29.03.2013 Views

DICTIONARY OF GEOPHYSICS, ASTROPHYSICS, and ASTRONOMY

DICTIONARY OF GEOPHYSICS, ASTROPHYSICS, and ASTRONOMY

DICTIONARY OF GEOPHYSICS, ASTROPHYSICS, and ASTRONOMY

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

not become optically thin until much of the internal<br />

energy has been converted into kinetic energy<br />

through expansion. The observed gammaray<br />

burst spectrum is then produced by internal<br />

shocks in the fireball or by shocks created as the<br />

fireball sweeps up the interstellar medium.<br />

gamma-ray burst, galactic mechanisms<br />

Prior to the launch of the Burst <strong>and</strong> Transient<br />

Source Experiment (BATSE), galactic models<br />

were the “favored” mechanisms for gamma-ray<br />

bursts. The bulk of these models involve sudden<br />

accretion events onto neutron stars or some<br />

sort of glitch in the neutron star (e.g., neutron<br />

star quakes). However, the data from BATSE<br />

revealed that the bursts are isotropically distributed<br />

in the sky, limiting galactic models to<br />

those that occur in the galactic halo. The advantage<br />

of such mechanisms is that the energy<br />

requirements for galactic explosions is nearly<br />

8 orders of magnitude lower than their cosmological<br />

counterparts (∼ 10 43 ergs). Recent observations<br />

of the optical afterglow of gamma-ray<br />

bursts, specifically the detection of redshifted<br />

lines in GRB970508, place at least some of the<br />

gamma-ray bursts at cosmological redshifts.<br />

gamma-ray burst, GRB 970508 The May<br />

8, 1997 gamma-ray burst is the first gammaray<br />

burst where a reliable optical counterpart revealed<br />

identifiable metal absorption lines. The<br />

lines are probably caused by some intervening<br />

material between our galaxy <strong>and</strong> the gammaray<br />

burst source. A redshift of the absorbing<br />

medium of z = 0.835 was inferred from these<br />

8 lines, setting the minimum redshift of the<br />

gamma-ray burst (Metzger et al., 1997). Other<br />

evidence indicates that the absorbing material<br />

was part of the host galaxy of the gamma-ray<br />

burst, placing the gamma-ray burst at a redshift<br />

z= 0.835. This gamma-ray burst provides indisputable<br />

evidence that at least some gammaray<br />

bursts are cosmological.<br />

gamma-ray burst, hypernova The hypothetical<br />

explosion produced by a collapsar, the<br />

collapse of a rotating massive star into a black<br />

hole, which would produce a very large γ -ray<br />

burst. See gamma-ray burst models, collapsar.<br />

© 2001 by CRC Press LLC<br />

gamma-ray burst models, collapsar<br />

gamma-ray burst, magnetic fields The generation<br />

<strong>and</strong> stretching of magnetic field lines<br />

have been proposed as mechanisms to convert<br />

the energy of material accreting onto a black<br />

hole in active galactic nuclei <strong>and</strong> gamma-ray<br />

bursts alike. The “st<strong>and</strong>ard” mechanism is<br />

that described by Bl<strong>and</strong>ford <strong>and</strong> Znajek (1977)<br />

which uses magnetic field interactions in the<br />

disk to extract the rotational energy of the<br />

black hole. Other mechanisms exist which extract<br />

the potential energy of the accreting matter.<br />

Gamma-ray bursts require magnetic field<br />

strengths in excess of ∼ 10 15 Gauss, which is<br />

roughly 10% of the disk equipartion energy.<br />

gamma-ray burst, mechanisms Over 100<br />

proposed distinct mechanisms for classical<br />

gamma-ray bursts exist which can be grouped<br />

roughly into three categories based on their location:<br />

solar neighborhood GRBs, galactic GRBs,<br />

<strong>and</strong> cosmological GRBs. Solar neighborhood<br />

GRB mechanisms are the least likely <strong>and</strong> calculations<br />

of the proposed mechanisms do not<br />

match the observations. Galactic models have<br />

the advantage that they require much less energy<br />

than cosmological models. However, the<br />

isotropic distribution of bursts require that these<br />

models be in the galactic halo. In addition, absorption<br />

lines in the spectra of the optical counterparts<br />

of GRBs, namely GRB970508, indicate<br />

that some bursts must be cosmological. Because<br />

of this evidence, cosmological models are the favored<br />

class of models, despite their high energy<br />

requirements (up to 10 53 ergs).<br />

The major constraint of any mechanism<br />

is that it must produce sufficient energy (<br />

10 51 ergs for an isotropic cosmological burst)<br />

with relatively little contamination from<br />

baryons. The low mass in the ejecta is required<br />

to achieve the high relativistic velocities<br />

(Ɣ = 1 + Eburst/Mejecta). Beaming of the<br />

burst reduces both the energy requirement (the<br />

energies generally quoted in papers assume an<br />

isotropic explosion) <strong>and</strong> limit the baryonic contamination.<br />

This beaming is predicted by most<br />

of the viable gamma-ray burst models.<br />

gamma-ray burst models, collapsar The<br />

cores of stars with masses above ∼ 10M⊙<br />

overcome electron degeneracy pressure <strong>and</strong> collapse.<br />

For stars with masses 25 to 50M⊙, this<br />

193

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!