01.08.2019 Views

Belavia OnAir №117 August 2019

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ЛЮДИ<br />

249<br />

Sure, hardly was Таrkovsky planning his world fame<br />

while shooting his “Mirror” or “Solaris”… But at the<br />

same time any creative person or team inevitable<br />

face reality when looking for a budget or trying to<br />

solve some “mundane” problems.<br />

Definitely, and it is what producers usually do — an<br />

important side of film industry, I would say. But film<br />

producers can also be very different. Someone might<br />

actually be planning to get rich. Why not? Once you are<br />

a film producer, it can be your priority, I think. And I totally<br />

understand film producers who are doing their job to<br />

make money. If we look at the other side of the ocean,<br />

for example, — America. For them it’s the whole industry!<br />

Really huge! And among this industry they are making<br />

beautiful films! So, it can be combined — and in both the<br />

sides it will be beneficial. But it is not my case. Maybe<br />

I am just too naïve, but I’d say I’d rather do something<br />

else than trying to make serious money in cinema.<br />

Measuring success by financial indicators seems<br />

to be always characteristic of the Americans as a<br />

nation.<br />

Maybe, but you need to keep in mind that cinema did<br />

start for them as an industry — in the USA, initially, it was<br />

the second important industry after car manufacturing.<br />

So, it had totally different grounds and it still has. So,<br />

I wouldn’t really judge saying it’s somehow “good” or<br />

“bad” — it’s just different. Approaches differ, and I even<br />

actually… maybe slightly admire theirs! The ability of<br />

making everything with a very clear economic basis,<br />

their practical side combined with reaching the goal of<br />

entertaining people at the same time. Why not? This is<br />

also what we are looking for.<br />

If to get back to “Оscar” — how were you accepted<br />

there? Did you manage to accept their “rules of<br />

the game”?<br />

I think the key is to understand that you can’t just<br />

go mad about it. You need to take it rather easy. It’s<br />

all a game. We know the rules and we are playing<br />

according to them and actually it can be very funny.<br />

For the first time being in this competition, seeing<br />

all the campaigning, all this “Oscar” race, meeting<br />

all these people is really very interesting — really<br />

thrilling! But! It’s not everything. You can’t take it too<br />

seriously. And we never thought that being there was<br />

our “everything”. If you approach it like that, cool and<br />

calm, people around you (who are probably “in this<br />

world”) would be accepting you at the same level.<br />

I was not begging anyone to give me “Oscar”, I wasn’t<br />

there for this, so I always felt rather comfortable.<br />

Because I do see it as a game.<br />

And the ceremony itself was very flashy, very<br />

impressive — it’s a great thing to see! Everyone was<br />

very relaxed, eager to communicate, discussing every<br />

aspect of the films they had seen, which was really<br />

showing the love the Americans have for films. They<br />

really do. And their knowledge of cinema is so high!<br />

РЕКЛАМА | ADVERTISING

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!