190%202013%20Mar_Apr

Recommendations

Info

102 11. D. Showater, ‘Prussian-German operational art: 1740-1943’, in J. Olsen and M. van Creveld, (eds.), The Evolution of the Operational Art, Oxford University Press: Oxford, 2011, p. 35. 12. The ‘Cresswell-Foster divide’ is explained in detail in M. Evans, ‘The Tyranny of Dissonance: Australia’s Strategic Culture and Way of War, 1901-2005’, Study Paper No. 306, Land Warfare Studies Centre: Canberra, 2005; also Linn, ‘America’s expeditionary war transformation’, p. 56. 13. Till, Seapower, p. 222. 14. B. Breen, Struggling for Self-Reliance, ANU e-Press: Canberra, 2008, pp. 11-22. 15. O. Kreisher, ‘Expeditionary warfare gaining new emphasis: looking at capabilities in the post-Cold War era’, Naval Forces, Vol. 27, No. 1, 2006, p. 28. 16. Global Security website 2012, ‘Exercise Reforger’: see accessed 15 July 2012. 17. L. Freedman, ‘The counterrevolution in strategic affairs’, Daedalus, Vol. 140, No. 3, 2011, p. 22. 18. US Marine Corps, Marine Corps Doctrinal Publication 3: Expeditionary Operations, US Marine Corps: Quantico, 1998, p. 3. 19. N. Elhefnawy, ‘Twenty years after the Cold War: a strategic survey’, Parameters, Spring 2011, p. 13. 20. Till, ‘The evolution of strategy and the New World Order’, p. 171. 21. G. Copley, ‘The global strategic outlook’, Defense and Foreign Affairs Strategic Policy, Vol. 39, Iss. 8, 2011,, p. 15. 22. M. Evans, ‘Towards a strategy of security: theory and practice in Australian defence policy’, in P. Dennis and J. Grey (eds.), Battles Near and Far, Army History Unit: Canberra, 2005, p. 268. 23. G. Galdorisi, ‘Expeditionary and amphibious warfare’, in S. Tangredi(ed.), Globalisation and Maritime Power, National Defense University Press: Washington, pp. 1-3: see accessed 7 July 2012. 24. J. Kiras,‘Modern irregular warfare: Afghanistan and Iraq’, in J. Olsen and C. Gray, The Practice of Strategy: from Alexander the Great to the Present, Oxford University Press: Oxford, 2011, p. 260. 25. Till, Seapower, pp. 222-4. 26. C. Wilhelm, ‘Expeditionary warfare’, Marine Corps Gazette, Vol. 79, No. 6, 1995, p. 28. 27. Till, ‘The evolution of strategy and the New World Order’, p. 166. 28. Till, ‘The evolution of strategy and the New World Order’, p. 166. 29. Galdorisi, ‘Expeditionary and amphibious warfare’, Chapter 21, p. 1. 30. US Marine Corps, Marine Corps Doctrinal Publication 3: Expeditionary Operations. 31. US Marine Corps, Marine Corps Doctrinal Publication 3: Expeditionary Operations, p. 89. 32. US Marine Corps, Marine Corps Doctrinal Publication 3: Expeditionary Operations, pp. 31-3. 33. Linn, ‘America’s expeditionary war transformation’, p. 56. 34. P. Gold, ‘Expeditionary homeland defense’, Washington Times, 17 March 1999. 35. T. Gongora, ‘Expeditionary operations: definition and requirements’, Military Technology, Vol. 28, No. 6, 2004, p. 107. 36. G. Peterson, ‘The US Navy expeditionary combat command’, Naval Forces, Vol. 27, No. 4, 2006, p. 27, and Gongora, ‘Expeditionary operations: definition and requirements’, p. 106. 37. Kreisher, ‘Expeditionary warfare gaining new emphasis: looking at capabilities in the post-Cold War era’, p. 28. 38. Australian Army, LWD-1 Fundamentals of Land Warfare, Department of Defence: Canberra, 1999, p. 81, and G. Cheeseman, ‘Army’s fundamentals of land warfare: a doctrine for new times?’, Working Paper No. 58, Australian Defence Studies Centre: Canberra, 2000, p. 5.
39. G. Hodermarsky, J. Becker and A. Arnold, The Characteristics of Expeditionary Forces, Science Applications International Corporation: Suffolk US, 2007, p. 2. 40. Linn, ‘America’s expeditionary war transformation’, p. 56 and Freedman, ‘The counterrevolution in strategic affairs’, p. 23. 41. Linn, ‘America’s expeditionary war transformation’, p. 56. 42. A. Stephens, ‘Limits of land power in expeditionary operations’, Security Challenges, Vol. 3, No. 4, 2007, p. 43. 43. Till, Seapower, p. 222. 44. Linn, ‘America’s expeditionary war transformation’, p. 61. 45. T. McKearney, ‘The dark side of expeditionary’, US Naval Institute Proceedings, Vol. 123, No. 9, September 1997, p. 68. 46. Till, Seapower, p. 249. 47. P. Dupree and J. Thomas, ‘AirSea Battle: clearing the fog’, Armed Forces Journal, 2012: see accessed 6 July 2012. 48. D. Steele, ‘Strategic reset’, Army [US], Vol. 62, No. 3, 2012, p. 58. 49. Copley, ‘The global strategic outlook’, p. 15. 103
Page 1 and 2:
Australia’s Maritime Strategy Vic
Page 3:
CONTENTS Australian Defence Force I
Page 6 and 7:
4 As usual, we have a selection of
Page 8 and 9:
6 Figure 1: South-east Asia Soverei
Page 10 and 11:
8 does this mean for a maritime str
Page 12 and 13:
10 Vice Admiral Griggs joined the R
Page 14 and 15:
12 As you have all undoubtedly obse
Page 16 and 17:
14 the word ‘choice’. Does anyo
Page 18 and 19:
16 to the school inspired by the Pr
Page 20 and 21:
18 He was the Commanding Officer of
Page 22 and 23:
20 Continental versus maritime stra
Page 24 and 25:
22 MacArthur’s island-hopping cam
Page 26 and 27:
24 As we look into the future, chan
Page 28 and 29:
26 We proved the effectiveness of t
Page 30 and 31:
28 Hornets from 75 Squadron. Our re
Page 32 and 33:
30 Reframing the Defence Discourse:
Page 34 and 35:
32 This perception is reinforced by
Page 36 and 37:
34 However, the exact nature of a d
Page 38 and 39:
36 Capability Joint Force-In- Being
Page 40 and 41:
38 or problems in capability develo
Page 42 and 43:
40 The budget debate: contextualisi
Page 44 and 45:
42 will mean that Defence may only
Page 46 and 47:
44 Counterinsurgency Lessons from t
Page 48 and 49:
46 only in a selective sense. They
Page 50 and 51:
48 Although there were miscalculati
Page 52 and 53:
50 For these tribal societies, the
Page 54 and 55: 52 10. Effendi, ‘Military Operati
Page 56 and 57: 54 An overview of strategic air pow
Page 58 and 59: 56 control, oil industry and electr
Page 60 and 61: 58 basis, the effectiveness of atte
Page 62 and 63: 60 31. T.M. Biddle, ‘Chapter 25 -
Page 64 and 65: 62 The US Submarine Campaign in the
Page 66 and 67: 64 The submarines were a mix of cla
Page 68 and 69: 66 based on sound bearings. Similar
Page 70 and 71: 68 Wolf packs. Early in hostilities
Page 72 and 73: 70 As Figure 4 shows, the submarine
Page 74 and 75: 72 NOTES 1. This article is an edit
Page 76 and 77: 74 33. Samuel Morrison, History of
Page 78 and 79: 76 Sea Control in Amphibious Operat
Page 80 and 81: 78 operations with some level of se
Page 82 and 83: 80 The forces of a major Asia-Pacif
Page 84 and 85: 82 20. This is based on the Governm
Page 86 and 87: 84 Coal 22 % Natural Gas 18 % Nucle
Page 88 and 89: 86 Japan has also worked hard to di
Page 90 and 91: 88 The most significant impediment
Page 92 and 93: 90 Other environmental and economic
Page 94 and 95: 92 NOTES 1. This is an abridged ver
Page 96 and 97: 94 45. ‘Last Japan nuclear reacto
Page 98 and 99: 96 This doctrine is an indicator of
Page 100 and 101: 98 addressing the challenges of the
Page 102 and 103: 100 contemporary strategic environm
Page 106 and 107: 104 Refocusing the Australia-PNG Re
Page 108 and 109: 106 and effort. Particularly within
Page 110 and 111: 108 as support to PNGDF operations,
Page 112 and 113: 110 NOTES 1. Comments by the newly-
Page 114 and 115: 112 Operating in a Degraded Informa
Page 116 and 117: 114 This increased reliance has exc
Page 118 and 119: 116 At the tactical level, there ar
Page 120 and 121: 118 2015. One year later, he advanc
Page 122 and 123: 120 Book reviews In Business and Ba
Page 124 and 125: 122 Starting with the Portuguese at
Page 126 and 127: 124 Dogfight: the Battle of Britain
Page 128 and 129: 126 Masters’ heartening conclusio
Page 130 and 131: 128 The impending centenary of the
Page 132 and 133: 130 highest level, and early German
Page 134 and 135: 132 Overall, the reader is left wit
Page 136 and 137: 134 It is a very personal history,
Page 138: GUIDANCE FOR AUTHORS The Australian
show all

190%202013%20Mar_Apr

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?