Wozniak W. Flexural
strength of In-Ceram Alumina and In-Ceram Zirconia
core materials. Int J Prosthodont, Lombard, 2002 mar/abr;
15 (2):183-8.
7. Correr Sobrinho L, Cattell MJ, Glover RH, Knowles JC.
Investigation of the dry and wet fatigue properties of three
all-ceramic crown systems. Int J Prosthodont, Lombard,
1998 mai/jun; 11 (3):255-62.
8. Dwan A, Yamanip P, Razzoog ME, Wang RF. Effect of
cement on fracture resistance of all-ceramic crowns. J Dent
Res, Alexandria, 1996 mar; 75:284.
9. Evans DB, O’Brien WJ. Fracture strength of glass infiltrated-magnesia
core porcelain. Int J Prosthodont, Lombard,
1999 jan/fev; 12 (1):38-44.
10. Giordano RA. Comparison of all-ceramic restorative systems:
part 2. Gen Dent, Chicago, 2000 jan/fev; 48
(1):38-40, 43-5.
11. Haselton DR, Diaz-Arnold AM, Hillis SL. Clinical assessment
of high-strength all-ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent,
St. Louis, 2000; 83 (4):396-401.
12. Huls A. All-ceramic restorations with the In-Ceram system.
6 years of clinical experience. A short manual, 1995 fev.
13. Hwang JW, Yang JH. Fracture strength of copy-milled and
conventional In-Ceram crowns. J Oral Rehabil, Oxford,
2001 jul; 28:678-83.
14. Kern M, Thompson VP. Bonding to glass infiltrated alumina
ceramic: adhesive methods and their durability. J
Prosthet Dent, St. Louis, 1995 mar; 73 (3):240-9.
15. Kern M, Wegner SM. Bonding to zirconia ceramic: adhesion
methods and their durability. Dent Mater, Copenhagen,
1998 jan; 14:64-71.
16. Leevailoj C, Platt JÁ, Cochran MA, Moore BK. In vitro
study of fracture incidence and compressive fracture load
of all-ceramic crowns cemented with resin-modified glass
ionomer and other luting agents. J Prosthet Dent, St.
Louis, 1998 dez; 80 (6):699-707.
17. Magne P, Belser U. Esthetic improvements and in vitro testing
of In-Ceram Alumina and Spinell ceramic. Int J Prosthodont,
Lombard, 1997 set/out; 10 (5):459-66.
18. McLaren EA, White SN. Survival of In-Ceram crowns in
a private practice: a prospective clinical trial. J Prosthet
Dent, St. Louis, 2000 fev; 83 (2):216-22.
19. Paul SJ, Pietrobon N, Scharer P. The new In-Ceram Spinell
– a case report. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent,
Chicago, 1995 dez; 15 (6):521-7.
20. Pera P, Gilodi S, Bassi F, Carroza S. In vitro marginal
adaptation of alumina porcelain ceramic crowns. J Prosthet
Dent, St. Louis, 1994 dez; 72 (6):585-90.
21. Probster L. Survival rate of In-Ceram restorations. Int
Prosthodont, Lombard, 1993 mai/jun; 6 (3):259-63.
22. Rosemblum MA, Schulman A. A review of all-ceramic
restorations. J Am Dent Assoc, Chicago, 1997 mar;
128:298-307.
23. Roulet JF, Janda R. Future ceramic systems. Oper Dent,
Seattle, supl. 2001; 6:211-28.
24. Schalch MV. Resistência à flexão, resistência à tração diametral
e dureza de sistemas cerâmicos para infra-estrutura
[Dissertação de mestrado em reabilitação oral]. Araraquara
(SP): Universidade Estadual Paulista; 2003.
25. Scherrer SS, De Rijk WG, Belser UC. Fracture resistance
of human enamel and three all-ceramic crown systems on
extracted teeth. Int J Prosthodont, Lombard, 1996 nov/
dez; 9 (6):580-5.
26. Seghi RR, Sorensen JA. Relative flexural strength of six
new ceramic materials. Int J Prosthodont, Lombard, 1995
mai/jun; 8 (3):239-46.
27. Strub JR, Beschnidt SM. Fracture strength of 5 different
all-ceramic crown system. Int J Prosthodont, Lombard,
1998 nov/dez; 11 (6):602-9.
28. Tinschert J, Natt G, Mautsch W, Augthun M, Spiekermann
H. Fracture resistance of lithium disilicate-, alumina-,
and zirconia-based three-unit fixed partial dentures:
a laboratory study. Int J Prosthodont, Lombard, 2001
mai/jun; 14 (3):231-8.
29. Tinschert J, Natt G, Mautsch W, Spiekermann H, Anusavice
KJ. Marginal fit of alumina-and zirconia-based fixed
partial dentures produced by a CAD/CAM system. Oper
Dent, Seattle, 2001 jul/ago; 26 (4):367-74.
30. Yoshinari M, Dérand T. Fracture strength of all-ceramic
crowns. Int J Prosthodont, Lombard, 1994 jul/ago; 7
(4):329-38.
Rev. Fac. Odontol. Lins, Piracicaba, 16 (1): 7-12, 2004
UNIMEP • Universidade Metodista de Piracicaba