Staring how we look sobre la mirada.pdf - artecolonial
Staring how we look sobre la mirada.pdf - artecolonial
Staring how we look sobre la mirada.pdf - artecolonial
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
26 WHAT IS STARING?<br />
We build the world to accommodate the demands of seeing. Because<br />
technologies of printing supp<strong>la</strong>nted spoken voices as a way to communicate,<br />
<strong>we</strong> are awash in printed words. Forests worldwide have disappeared<br />
in the service of pulp mills. New magazines are born by the hour, and<br />
books are everywhere. We have become sedentary in part because technologies<br />
of vision now bring the world to our living rooms. With the Internet<br />
and text messaging, <strong>we</strong> connect to one another and roam a universe of<br />
information.<br />
The built environment also enforces a hierarchy of the senses. Automobiledependent<br />
cities or suburbs, for example, restrict the mobility of blind people. 5<br />
We seldom even consider the advantages of blindness, such as being able<br />
to navigate without artificial light or engaging fully with other senses such<br />
as touch and smell. Those without a sense of smell—<strong>we</strong> do not even have<br />
a common word for this deprivation—seem only mildly compromised in<br />
contrast to the blind. In fact, smell-lessness might even seem an advantage<br />
for some modern ascetic demands such as female slimness.<br />
The modern imagination, moreover, has long seized upon the dynamics<br />
of <strong>look</strong>ing as a source of narrative boldness and a vehicle for making meaning.<br />
Our preference for sight dates back to at least the c<strong>la</strong>ssical Greco-Roman<br />
burgeoning of architectural and artistic iconography that celebrates <strong>look</strong>ing<br />
as a source of knowledge. The ideal appeared in a perfectly proportioned<br />
statue or temple. But even the Greeks, with their paradoxical faith in both<br />
vision and abstraction, mistrusted the po<strong>we</strong>r of sight at the same time they<br />
celebrated it. Whereas Aristotle respected the senses, P<strong>la</strong>to worried about<br />
the po<strong>we</strong>r of images to obscure fundamental truths. The c<strong>la</strong>ssical myths of<br />
Narcissus, who was seduced and drowned by his own reflection; of Orpheus,<br />
who lost his lovely Eurydice forever by turning back to <strong>look</strong>; and of Medusa,<br />
who turned men to stone with her stare, each testify to what Martin Jay calls<br />
“vision’s malevolent po<strong>we</strong>r” (1993, 28). A founding image of our culture,<br />
Medusa’s fierce <strong>look</strong>, surrounded by threatening serpentine locks, is widespread<br />
in both ancient Greek myth and the archeological record that survives<br />
today. Medusa’s vivid story demonstrates the uneasy po<strong>we</strong>r of the stare.<br />
After the clever hero, Perseus, severed her head by using a mirror to avoid<br />
her petrifying gaze, he appropriated her po<strong>we</strong>r to vanquish his enemies and<br />
rivals.<br />
A persistent fascination with staring endures in the traditional curse of<br />
the evil eye (Siebers 1983). Like the Medusa myth, the evil eye superstition<br />
is about the primacy, and po<strong>we</strong>r, of vision. This belief in ocu<strong>la</strong>r potency for<br />
enacting evil in the world is apparently universal. From the ancient Roman<br />
oculus fascinus , the Italian mal occhio , the Dutch booze blik , to the Ethiopian<br />
ayenat , almost all cultures have a word for the evil eye (Gifford 1958, 6).<br />
Like Perseus brandishing Medusa’s head, people across cultures ward off