FLEISCHWIRTSCHAFT international 1/2017
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
.........................................<br />
Fleischwirtschaft <strong>international</strong> 1_<strong>2017</strong><br />
63<br />
Research &Development<br />
D-value; pH’ is the pH of the recovery medium; pH’opt is the optimal pH value<br />
of the recovery medium; z’pH is the distance of pH from pH’ of the recovery<br />
medium which leads to aten-fold reduction of the D-value; a’w is aw of the<br />
recovery medium; a’wopt is the optimal aw of the recovery medium; z’aw is the<br />
distance of aw from the a’w of the recovery medium which leads to atenfold<br />
reduction of the D-value.<br />
Taking into consideration the correlation between the time of decimal<br />
reduction and the degree of lethality L:<br />
D=<br />
D*<br />
L<br />
anew calculation model of the Lvalue was elaborated:<br />
T–T* IpH–pH*I a w–1<br />
a´w–1<br />
pH´–pH´opt<br />
( ) 2<br />
z´aw<br />
L =10<br />
( ) 2<br />
z T z pH z aw z´pH<br />
+ + ++<br />
Explanations as in the equation above.<br />
It replaces the well-known model elaborated by BIGELOW (1921).<br />
The application of the above-presented model requires the determination<br />
of appropriate coefficients (zpH,zaw,z’pH,z’aw)for the indicator microorganism.<br />
These coefficients were determined for bacteria from the<br />
Bacillus and Clostridium genera, in other words, sporulating bacteria<br />
which should be taken into consideration during the sterilisation process<br />
(LEGUÉRINEL et al., 2000, 2005; GAILLARD et al., 1998; COROLLER,etal., 2001;<br />
MAFART et al., 2001).Following the process of sterilisation of canned meat<br />
products of the SSP type, spores of bacteria are no longer capable of<br />
germinating because of unfavorable environmental conditions (reduced<br />
aw and pH values, presence of NaNO2)and, therefore, when assessing the<br />
effectiveness of the heating process, it is necessary to take into account<br />
the survivability of thermoresistant non-sporulating bacteria. Enterococci<br />
are considered to be most thermoresistant among the vegetative bacteria<br />
(GIRAFFA,2002; FRANZ et al., 2003; HUGAS et al., 2003). These bacteria<br />
occur in many foods (meat, dairy and vegetable origin) and play an important<br />
role in the production of fermented meat products and cheese (PAVIA<br />
et al., 2000). The surface of pig carcasses contain 10 4 to 10 8 enterococci<br />
per 100cm 2 .The predominant isolated species are E. faecium and E.<br />
faecalis (KNUDTSON and HARTMAN,1993). Enterococci are used as starter<br />
cultures and their bacteriocins are usuallyactive towards such<br />
pathogens like Listeria and Clostridium (GIRAFF et al., 1995, 1997; AYMERICH<br />
et al., 2000). They are also used as human probiotics however they are<br />
important nosocomial pathogens, that cause bacteraemia, endocarditis<br />
and other infections. The role of enterococci in diseases call into question<br />
their safety for the usage in foods or as probiotics. The presence of<br />
enterococci in the gastrointestinal tract of animals leads to ahigh potential<br />
for contamination of meat at the time of slaughter (FRANZ et al., 2003).<br />
In the case of these microorganisms, the impact of water activity on<br />
changes in their thermoresistance and possibilities of regeneration after<br />
pasteurisation was determined, in other words, zaw and z’aw values were<br />
determined which –for Enterococcus faecium PCM 1859 –amount to 0.14<br />
and 0.44, respectively(DANYLUK et al., 2013). On the other hand, no information<br />
is available with respect to the influence of pH on the behavior of<br />
these microorganisms during pasteurization and their possibilities of<br />
regeneration during astorage period, i.e. zpH and z’pH values were not<br />
determined.<br />
The aim of this paper was to ascertain thermoresistance and regeneration<br />
possibilities of thermallydamaged Enterococcus faecium PCM 1859<br />
cells depending on the pH value of the medium during heating and incubation<br />
following the thermal process and to determine zpH and z’pH values. In<br />
combination with the results published earlier (DANYLUK et al., 2013), they<br />
allow the determination of anew formula for the calculation of the degree<br />
of lethality which constitutes the basis for the determination of the pasteurization<br />
value Pduring heating of canned meat products. The subjectmatter<br />
of the article is very complex and depends on anumber of factors<br />
mentioned in the manuscript and it constitutes amodel system which<br />
provides abasis for further investigations in future.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
Preparation of samples<br />
The bacterial strain used in the described experiments was that of Enterococcus<br />
faecium PCM 1859 derived from the Strain Collection of the Polish<br />
Academy of Sciences in Wrocław. Experimental bacteria were cultured on<br />
Slanetzand Bartey medium with differing pH values. The substrate pH value<br />
was reduced with by HCl and the following variants were obtained:<br />
r basic medium (optimal) containing: pepton 20.0 g, dipotassium phosphate<br />
4.0 g, yeast extract 5.0 g, glucose 2.0 g, sodium azide 0.4 g,<br />
TTC0.1 g, agar 15.0 g, distilled water 1L;pHofthe ready medium 7.2,<br />
aw=1.0 –A<br />
r basic medium +0.8 mL 1NHCl; aw=1.0, pH= 7.0–B<br />
r basic medium +2.7 mL 1NHCl; aw=1.0, pH= 6.8 –C<br />
r basic medium +5.0 mL 1NHCl; aw=1.0, pH= 6.5 –D<br />
Following inoculation, the samples were incubated for 48 hatatemperature<br />
of 37 °C. Bacteria collected from media AtoDwere placed in the test<br />
tubes (Ø= 16 mm) with aphysiological fluid containing the same quantity of<br />
HCl as during culturing. Their initial concentration amounted to 10 6 to<br />
10 8 cfu/mL. Next, 10 mL suspension was collected from each flask, transferred<br />
to three test tubes and heated in awater bath at atemperature of<br />
55 °C, respectively, for 10,20and 30 min. The same procedures were followed<br />
when bacteria were heated at atemperature of 60 °C for 1, 3and<br />
5min and at 65 °C for 1, 2and 3min. Each experiment was repeated three<br />
times. After the appropriate time of heating, the bacteria were inoculated<br />
Heat resistance<br />
Tab. 1: Heat resistance of Enterococcus faecium cultured, heated and recovered in medium with different pH.<br />
Decimal reduction time<br />
pH value of medium during<br />
Variant<br />
Heating Recovery D55 (min.) D60 (min.) D65 (min.)<br />
7.2 7.2 A 10.82 c ±0.45 1.51 c ±0.01 0.91 e ±0.10<br />
7.0 7.2 B 10.17 c ±0.22 1.43 c ±0.26 0.84 de ±0.07<br />
7.0 7.0 B’ 9.78 bc ±1.22 1.46 c ±0.07 0.69 bcd ±0.06<br />
6.8 7.2 C 9.92 c ±0.15 1.38 bc ±0.11 0,80 bcde ±0.11<br />
6.8 6.8 C’ 8.97 abc ±0.11 1.15 abc ±0.05 0.67 bc ±0.08<br />
6.5 7.2 D 7.83 ab ±0.85 1.04 ab ±0.17 0.61 ab ±0.00<br />
6.5 6.5 D’ 7.26 a ±0.45 0.95 a ±0.14 0.51 a ±0.02<br />
The same letters in columns denote not significant difference for means at p ≤ 0.05 (n= 6; mean ±standard deviation)<br />
Source: DANYLUK and STANGIERSKI <strong>FLEISCHWIRTSCHAFT</strong> <strong>international</strong> 1_<strong>2017</strong>