26.03.2013 Views

190%202013%20Mar_Apr

190%202013%20Mar_Apr

190%202013%20Mar_Apr

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

32<br />

This perception is reinforced by the fact that the bulk of the ADF’s operational activities since<br />

World War 2 (peace and stability, humanitarian assistance and disaster relief, and border<br />

protection activities) have been predominantly high likelihood contingencies which have had<br />

typically low consequences for Australia’s direct national security and sovereignty. However, to<br />

argue that the calibration of Defence’s preparedness posture should be based on these largely<br />

consistent operational trends spanning over half a century is likely to be flawed.<br />

Such a contention risks exposure to what Guttentag & Herring (1986) and Cornand & Gimet<br />

(2012) describe as ‘disaster myopia’: a tendency for individuals and organisations to discount<br />

certain risks, especially regarding improbable yet potentially catastrophic events, during<br />

periods of optimism and stability. As major operations conclude, Defence and the Government<br />

more broadly should be careful not to succumb to ‘disaster myopia’ regarding preparedness for<br />

a self-reliant defence of Australia campaign. Indeed, ignoring Defence’s ‘black swan’ exposes<br />

the nation to a significantly increased risk of possibly catastrophic consequence.<br />

Lyon’s (2012) ‘Asian alternative’ futures model (Figure 2) illustrates a spectrum of potentialities<br />

facing Australia in the Asia-Pacific century. It identifies a ‘coopetitive Asia’, which he explains<br />

is ‘the Asia that’s simultaneously cooperative and competitive’ (2012, p. 30), as the most likely<br />

future scenario. Moreover, to either side of his designated ‘high point’, Lyon identifies two<br />

contrasting future extremes. To the left, he identifies an increasingly cooperative Asian future<br />

which, at its extremes, he describes as an ‘Asian concert’. However, the further right one<br />

moves through Lyon’s model, an increasingly competitive Asian future leads to a ‘combative<br />

Asia’ scenario.<br />

Likelihood<br />

More cooperative<br />

Secure, liberal, prosperous Asia<br />

"Upstream shaping"<br />

1SD<br />

Coopetitive Asia = starting point<br />

Insecure, illiberal, poor Asia<br />

"Downstream hedging"<br />

More competitive<br />

Asian concert Cooperative Asia Competitive Asia Combative Asia Australian policy arc<br />

1SD<br />

Figure 2: An ‘Asian alternative’ futures model<br />

(Source: Lyon 2012, p. 30)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!