29.03.2013 Views

Ye Pleasant Mount: 1989 1990 Excavations - Open site which ...

Ye Pleasant Mount: 1989 1990 Excavations - Open site which ...

Ye Pleasant Mount: 1989 1990 Excavations - Open site which ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Period pottery. The paucity of Chattahoochee Brushed type, <strong>which</strong> is typical of the<br />

later phases of the Ocmulgee Fields period, suggested that the <strong>site</strong> was, at least in part,<br />

occupied during the earlier phase of this time. Pottery types recognized were:<br />

Ocmulgee Fields, Dallas Plain, and Walnut Roughened. (Chase 1960:3)<br />

Schnell excavated 49 shovel tests in a series of transects across the <strong>site</strong> (Schnell 1982).<br />

Schnell collected 1,241 sherds from the <strong>site</strong>. The sherds associated with the eighteenthcentury<br />

component include (in order of occurrence): plain (containing grit, sand, shell,<br />

grog/shell, sand/shell, and grit shell tempers) (88%), Chattahoochee Brushed (3%),<br />

Walnut Roughened «1%), Ocmulgee Fields Incised «1%), and Kasita Red Filmed<br />

«1%). Of the plain sherds, grit was the most common temper (61 %) followed by lesser<br />

amounts of sand (33%) and shell tempering (6%).<br />

Euro-American trade items reported from lRu63 include European ceramics, bottle<br />

glass, wrought nails, tobacco pipes, brass objects, gunflints, glass beads, brass hawks<br />

bells, brass buttons, iron buckles, and other miscellaneous iron items. This list, however,<br />

is incomplete since a majority of the collection from the <strong>site</strong> has not been analyzed<br />

completely.<br />

A simplified comparison of Indian pottery found at 9Efl69, Trader Point, and the<br />

Chattahoochee River Yuchi settlements is presented in Table 16. The Chattachoochee data<br />

is based on survey work conducted by Schnell (1982), Dickinson and Wayne (1985), and<br />

Elliott (1991). Pottery collected by Chase and Huscher is excluded because quantitative<br />

data for these sherds is not available. While these two Yuchi assemblages are generally<br />

consistent, minor variations are noted. The greater percentage of plain, or undecorated,<br />

pottery on the Chattahoochee is partially attributable to mixture with undecorated pottery<br />

from an earlier Mississippian component that was present there. The low percentage of<br />

folded, or applique rim treatments and punctations on the Chattahoochee may be a real<br />

difference, or this could reflect differences in analysis techniques. Kasita Red Filmed<br />

pottery is absent at <strong>Mount</strong> <strong>Pleasant</strong>, although these wares also are uncommon on the<br />

Chattahoochee. Even at the Kasita <strong>site</strong>, the Muscogean village where the pottery was first<br />

identified, Kasita Red Filmed makes up less than two percent of the assemblage (Willey<br />

and Sears 1953).<br />

Shell tempering appears to be more common at <strong>Mount</strong> <strong>Pleasant</strong> than on the<br />

Chattahoochee River or at Rae's Creek. Shell tempering is entirely absent in the Lower<br />

Cherokee assemblages. Shell tempering in the Trader Point tnidden ranges from 16 percent<br />

in the lowest levels to 49 percent in the upper levels. It averaged 33.5 percent throughout<br />

Trader Point. At <strong>Mount</strong> <strong>Pleasant</strong> shell tempering was observed on plain, incised, brushed,<br />

punctated, cordmarked, and folded applique rim decorations, or virtually on all types of<br />

historic Indian pottery that was found.<br />

103

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!