foreign donations programs - PDF, 101 mb - usaid
foreign donations programs - PDF, 101 mb - usaid
foreign donations programs - PDF, 101 mb - usaid
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Countries buying commodities fff<br />
title IV dollar credits had repaid<br />
the U.S. $34.6 million through<br />
1965. The local currencies which<br />
countriesacquire when they sell<br />
title IVfood andfiber to their own<br />
citizens is usedfor economic development<br />
projects agreeableto the<br />
U.S.-such as this grainelevator in<br />
the Ryukyu Islands.<br />
1956 RECIPIENTS: Ten Years Later<br />
From the beginning of Public Law 480 through<br />
Dece<strong>mb</strong>er 31, 1965, 506 sales agreements have been<br />
signed with 60 countries. Under sales and donation<br />
<strong>programs</strong> co<strong>mb</strong>ined, 150 million tons of farm commodities,<br />
having a total export market value of $14.6<br />
billion, have been supplied to over six score countries,<br />
The first complete fiscal year cf Public Law 480<br />
operations was fiscal year 1956. By the end of that<br />
fiscal year, title I sales <strong>programs</strong> were underway with 27<br />
countries. In seeking ways to measure the effectiveness<br />
of Public Law 480, the Agriculture Trade Development<br />
and Assistance Act, one yardstick is the degree to which<br />
commercial marketing has replaced concessional imports.<br />
Even restricting consideration to imports from the<br />
United States, it is interesting to review the current<br />
picture of those countries who were recipients in 1956.<br />
Fourteen of the 27 countries were no longer receiving<br />
title I food aid in 1965 (see Table XXXVIII). All but<br />
two were receiving virtually 100 percent of their agricultural<br />
imports from the United States on full coinmercial<br />
terms. Together, these 14 had tripled their<br />
co<strong>mb</strong>ined commercial purchases of U.S. food and fiber,<br />
In 1956, seven of these countries purchased 50 percent<br />
or more of their U.S. agricultural imports on a coinmercial<br />
sales basis. In 1963, eleven of them did.<br />
Some among this group of 14 had become food aid donor<br />
nations.<br />
Even if one excludes France, Germany, and the United<br />
65-324 0-60-----8<br />
Kingdom, who in 1956 were at the end of U.S. supported<br />
postwar reconstruction, and whose current commercial<br />
purchases are very large, the remaining countries bought<br />
commercially almost $1.2 billion in U.S. agricultural<br />
products in 1965. This was over four times their<br />
commercial purchases in 1956.<br />
The remaining 13 of the original 27 recipients were still<br />
receiving title I food aid a decade later (see Table<br />
XXXIX). Nevertheless, their co<strong>mb</strong>ined commercial<br />
purchases from the Uiited States had more than doubled<br />
during the period, rising from $79 million in 1956 to<br />
$168 million in 1965. Of these 13, three countries had<br />
made the transition to title IV purchases for dollars by<br />
Dece<strong>mb</strong>er 31, 1965, and were still receiving title I shipments<br />
only as a result of agreements signed prior to 1965;<br />
an additional four countries will begin to buy under<br />
title IV during 1966.<br />
A wide range of problems confronts that group of<br />
countries still buying U.S. farm commodities under title<br />
I. Some are making encouraging, even surprising progress.<br />
Others have not yet mastered basic problems of<br />
capital formation, manpower training, and agricultural<br />
technology. Many still face difficulties in breaking away<br />
from antiquated systems of cultivation, land tenure, and<br />
marketing. Some are under relentless pressure from<br />
population increases.<br />
Despite these and other difficulties, most of the continuing<br />
title I recipients have succeeded in expanding<br />
food production fast enough to keep pace with population<br />
growth.<br />
113