Vatican II ABOUT FACE! - Chiesa viva

But then, which “theological qualifications” can be attributed
to “Lumen Gentium” and “Dei Verbum”?
To put it bluntly, the text of Vatican II is fairly cryptic
and mysterious, whereas, one would demand a clear writing
style for an official response to theological matters.
The theologian, therefore, would have the right to find the
official texts explicitly affirmed without any misunderstandings,
whereas, in all of the Conciliar documents (Constitutions,
Declarations, Decrees, etc…) there is not a single dogmatic
definition, nor anathema: there are even statements
contrary to them, so it seems that Vatican II does not have
any charism of infallibility. There remain only “dogmas of
faith” that were defined by other Councils “de fide.”
This is a point that one should remember well, because this
refusal to engage themselves without the charism of infallibility,
gives us the explanation for the ambiguities and, worse
yet, heresies that one discovers here and there, aside from the
catastrophes that the post-conciliar Church fell into.
Some traditionalist Fathers, who had seen the ugly turn
that Vatican II was taking, due to the content of the writings
of the two dogmatic Constitutions, - “Lumen Gentium” and
“Dei Verbum” on the role of the Holy Scriptures, - requested
a “theological qualification” to be given to those two
Constitutions; but the leaders in question refused this undertaking.
Why?
Attentively reading “Lumen Gentium” – on the Constitution
on the Church, we find the launch of an attack against
the dogmatic Constitution “Pastor Aeternus” of the Ecumenical-Dogmatic
Council Vatican I (July 18, 1970, IV session)
by Vatican II when it speaks of the Church as “people
of God” and proposes “the Collegiality” of the Bishops.
Finally, we see that the definition itself of the Church in
“Lumen Gentium” is wrong.
At N° 8, in fact, it says:
175