26.03.2013 Views

190%202013%20Mar_Apr

190%202013%20Mar_Apr

190%202013%20Mar_Apr

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

44<br />

Counterinsurgency Lessons from the<br />

North-West Frontier 1<br />

Colonel Graeme Sligo, Australian Army<br />

Introduction<br />

The British were engaged on the North-West Frontier (along the border of Afghanistan and<br />

what is now Pakistan) from 1849 to 1947, frequently involving actions against the local Pushtun<br />

tribes. 2 This article examines the counterinsurgency lessons that may be drawn from that era.<br />

Its context is political, strategic and civil-military, and is not a social or humanitarian analysis<br />

of British policies on the frontier.<br />

The article argues that, particularly from 1901 to 1939, the British were successful because<br />

of good analysis within a strategic context of ‘ends and means’; the deep local knowledge of<br />

their civil and military officers; effective civil-military cooperation and sound administrative<br />

structures; and the intelligent application of non-military and military power and influence,<br />

which included at times the application of intense military force.<br />

These conclusions are consistent with—and indeed have been influenced by—similar<br />

assessments in Christian Tripodi’s recent publication, Edge of Empire, in which he notes that:<br />

… attention was consistently focused toward resolving the fundamental demand of the grandstrategic<br />

level; the effective and calculated relation of ends and means to achieve policy objectives. 3<br />

The lessons<br />

Strategy and tactics<br />

The British were ultimately successful on the North-West Frontier because they thought<br />

strategically about what they were trying to achieve. 4 The underlying strategic context was the<br />

so-called ‘Great Game’ being played out between the British and Russian Empires for control<br />

of the East, where Great Britain perceived its overseas interests menaced by a Russian pincer<br />

movement, one prong of which was aimed at Constantinople, the other at India via Central<br />

Asia. 5 Within this context, management of the frontier was merely a ‘means to an end’—the<br />

‘end’ being the securing of British India from foreign incursion.<br />

After decades of inconclusive skirmishes, the British negotiated a border, the Durand Line,<br />

with neighbouring Afghanistan in 1893. 6 This gave the British some certainty, if not stability,<br />

in their ability to stave off any possible Russian advance through Afghanistan. Importantly, it<br />

gave them access to the major mountain passes and a sounder defensive zone. The problem<br />

then became how best to ‘manage’ the border and its fringes, a zone inhabited by a number<br />

of ‘difficult’ Pushtun tribes. The British decided that the border must not be treated in an<br />

arbitrary, linear fashion but as a more amorphous, permeable and cultural phenomenon. The<br />

result, in 1901, was the creation of a separate border zone, with its own legal regime, to be<br />

called the North-West Frontier Province.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!