Ye Pleasant Mount: 1989 1990 Excavations - Open site which ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

In Table 16, the Trader Point midden data are compared with the Revised Frontier Pattern presented by Wheaton et al. (1983:271) which is based on South's Frontier Pattern (1977). The Trader Point assemblage falls within the range ofkitchen, clothing, arms, and activities groups, but it is outside the range of the Revised Frontier Pattern for architecture, tobacco, personal, and furniture. The artifact pattern at Trader Point is complicated by the diversity of site types superimposed within it. Table 16. Revised Frontier Pattern compared with Trader Point Midden. GROUP Kitchen Architecture Furniture Anns Clothing Personal Tobacco Pipes Activities Revised Range Mean Trader Point 35.5-43.8% 40.7% 43.5 41.6-43.0 42.4 29.8 0.1-1.3 0.6 0 1.4-8.9 5.0 3.6 0.3-1.6 0.9 2.6 0.1 0.1 0.3 1.3-14.0 7.9 16.3 0.5-5.4 2.4 4.1 § 101
Chapter 5. Mount Pleasant Viewed in Perspective The survey and excavations at Mount Pleasant identified several important eighteenthcentury components that provide different potential for research. It is an important Indian site because few eighteenth-century Indian sites have been excavated in Georgia or South Carolina. Even fewer have been thoroughly reported. This is especially true for sites associated with the Yuchi tribe. The archaeology ofthe Yuchi is so poorly known that archaeologists are in complete disagreement ofwhat types ofpottery the Yuchi used. Mount Pleasant is important because it is firmly identified as a Yuchi site based on early historical diaries, drawings, maps, and other records. Although by the time the Yuchi moved to Mount Pleasant there was mixture with the lower Creek tribes, much oftheir culture remained intact. The Mount Pleasant Yuchi town is an important find for gauging the archaeology ofthe Yuchi. Its discovery will be helpful in identifying other Yuchi settlements throughout the Southeast. Comparsion of Ceramics from Mount Pleasant with Other Yuchi Towns The area near the mouth ofUchee Creek, Alabama was settled by the Yuchi shortly by 1729 and no other tribes are associated with this location in historic times. Also Westo and Hogologes on the Chattahoochee may be synonomous with the Yuchi. At least six archaeological sites have been identified near the mouth ofUchee Creek in Russell County, Alabama that possibly are associated with the Yuchi. Of these, site lRu63 has been the most studied. Work on the site includes survey and test excavations by Chase (1960), additional excavations by Huscher (1958), and systematic shovel test survey by Schnell (1982). Chase's work resulted in the location of three burials, a large refuse pit, and a house floor. Burial 1 contained three small grit-tempered pottery vessels. Burial 2 contained one fine cord marked, grit-tempered pot and one incised, shell-tempered pot. Burial three contained the broken remains of one fine cordmarked shell-tempered pot with rim fillets just below the lip. Euro-American trade items were found with all three burials. The sealed house floor contained almost no brushed pottery and the collection was mostly shell tempered. Minor amounts of Ocmulgee Fields Incised and Kasita Red Filmed pottery also were found in the house. Commenting on the pottery Chase stated: the pottery was mostly shell-tempered burnished incised and plain wares occasionally with pinched rim fillets regarded generally as characteristic of the Ocmulgee Fields 102
Page 1 and 2:
Ye Pleasant Mount: 1989 & 1990 Exca
Page 3 and 4:
Chapter 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Table of
Page 5 and 6:
Figure List ofFigures, continued 31
Page 7 and 8:
Acknowledgements The author is inde
Page 10 and 11:
is not known, it may have been sett
Page 12 and 13:
Laboratory Methods All artifacts we
Page 14 and 15:
Chapter 2. History of Mount Pleasan
Page 16 and 17:
visited by Bartram was located in 1
Page 18 and 19:
Ebenezer, he purposed to quit the w
Page 20 and 21:
Uchee Creek in Columbia County, wit
Page 22 and 23:
was: "supplying some Creek Indians
Page 24 and 25:
He [Oglethorpe] stationed small gar
Page 26 and 27:
Thomas Wiggin was dead by 1756, and
Page 28:
continued to live near Mount Pleasa
Page 31 and 32:
Table 2, Continued. Artifact Summar
Page 33 and 34:
--- Area C Area D Level bluff top M
Page 35 and 36:
Table 3. Area C, Test Unit Summary.
Page 37 and 38:
Chapter 4. Excavations at Trader Po
Page 39 and 40:
Table 4. Artifact Summary, Midden,
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 46 and 47:
G ·' ;:. ,: ,': .:' . : ..... A B
Page 49:
Figure 11. Pewter .p001l8 ad iron k
Page 53 and 54:
Table 6. Ceramic Summary, Midden, c
Page 55 and 56: Tobie 7. Ceramic SU111DUIIY. FeaIUr
Page 57 and 58: Table 8. Minimum Vessel Estimate, N
Page 59 and 60: y the addition of a notched/pinched
Page 61 and 62: century, further confirming the age
Page 66 and 67: Table 10. Button Attributes. Levell
Page 68 and 69: Table 11, Continued. Glass Bead Typ
Page 70: while Mount Pleasant had fewer than
Page 74: It B Fi ur 23 En isb E em J
Page 77: Type G, which is associated with Br
Page 82 and 83: o CIII 2 Fi ure 28. Bottle lass too
Page 84: 581N SOOE 10 YR 5/4 Y.Uowish Brown
Page 92: 10 YR S/3 Brown Sand 10 YR 3/1 Very
Page 96 and 97: Feature 1. Feature 1 was a circular
Page 98 and 99: x 28 cm north-south and it was 19 c
Page 100 and 101: own sand. The feature contained onl
Page 102 and 103: Table 13. Mean Ceramic Dale Calcula
Page 104 and 105: documented period (1735 to 1757) wh
Page 108: Period pottery. The paucity of Chat
Page 111 and 112: with it. Since we know that Schremp
Page 113 and 114: Table 19, Continued. Summary of Eur
Page 115 and 116: Table 19, Continued. Summary of Eur
Page 119 and 120: Hemperley, Marion 1974 English Crow
Page 121 and 122: Kelly, A. R. and R. S. Neitzel 1961
Page 123 and 124: Smith, Marvin T. 1990 Historic Peri
Page 125 and 126: Appendix I. Glass Beads from Mount
Page 127 and 128: value for comparative purposes, and
Page 129 and 130: There is no Kidd designation for th
Page 131 and 132: Ontario. Kidd, Kenneth E. 1979 Glas
Page 133 and 134: ZOOARCHAEOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF THE M
Page 136 and 137: specimens that have been studied by
Page 138 and 139: The next largest taxon category by
Page 140 and 141: The domestic animals, pig, cow, chi
Page 142 and 143: Fort Michilimackinac fit well with
Page 144 and 145: REFERENCES CITED Anderson, Jay Alle
Page 146 and 147: Schmid, Elizabeth F. 1972 Atlas of
Page 150 and 151: Table 4. Species List, The Mt. Plea
Page 152 and 153: Table 7. Bone Measurements' (in mil
Page 154 and 155: Table 10. Element Distribution of M
Page 156 and 157:
Table 12. Element Fusion Data, Mt.
Page 158 and 159:
INTRODUCTION ZOOARCHAEOLOGICALANALY
Page 160 and 161:
Mollusca A total of 46 fragments of
Page 162 and 163:
These data allow us to draw some co
Page 164 and 165:
Analysis of butchering patterns on
Page 166 and 167:
REI ...ERENCES Aldrich, Paul I. (ed
Page 170:
Table 3. Fauna from Mt. Pleasant, F
show all

Ye Pleasant Mount: 1989 1990 Excavations - Open site which ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?