S140 and safety in procurement of fresh fruits and vegetables. Food Policy 2004 (30):254: 269. 46. Dolan C, Humphrey J. Governance and trade in fresh vegetables: The impact of UK supermarkets on the Afri- S. Ramaswamy and B. Viswanathan can horticulture industry. J Dev Stud 2000;37:147–76. 47. Busch L, Bain C. New! Improved? The trans<strong>for</strong>mation of the global agri<strong>food</strong> system. Rural Sociology 2004; 69:321–46.
Beyond recommendations: <strong>Implementing</strong> <strong>food</strong>-<strong>based</strong> <strong>dietary</strong> <strong>guidelines</strong> <strong>for</strong> healthier populations Suttilak Smitasiri and Ricardo Uauy Abstract To reduce the increased burden of diet-related disease and promote human potential through <strong>food</strong> and nutrition globally, harmonization of ef<strong>for</strong>ts is urgently needed. This article examines the concept of <strong>food</strong>-<strong>based</strong> <strong>dietary</strong> <strong>guidelines</strong> (FBDGs) and discusses the possibilities and challenges of harmonizing the process of developing and implementing <strong>dietary</strong> <strong>guidelines</strong>. The authors argue that while the development of FBDGs has contributed to the understanding of the role of nutrients and <strong>food</strong>s in achieving optimal health, the impact of these <strong>guidelines</strong> on human health has been limited. Science or evidence must be used in FBDG development; nevertheless, there are limitations in current nutrition science. FBDGs should address the health consequences of <strong>dietary</strong> insufficiency, excess, or imbalance with a broader perspective, considering the totality of the effects of a given <strong>dietary</strong> pattern, rather than focusing on single nutrients alone. Moreover, the <strong>food</strong> selection guideline should be seen as complementary to a strategic, comprehensive, and culturally appropriate <strong>dietary</strong> and health promoting intervention, and not only as a tool <strong>for</strong> providing nutrition policy and in<strong>for</strong>mation. Technically, a single unified global set of FBDGs may be desirable and even achievable. This concept, however, presents novel challenges on how to address cultural diversity and the complex social, economic, and political interactions between humans and the <strong>food</strong> supply, not to mention the complexity of its communication and Suttilak Smitasiri is affiliated with the Institute of Nutrition, Mahidol University (INMU), Nakorn Phathom, Thailand; Ricardo Uauy is affiliated with the Instituto de Nutrición y Technología de los Alimentos (INTA), University of Chile, Santiago, Chile, and the Nutrition and Public Health Intervention Research Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London. Please direct queries to the corresponding author: Suttilak Smitasiri, Division of Communication and Behavioral Science, Institute of Nutrition, Mahidol University (INMU), Phuthamonthon 4 Road, Salaya, Nakorn Phathom 73170, Thailand; e-mail: nussm@mahidol.ac.th. implementation. There<strong>for</strong>e, global harmonized ef<strong>for</strong>ts in support of strategic <strong>dietary</strong> interventions, together with strong global scientific support and facilitation <strong>for</strong> the development and communication of FBDGs at national or regional levels, are proposed to implement FBDGs <strong>for</strong> healthier populations. Key words: Food-<strong>based</strong> <strong>dietary</strong> <strong>guidelines</strong>, nutrient<strong>based</strong> <strong>dietary</strong> <strong>guidelines</strong>, <strong>food</strong> selection guides, unified <strong>food</strong> <strong>guidelines</strong> Introduction The establishment of <strong>food</strong>- or nutrient-<strong>based</strong> <strong>dietary</strong> <strong>guidelines</strong> (FBDGs or NBDGs) is a complex issue; this complexity will most likely continue to increase in the future as knowledge of the science base and the need to consider context in the application of FBDGs/NBDGs increase. International agencies and national authorities around the world are faced with the need to in<strong>for</strong>m and educate all constituencies involved in this process. Food and nutrition policy makers, planners, and common citizens need to be able to manage and make <strong>food</strong> choices at the national, community and individual levels. Several countries, beginning with those in the industrialized world, have developed FBDGs as one of many tools <strong>for</strong> this purpose. FBDGs are generally developed with the expectation that they will help to improve the effectiveness of nutrition education ef<strong>for</strong>ts, directed both to the general public and at the national level [1]. The US Government has developed and tendered official <strong>dietary</strong> advice <strong>for</strong> the public since 1894. The first US <strong>food</strong> guides were promoted in 1916 as conceptual frameworks <strong>for</strong> selecting the kinds and amounts of a variety of <strong>food</strong>s, which together provided a nutritionally satisfactory diet [2, 3]. Over the years, the US <strong>food</strong> guides have changed as nutrition knowledge has advanced and new discoveries relating diet and health have been made. The guides primarily focused on the Food and Nutrition Bulletin, vol. 28, no. 1 (supplement) © 2007, The <strong>United</strong> <strong>Nations</strong> University. S141
- Page 1 and 2:
Contents International harmonizatio
- Page 3 and 4:
Executive summary Harmonization of
- Page 5 and 6:
Executive summary [11]. These are l
- Page 7 and 8:
Executive summary and converted to
- Page 9 and 10:
Executive summary very rapidly and
- Page 11 and 12:
Executive summary References Concep
- Page 13 and 14:
Introduction Janet C. King and Cutb
- Page 15 and 16:
Introduction References 1. King JC,
- Page 17 and 18:
Terminology and framework for nutri
- Page 19 and 20:
Terminology and framework for nutri
- Page 21 and 22:
Terminology and framework for nutri
- Page 23 and 24:
Terminology and framework for nutri
- Page 25 and 26:
Terminology and framework for nutri
- Page 27 and 28:
Nutrient risk assessment: Setting u
- Page 29 and 30:
Setting upper levels for nutrient r
- Page 31 and 32:
Setting upper levels for nutrient r
- Page 33 and 34:
Setting upper levels for nutrient r
- Page 35 and 36:
Setting upper levels for nutrient r
- Page 37 and 38:
Setting upper levels for nutrient r
- Page 39 and 40:
Establishing nutrient intake values
- Page 41 and 42:
Establishing nutrient intake values
- Page 43 and 44:
Establishing nutrient intake values
- Page 45 and 46:
Establishing nutrient intake values
- Page 47 and 48:
Establishing nutrient intake values
- Page 49 and 50:
Establishing nutrient intake values
- Page 51 and 52:
Methods for using nutrient intake v
- Page 53 and 54:
Using nutrient intake values to ass
- Page 55 and 56:
Using nutrient intake values to ass
- Page 57 and 58:
Using nutrient intake values to ass
- Page 59 and 60:
Using nutrient intake values to ass
- Page 61 and 62:
Determining life-stage groups and e
- Page 63 and 64:
Life-stage groups and nutrient inta
- Page 65 and 66:
Life-stage groups and nutrient inta
- Page 67 and 68:
Life-stage groups and nutrient inta
- Page 69 and 70:
Life-stage groups and nutrient inta
- Page 71 and 72:
Life-stage groups and nutrient inta
- Page 73 and 74:
Life-stage groups and nutrient inta
- Page 75 and 76:
Life-stage groups and nutrient inta
- Page 77 and 78:
The role of diet- and host-related
- Page 79 and 80:
Diet- and host-related factors in n
- Page 81 and 82:
Diet- and host-related factors in n
- Page 83 and 84:
Diet- and host-related factors in n
- Page 85 and 86:
Diet- and host-related factors in n
- Page 87 and 88:
Diet- and host-related factors in n
- Page 89 and 90: Diet- and host-related factors in n
- Page 91 and 92: Diet- and host-related factors in n
- Page 93 and 94: Diet- and host-related factors in n
- Page 95 and 96: Diet- and host-related factors in n
- Page 97 and 98: Diet- and host-related factors in n
- Page 99 and 100: Diet- and host-related factors in n
- Page 101 and 102: Human nutrition and genetic variati
- Page 103 and 104: Human nutrition and genetic variati
- Page 105 and 106: Human nutrition and genetic variati
- Page 107 and 108: Human nutrition and genetic variati
- Page 109 and 110: Human nutrition and genetic variati
- Page 111 and 112: Human nutrition and genetic variati
- Page 113 and 114: Human nutrition and genetic variati
- Page 115 and 116: Human nutrition and genetic variati
- Page 117 and 118: Application of nutrient intake valu
- Page 119 and 120: Application of nutrient intake valu
- Page 121 and 122: Application of nutrient intake valu
- Page 123 and 124: Trade, development, and regulatory
- Page 125 and 126: Trade, development, and regulatory
- Page 127 and 128: Trade, development, and regulatory
- Page 129 and 130: Trade, development, and regulatory
- Page 131 and 132: Trade, development, and regulatory
- Page 133 and 134: Trade, development, and regulatory
- Page 135 and 136: Trade, development, and regulatory
- Page 137 and 138: Trade, development, and regulatory
- Page 139: Trade, development, and regulatory
- Page 143 and 144: Dietary guidelines and nutrient int
- Page 145 and 146: Dietary guidelines and nutrient int
- Page 147 and 148: Dietary guidelines and nutrient int
- Page 149 and 150: Dietary guidelines and nutrient int
- Page 151 and 152: Dietary guidelines and nutrient int
- Page 153: International Dietary Harmonization