29.03.2013 Views

DICTIONARY OF GEOPHYSICS, ASTROPHYSICS, and ASTRONOMY

DICTIONARY OF GEOPHYSICS, ASTROPHYSICS, and ASTRONOMY

DICTIONARY OF GEOPHYSICS, ASTROPHYSICS, and ASTRONOMY

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

supernovae, 1991bg<br />

pergiant stars. The neutrino signal (the first supernova<br />

neutrino detection) agreed well with the<br />

predicted flux from core-collapse models.<br />

However, SN 1987A brought with it many<br />

more puzzles than it did answers. SN 1987A<br />

peaked twice at much lower magnitudes than<br />

most Type II supernovae. The progenitor was<br />

indeed a supergiant, but it was a blue supergiant,<br />

not a red supergiant as was predicted by<br />

theorists. The neutron star which should have<br />

formed in the collapse mechanism has yet to<br />

be detected. In addition, images <strong>and</strong> spectra of<br />

SN 1987A revealed the presence of interstellar<br />

rings, likely to be caused by asymmetric mass<br />

loss from the progenitor star due to a binary companion.<br />

The progenitor of SN 1987A may have<br />

been a merged binary which provides an explanation<br />

for the rings <strong>and</strong> for the fact that it was a<br />

blue supergiant.<br />

supernovae, 1991bg A peculiar Type Ia supernova.<br />

Although most Type Ia supernovae exhibit<br />

very little scatter in their peak luminosity<br />

(0.3 to 0.5 magnitudes in V <strong>and</strong> B), the peak luminosity<br />

for SN 1991bg was extremely subluminous<br />

(1.6 magnitudes less in V, 2.5 magnitudes<br />

less in B with respect to normal Type Ia supernovae).<br />

The late-time light curve decay was consistent<br />

with an explosion ejecting only 0.1M⊙<br />

of nickel. In addition, its expansion velocity<br />

(10, 000 km s −1 ) was slightly lower than typical<br />

Type Ia supernovae. SN 1991bg, <strong>and</strong> a growing<br />

list of additional low-luminosity (low nickel<br />

masses) supernovae (e.g., 1992K,1997cn), may<br />

make up a new class of supernovae which are<br />

better explained by alternative Type Ia mechanisms<br />

(sub-Ch<strong>and</strong>rasekhar thermonuclear explosions<br />

or accretion induced collapse of white<br />

dwarfs).<br />

supernovae, 1993J Supernova 1993J’s<br />

early-time spectra had hydrogen lines <strong>and</strong><br />

hence, is officially a Type II supernova. However,<br />

its light curve peaked early, dipped, <strong>and</strong><br />

increased again, marking it as a peculiar supernova.<br />

Its late-time spectra exhibited strong oxygen<br />

<strong>and</strong> calcium lines with little hydrogen, very<br />

similar to the late-time spectra of Type Ib supernovae.<br />

This transition of supernova 1993J (<strong>and</strong><br />

the similar 1987K) from Type II to Type Ib spectra<br />

suggests that Type II <strong>and</strong> Type Ib supernovae<br />

© 2001 by CRC Press LLC<br />

458<br />

are caused by a common core-collapse mechanism.<br />

The progenitor of 1993J was probably a<br />

massive star that went into a common envelope<br />

phase with a binary companion, removing most<br />

of its hydrogen envelope.<br />

supernovae, accretion induced collapse (AIC)<br />

Rapidly accreting C/O white dwarfs <strong>and</strong> most<br />

OMgNe white dwarfs, which accrete sufficient<br />

material to exceed the Ch<strong>and</strong>rasekhar limit, collapse<br />

into neutron stars. The collapse proceeds<br />

similarly to the core collapse mechanism of Type<br />

Ib/Ic <strong>and</strong> Type II supernovae. These collapses<br />

eject up to a few tenths of a solar mass <strong>and</strong><br />

may explain the low-luminosity Type Ia supernovae<br />

such as Supernova 1991bg. Like the corecollapse<br />

of massive stars, AICs produce neutron<br />

star remnants, but at a rate < 1% that of corecollapse<br />

supernovae. However, in special cases,<br />

such as globular cluster where it is difficult to retain<br />

neutron stars from Type II supernovae, AICs<br />

may form most of the neutron star population.<br />

supernovae, classification Supernovae are<br />

classified in two major groups: those with hydrogen<br />

lines in their spectra (Type II) <strong>and</strong> those<br />

without hydrogen lines (Type I). Type I supernovae<br />

are further subclassified by their spectra:<br />

Type Ia supernovae have strong silicon lines (Si<br />

II) whereas Type Ib/c supernovae do not. Type<br />

Ib supernovae exhibit helium lines (He I) which<br />

are absent in Type Ic supernovae. Type II supernovae<br />

are differentiated by their light curves: the<br />

luminosity of Type II-Linear supernovae peak<br />

<strong>and</strong> then decay rapidly whereas Type II-Plateau<br />

supernovae peak, drop to a plateau where the luminosity<br />

remains constant for ∼ 100 days <strong>and</strong><br />

then resume the light curve decay. Type Ia are<br />

more luminous than Type II supernovae (∼ 3<br />

magnitudes) <strong>and</strong> occur in all galaxies. Type Ib/c<br />

<strong>and</strong> Type II supernovae do not occur in ellipticals.<br />

Type Ia are thought to be the thermonuclear<br />

explosions of white dwarfs, whereas Type<br />

Ib/c <strong>and</strong> Type II supernovae are caused by the<br />

collapse of massive stars.<br />

This classification scheme collapses the 5<br />

class Zwicky system (Zwicky 1965) to these two<br />

separate classes (the Zwicky III, IV, <strong>and</strong> V explosions<br />

are all placed in the category of peculiar<br />

Type II supernovae). In addition, supernovae<br />

1987K <strong>and</strong> 1993J exhibited hydrogen features

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!