22.03.2013 Views

Staring how we look sobre la mirada.pdf - artecolonial

Staring how we look sobre la mirada.pdf - artecolonial

Staring how we look sobre la mirada.pdf - artecolonial

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

REGULATING OUR LOOKS 65<br />

<strong>Staring</strong>, as <strong>we</strong> saw, is curiosity’s vehicle. Disobedient <strong>look</strong>ing at a forbidden<br />

sight especially gets you into trouble. Pandora loosed the afflictions of the<br />

world because she could not resist peeking in at them. Lot’s wife turned into<br />

a pil<strong>la</strong>r of salt because she had to have one more <strong>look</strong> at the gruesome wreck<br />

of her home. An anxious over-the-shoulder double-check cost Orpheus his<br />

beloved Eurydice. Seven murdered previous wives assailed the curious eyes<br />

of Bluebeard’s new wife as she entered the forbidden castle chamber. Eyes<br />

that will not behave seem to be our undoing. Seneca warns rightly that curiosity<br />

is an affliction in which the eyes run away with the mind. Plutarch’s officious<br />

Lamia stores her eyes in a jar at night and puts them in again by day<br />

to gawk at the affairs of others. <strong>Staring</strong> is evidence of temptation in Christian<br />

thought. For Augustine curiosity is the sin of lusting with the eyes and<br />

the first move toward the deadly sin of pride. Evil, he specu<strong>la</strong>tes, might be<br />

avoided simply by shutting “the doors of his eye,” but perpetually the eyes fly<br />

open anew, overwhelmed by curiosity. Erotic or pornographic books <strong>we</strong>re<br />

known as “Curiosa” in <strong>la</strong>te nineteenth and t<strong>we</strong>ntieth-century Eng<strong>la</strong>nd. 2 In<br />

this tradition, staring is a visual vice, a defiant delinquency met with harsh<br />

censure.<br />

Curious <strong>look</strong>ing may be a path to noble discovery, as <strong>we</strong> have seen, but<br />

equally so it seems to be a route to catastrophe or triviality. What makes<br />

inquisitive <strong>look</strong>ing threatening or heroic is also what makes it feckless. <strong>Staring</strong><br />

is the opposite of keeping your nose to the grindstone. As a craving for<br />

stimu<strong>la</strong>tion in search of a target, staring is at once purposeless and purposeful,<br />

at one moment intrusion and the next idleness. One person’s remarkable<br />

scene is another person’s mundane <strong>la</strong>ndscape. To stare, then, is to barge into<br />

someone’s p<strong>la</strong>ce. As such, curious <strong>look</strong>ing is meddlesome, prying into someone<br />

else’s life. <strong>Staring</strong> is visual snooping.<br />

CIVILITY AND DECENT BEHAVIOR<br />

<strong>Staring</strong> puts us in one another’s faces. Contemporary America has responded<br />

to this uncomfortable exposure in part by fortifying the bulwark<br />

against staring bequeathed to us by the Western tradition. A <strong>we</strong>b of regu<strong>la</strong>tions<br />

aimed at mitigating staring’s interpersonal and social threat arose<br />

in American culture from its beginnings. Codes of propriety abound that<br />

attempt to spare us from being both starers and starees. Our mothers’ emphatic<br />

importuning against staring gets its authority from a long line of<br />

conduct manuals that detail proper behavior for <strong>look</strong>ing at one another.<br />

George Washington inaugurates these cautions in his collection of “Rules of<br />

Civility and Decent Behavior in Company and Conversation,” in which he

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!