03.05.2018 Views

FLEISCHWIRTSCHAFT international 1/2017

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

.......................................<br />

64<br />

Fleischwirtschaft <strong>international</strong> 1_<strong>2017</strong><br />

Research &Development Thermoresistance and regeneration of heat-damaged E. faecium PCM 1859 ...<br />

Source: DANYLUK and STANGIERSKI <strong>FLEISCHWIRTSCHAFT</strong> <strong>international</strong> 1_<strong>2017</strong><br />

Fig. 1: Change of the D-value (%) during heating of E. faecium in the environment<br />

with reduced pH value.<br />

a, b–different letters for agiven temperature indicate statisticallysignificant<br />

differences at p≤0.05 (n= 6)<br />

in order to ascertain the number of survived microorganisms. Bacteria<br />

cultured on medium Awere flushed after heating with medium A; bacteria<br />

collected from the media of reduced pH value were incubated on medium A<br />

(optimal) and, simultaneously, on the medium characterised by the same<br />

parameters as during heating. The Asurvival curve was plotted for agiven<br />

heating temperature from which the time of the decimal reduction Dwas<br />

determined for both the bacteria incubated on the basic medium and on<br />

the modified medium (of reduced pH value) and then from the curve of<br />

log D-pH dependence, zpH and z’pH coefficients were determined. When<br />

plotting the log D-pH curve, alinear course was assumed (R 2 =0.7634 for<br />

D55;R 2 =0.6326 for D60;R 2 =0.8048 for D65).<br />

Measurements of pH<br />

Measurements of pH value were conducted employing aSchott Geräte<br />

pH-meter type CG 840 (Mainz, Germany) equipped with aglass electrode.<br />

Statistical analysis<br />

All the determinations were performed in two replications and the results<br />

were subjected to statistical analysis. One-factorial analysis of variance<br />

and post hoc Tukey’stest were applied for multiple comparison of mean<br />

value. The level of significance was p≤0.05. All computations were performed<br />

using Statistica PL v. 10 software by StatSoft.<br />

Results and discussion<br />

Table 1presents the impact of the medium pH during heating on the D-<br />

values (variants A, B, Cand D-regeneration on optimal medium). The obtained<br />

research results indicate that the sensitivity of the assessed bacteria<br />

to heating differed depending on the pH of the environment during the<br />

heating process.<br />

Figure 1presents differences in the D-values during heating at agiven<br />

temperature depending on the pH of the medium. The D-value determined<br />

during sample heating on the substrate of the optimal pH of 7.2was assumed<br />

as 100%. During heating at the temperature of 55 and 60 °C, the<br />

reduction in the D-value was similar and amounted to, respectively, 6and<br />

5.3% at pH 7.0and to 8.3 and 8.6% at pH 6.8. Heating at the temperature of<br />

65 °C led to the greatest reduction in the value of D, i.e. by 7.7% at pH 7.0<br />

and by 12.1% at pH 6.8. The lowest thermal resistance of the strain was<br />

recorded when samples were heated in the environment where the pH<br />

amounted to 6.5; the D-values were reduced by 27.6% (55 °C), 31.1% (60 °C)<br />

and 33.0% (65 °C) in comparison with the values determined during the<br />

heating at agiven temperature at optimal pH (7.2). However, astatistically<br />

significant impact of the medium pH on E. faecium’s thermoresistance<br />

expressed by the D–value was demonstrated onlyinthe case of heating of<br />

the bacteria in the environment of pH 6.5 irrespective of the temperature<br />

of heating. On the other hand, experiments on the thermal resistance of<br />

Bacillus stearothermophillus carried out by LÓPEZ et al., (1996) demonstrated<br />

that the effect of any given pH is depended on the treatment<br />

temperature. At low treatment temperatures (115 °C), amarked reduction<br />

of the D-values was observed when pH was lowered from 7.0to4.0. This<br />

reduction was significantlylower at 125°C. At higher temperatures<br />

(135°C), the D-values obtained in pH 6.0 and 7.0 did not show significant<br />

differences.<br />

The available literature data indicate that pH reduction enhances the<br />

preservation effect of food products. This may be caused by the growth<br />

inhibition of microorganisms, whose growth depends on levels of free H +<br />

ions and concentrations of undissociated, weaker acids which, in turn,<br />

is dependent on pH. Anions of some weaker acids are metabolised in the<br />

bacterial cell in such away that H + ions are liberated by acidifying the<br />

interior of the cell to the level of inhibiting growth (SABATAKOU et al., 2001).<br />

The effect of preservation can also be the result of diminished thermoresistance<br />

of microorganisms in the environment with reduced pH. In the<br />

case of spores, the mechanism of this phenomenon can be explained by<br />

the fact that, during heating in acid environment, hydrogen ions replace<br />

calcium ions associated with the cell and form the so called H-sporeions<br />

characterised by lower thermoresistance. All calcium ions which<br />

constitute approximately2%ofspore dry matter can be removed in this<br />

way.This is areversible phenomenon. When pH increases, hydrogen ions<br />

are again substituted by calcium found in food products. However, this<br />

process is so slow that during heating of food products spores continue<br />

to be sensitive to heat (GOULD,1996).<br />

Reduced thermoresistance at lower pH was demonstrated for Salmonella<br />

enteritidis and Escherichia coli indicating simultaneouslythat the effect<br />

depended on the type of the applied acid: lactic acid and acetic acid exhibited<br />

asimilar or even greater lethal effect than HCl, whereas the application<br />

of citric acid decreased this effect (BLACKBURN et al., 1997). Reduced<br />

thermoresistance under the influence of lactic and acetic acids was also<br />

reported in the course of heating of S. faecium (HOUBEN,1980; 1982). It was<br />

demonstrated that bacteria were more sensitive to pH changes than<br />

yeasts and molds (SABATAKOU et al., 2001).<br />

The calculation of D-values determined in the case of E. faecium<br />

heating in environments characterised by different pH allowed determination<br />

of log D-pH dependence as well as the zpH coefficient, i.e. the<br />

difference in the pH value which causes tenfold reduction of D. The zpH<br />

values presented in Table 2confirm that, together with the increase of<br />

heating temperature, the sensitivity of the examined strain to the<br />

medium acidity also increases: zpH decreases from 5.12 (55 °C) to 4.09<br />

(65 °C).<br />

If during the heating process the conditions (aw and pH) in the can are<br />

not optimal for bacteria, then also during storage the possibility of regeneration<br />

of microorganisms will be reduced. The results collated in Table 1<br />

indicate that heating and regeneration of E. faecium bacteria on the<br />

medium with areduced pH value (variant B`, C` and D`) –incomparison<br />

with the control (variant A) –caused astatisticallysignificant diminishment<br />

of the decimal reduction times D55 and D60 onlythen, when the pH<br />

value was lowered to 6.5 (variant G`). On the other hand, heating at the<br />

temperature of 65 °C caused astatisticallysignificant change of the<br />

decimal reduction time already at pH ≤7.0 indicating that the D65 value for<br />

B`, C` and D` variants differed statisticallysignificantlyfrom the D65 value<br />

determined for the control sample (variant A). From the dependence log D-<br />

pH of the medium during regeneration, the z’pH coefficient was determined<br />

for E. faecium on amodified medium of differing pH. The obtained results<br />

are collated in Table 2. The z’pH coefficient declined together with the<br />

increase of heating temperature and fluctuated from 4.08 (55 °C) to 2.98<br />

(65 °C). These values were by 20.3 to 27.4% lower in comparison with the<br />

zpH value which means that the thermoresistance of the examined bacteria<br />

was significantlysmaller than those determined on optimal media.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!