28.02.2013 Views

3rd meeting of young researchers at UP 1 - IJUP - Universidade do ...

3rd meeting of young researchers at UP 1 - IJUP - Universidade do ...

3rd meeting of young researchers at UP 1 - IJUP - Universidade do ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Oporto, World Heritage – The Classific<strong>at</strong>ion and the Intervention<br />

Liliana P<strong>at</strong>rícia Vasconcelos Pinto and Teresa Campos <strong>do</strong>s Santos<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Heritage Studies (History <strong>of</strong> Art) Faculty <strong>of</strong> Arts <strong>of</strong> the University <strong>of</strong> Oporto (FL<strong>UP</strong>),<br />

Portugal.<br />

In the context <strong>of</strong> the course unit, Project Seminar I, it was developed a research work about<br />

Oporto, World Heritage, in order to check the main topics, which contributed to achieve this<br />

distinctive hallmark. Then, we needed to analyse the measures th<strong>at</strong> had been taken by the<br />

responsible organisms, theoretically and technically, in the urban area, after classific<strong>at</strong>ion. We<br />

evalu<strong>at</strong>ed not only the importance th<strong>at</strong> the Artistic Heritage had in the accomplishment <strong>of</strong> the<br />

hallmark, but also the proceedings implemented with the purpose <strong>of</strong> value th<strong>at</strong> Heritage. The<br />

leading premise <strong>of</strong> our project was to try to understand if Oporto was putting <strong>at</strong> risk the<br />

classific<strong>at</strong>ion given by UNESCO.<br />

The metho<strong>do</strong>logy applied divided the work in two different parts: the classific<strong>at</strong>ion and the<br />

intervention. At the beginning <strong>of</strong> the project, we investig<strong>at</strong>ed the quality <strong>of</strong> the inform<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

available on the <strong>of</strong>ficial sites rel<strong>at</strong>ed with this theme; afterwards, we consulted relevant<br />

bibliography and we studied proposals and projects <strong>of</strong> intervention; <strong>at</strong> last, we had to go to the<br />

fieldwork.<br />

At the first part, we studied the project introduced by CRUARB to UNESCO, in order to<br />

Oporto Historic Center be classified. Therefore, we rel<strong>at</strong>ed the Heritage Letters and<br />

Conventions with the ideas th<strong>at</strong> supported the candidacy. The point was to apprehend the<br />

values claimed as an identity <strong>of</strong> the building landscape and decisive to the classific<strong>at</strong>ion. A<br />

second aim was to realize which had been the objectives, projects and goals with whom Oporto<br />

had committed itself with UNESCO. At the second part, we investig<strong>at</strong>ed about the intervention<br />

th<strong>at</strong> follows the classific<strong>at</strong>ion and previous projects th<strong>at</strong> we had already mentioned. We<br />

decided to analyse Oporto 2001 enterprise and 2008 Management Report, from SRU- Porto<br />

Vivo (Urban Rehabilit<strong>at</strong>ion Society). In these projects, we tried to approach the main<br />

intervention areas and sectors referred. At last, we studied two examples <strong>of</strong> the reutiliz<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong><br />

a monument, as a benefit to the city and to keep Oporto as a World Heritage: Ferreira Borges<br />

Market and the project <strong>of</strong> Arts’ Palace.<br />

After all the investig<strong>at</strong>ion, we achieved some conclusions and answers to the question – Is<br />

Oporto, World Heritage hallmark in danger? -. Once we understood the values th<strong>at</strong><br />

contributed to the classific<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> Oporto, Historic Center, we noticed the need <strong>of</strong> renewal<br />

projects to the city, in order to maintain those values. As a result, we encounted an among <strong>of</strong><br />

organisms cre<strong>at</strong>ed with the purpose <strong>of</strong> serve this aim. We dealt with a huge quantity <strong>of</strong><br />

miscellaneous projects whose usually haven’t been put into effect. Then, it was clear for us the<br />

gap between the intervention projects and the fieldwork; the divorce between 2001 Oporto and<br />

the Historic Centre; wh<strong>at</strong> leaded us to conclude th<strong>at</strong> the programming was utopian, bearing<br />

resemblance with 2008 Management Report. Oporto stills suffering with a century <strong>of</strong><br />

aban<strong>do</strong>nment and disrepair and it seems it hasn’t find a solution, yet. We testified th<strong>at</strong> Oporto<br />

lives the thre<strong>at</strong> <strong>of</strong> become an unequal city. On one hand, a city with <strong>at</strong>tractive and dynamic<br />

areas and, on the other hand forbidden areas, where ghettos still <strong>do</strong>min<strong>at</strong>ing.<br />

The maintenance <strong>of</strong> the hallmark has been sheltered in isol<strong>at</strong>ed interventions instead <strong>of</strong> the<br />

integr<strong>at</strong>ed value <strong>of</strong> the classified Historic Centre.<br />

228 3 rd <strong>meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>young</strong> <strong>researchers</strong> <strong>at</strong> <strong>UP</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!