190%202013%20Mar_Apr
190%202013%20Mar_Apr
190%202013%20Mar_Apr
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
32<br />
This perception is reinforced by the fact that the bulk of the ADF’s operational activities since<br />
World War 2 (peace and stability, humanitarian assistance and disaster relief, and border<br />
protection activities) have been predominantly high likelihood contingencies which have had<br />
typically low consequences for Australia’s direct national security and sovereignty. However, to<br />
argue that the calibration of Defence’s preparedness posture should be based on these largely<br />
consistent operational trends spanning over half a century is likely to be flawed.<br />
Such a contention risks exposure to what Guttentag & Herring (1986) and Cornand & Gimet<br />
(2012) describe as ‘disaster myopia’: a tendency for individuals and organisations to discount<br />
certain risks, especially regarding improbable yet potentially catastrophic events, during<br />
periods of optimism and stability. As major operations conclude, Defence and the Government<br />
more broadly should be careful not to succumb to ‘disaster myopia’ regarding preparedness for<br />
a self-reliant defence of Australia campaign. Indeed, ignoring Defence’s ‘black swan’ exposes<br />
the nation to a significantly increased risk of possibly catastrophic consequence.<br />
Lyon’s (2012) ‘Asian alternative’ futures model (Figure 2) illustrates a spectrum of potentialities<br />
facing Australia in the Asia-Pacific century. It identifies a ‘coopetitive Asia’, which he explains<br />
is ‘the Asia that’s simultaneously cooperative and competitive’ (2012, p. 30), as the most likely<br />
future scenario. Moreover, to either side of his designated ‘high point’, Lyon identifies two<br />
contrasting future extremes. To the left, he identifies an increasingly cooperative Asian future<br />
which, at its extremes, he describes as an ‘Asian concert’. However, the further right one<br />
moves through Lyon’s model, an increasingly competitive Asian future leads to a ‘combative<br />
Asia’ scenario.<br />
Likelihood<br />
More cooperative<br />
Secure, liberal, prosperous Asia<br />
"Upstream shaping"<br />
1SD<br />
Coopetitive Asia = starting point<br />
Insecure, illiberal, poor Asia<br />
"Downstream hedging"<br />
More competitive<br />
Asian concert Cooperative Asia Competitive Asia Combative Asia Australian policy arc<br />
1SD<br />
Figure 2: An ‘Asian alternative’ futures model<br />
(Source: Lyon 2012, p. 30)