29.03.2013 Views

Ye Pleasant Mount: 1989 1990 Excavations - Open site which ...

Ye Pleasant Mount: 1989 1990 Excavations - Open site which ...

Ye Pleasant Mount: 1989 1990 Excavations - Open site which ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Types of European pottery recovered from Trader Point include yellow slipware<br />

(dotted, trailed, and combed varieties), delftware, Whieldonware, Astbury Ware, refined<br />

agateware, refined white salt-glazed stoneware, scratch blue stoneware, Jackfield<br />

stoneware, Burslem stoneware, and several varieties of gray and brown European saltglazed<br />

stoneware. All of these pottery types were in common use only during the<br />

eighteenth century, or earlier. Pottery imported from Europe comprised 58 percent of the<br />

ceramics in Levelland 41 percent from Level 2. In Levels 3 through 7, however, it is<br />

overshadowed by Aboriginal pottery.<br />

The most common European ware found at <strong>Mount</strong> <strong>Pleasant</strong> was English delftware.<br />

Three varieties were identified: undecorated, blue decorated, and polychrome decorated.<br />

Most of the delftware was found in the upper zone (Levels 1 and 2), but it also was present<br />

in the lower zone. Delft was uncommon in feature contexts--only two delftware sherds<br />

were recovered from features.<br />

The next most common non-Indian ceramic was coarse earthenware. This is a lowfired,<br />

predominately lead glazed ware that was used for utilitarian purposes (food<br />

processing, cooking, and storage). Similar pottery is extremely common at the Salzburger<br />

settlement of Ebenezer. As with delftware, coarse earthenware was recovered primarily<br />

from the upper zone, but unlike delftware, it was more common in features--ll sherds<br />

were recovered from features.<br />

A minimum vessel analysis was conducted on the ceramics recovered from Trader<br />

Point. This estimate was calculated using rim sherds, or body sherds in instances where<br />

unique vessel body sherds were found. A total of 72 distinctive vessels were<br />

conservatively estimated including 24 that were of Indian origin and 48 made by non­<br />

Indians. Twenty-three distinct vessels ofEuropean manufacture and 13 imported Chinese<br />

vessels were identified. Twelve vessels were either ofEnglish manufacture or were locally<br />

made by European colonists. Imponed, or non-Indian, pottery included 16 cups, 13<br />

bowls, four creampans, three plates, three teapots, one jug, one lidded bowl or pot, and<br />

eight unidentified vessels. A minimum vessel estimate of non-Indian pottery found at<br />

Trader Point is presented in Table 8.<br />

Porcelain was an expensive pottery ware during the early eighteenth century, and one<br />

might not expect it to be found on the rugged frontier. Chinese porcelain comprises less<br />

than 10 percent of the ceramics at Trader Point. By comparison, it constitutes less than 2<br />

percent of the ceramics in the Ebenezer settlement. Although porcelain was found<br />

throughout the Trader Point midden, it is most common in the upper zone.<br />

South has observed that porcelain is often found on frontier military <strong>site</strong>s, and he<br />

suggests that the use of porcelain as pan of the tea ceremony helped to maintain social<br />

stratification within these settlements (South 1977). By serving tea in fine china, the<br />

British colonists set themselves apan from the lower classes.<br />

49

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!