29.12.2012 Views

Single pull macgregor type hatch cover.pdf - Cochin University of ...

Single pull macgregor type hatch cover.pdf - Cochin University of ...

Single pull macgregor type hatch cover.pdf - Cochin University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

All <strong>type</strong>s <strong>of</strong> wooden <strong>hatch</strong> were made watertight by means <strong>of</strong> tarpaulins<br />

and this method is still employed in those ships with traditional <strong>hatch</strong>es that<br />

remain in service. The use <strong>of</strong> wooden <strong>hatch</strong> <strong>cover</strong> has declined throughout much<br />

<strong>of</strong> this century to the extent that it is now almost unthinkable that they should be<br />

fitted in modern vessel <strong>of</strong> any size. It is interesting therefore, to consider the<br />

reason for their demise. These fall into three broad categories, namely safety and<br />

security, cargo working and maintenance.<br />

1.3 FAILINGS OF WOODEN HATCHES<br />

1.3.1 Safety and Security<br />

It is impossible to exaggerate the importance and secure <strong>hatch</strong> <strong>cover</strong>s; there can be<br />

no question that a ship’s survival may depend upon having them. But how<br />

efficient are wooden <strong>hatch</strong> <strong>cover</strong>s?<br />

Tarpaulins are the most vulnerable component <strong>of</strong> traditional <strong>hatch</strong> <strong>cover</strong>s.<br />

There are several common reasons for tarpaulin failure. Slackening <strong>of</strong> wedges is<br />

one <strong>of</strong> the most important factor. Chaffing is another serious source <strong>of</strong> weakness,<br />

especially at the coamings. Tarpaulins are also liable to suffer damage every time<br />

that they are removed for working cargo.<br />

Security <strong>of</strong> the wooden <strong>hatch</strong>es also arose as a result <strong>of</strong> the comparatively<br />

large size <strong>of</strong> the <strong>hatch</strong>ways <strong>of</strong> many <strong>of</strong> the ships, especially colliers, then entering<br />

service. Not only were the <strong>hatch</strong>ways longer and wider than had been the customs<br />

up to that time, but the ratio <strong>of</strong> <strong>hatch</strong> width to overall beam was <strong>of</strong>ten greater too.<br />

This was particularly apparent in ships employed in the carriage <strong>of</strong> bulk cargoes<br />

and some <strong>of</strong> the most extreme examples were to be amongst self-trimming<br />

colliers where <strong>hatch</strong> width/ship beam ratios <strong>of</strong>ten exceed 0.6.<br />

Individual <strong>hatch</strong> boards were laid loosely on top <strong>of</strong> the beams in a normal<br />

<strong>hatch</strong>way and they could easily be shipped accidently. In order to prevent this,<br />

interlocking boards were developed. These could be handled manually in the<br />

usual manner but once landed on the beams; they were retained in place by a<br />

simple locking device which was claimed by its manufacturer to enhance the<br />

safety <strong>of</strong> a ship, should it lose its tarpaulins, by preventing the boards from being<br />

washed away by the sea.<br />

5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!