26.02.2013 Views

Dóra Fazekas Carbon Market Implications for new EU - UniCredit ...

Dóra Fazekas Carbon Market Implications for new EU - UniCredit ...

Dóra Fazekas Carbon Market Implications for new EU - UniCredit ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

hold an amount of AAUs equivalent to how much GHG it has emitted during the period. Countries,<br />

which have reduced their emissions below their allocated allowances, will be able to trade the<br />

surplus allowances to others that have exceeded their cap (<strong>Carbon</strong> Trust, 2006).<br />

Hungary, Japan and New Zealand have been the first countries to achieve eligibility by the first day<br />

of the Kyoto commitment period, on January 1, 2008. There<strong>for</strong>e, they can participate in the<br />

international transaction of UN regulated carbon credits.<br />

(2) Project-based transactions<br />

In the case of project-based transactions, industrialized countries are allowed to take credit <strong>for</strong><br />

actions done offshore. The flexibility in the geographical dimension of the actions taken by<br />

industrialized countries to reduce GHGs is justified by the scientific fact that in the case of climate<br />

change the concentration of GHGs in the upper atmosphere is what matters.<br />

(a) Joint Implementation<br />

The Kyoto Protocol allows Joint Implementation between Annex I countries (article 6), which is<br />

supplemental to domestic actions (article 6 (1d)), voluntary, and which contributes to emissions<br />

reduction projects in other Annex B countries. Emissions reduced by JI projects need to be<br />

additional in order to receive emissions credits called Emissions Reduction Units. In 1995, the<br />

Berlin Conference of the Parties decided on a pilot phase <strong>for</strong> Joint Implementation without crediting<br />

called Activities Implemented Jointly. This program was intended to explore the design of emission<br />

reduction and sequestration projects situated in developing countries and countries in transition; and<br />

was financed through funds from Annex I Governments or private entities.<br />

(b) Clean Development Mechanism<br />

The Kyoto Protocol includes a <strong>new</strong> way of linking emission reduction with economic development.<br />

The CDM promotes sustainable development and helps developed countries meet their<br />

commitments; contributes to emissions reduction projects in non Annex B countries; and leads to<br />

the creation of Certified Emission Reductions (article 12 (3)). Article 12 (3) states that countries<br />

that fund projects through the CDM get credit <strong>for</strong> certified emission reductions from these projects<br />

provided benefits accrue to the host country. Besides countries, companies are allowed to invest and<br />

execute projects (article 12 (9)). In contrast to the other flexibility mechanisms, CERs accrue <strong>for</strong> the<br />

whole period 2000-2012, not just <strong>for</strong> the commitment period (article 12 (10)). Developed countries<br />

with legally binding targets to achieve compliance can use CERs. A condition <strong>for</strong> the issue of<br />

credits is that projects generate emissions reductions that are additional to what would have<br />

happened in the absence of the project, a condition referred to as additionality. Emissions<br />

reductions need to be verified and certified by an authorised third party called the Designated<br />

Operational Entity.<br />

28

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!