The Vertebrate Fauna of Jenolan Karst Conservation Reserve: Final
The Vertebrate Fauna of Jenolan Karst Conservation Reserve: Final
The Vertebrate Fauna of Jenolan Karst Conservation Reserve: Final
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Cook visited after limited installation <strong>of</strong> primitive electric lighting. In unlit caves magnesium ribbon or<br />
torches <strong>of</strong> stringybark dipped in tallow was used for illumination - a practice that had been going on<br />
since the 1850’s and undoubtedly would have disturbed the bats from the smoke and light emitted.<br />
<strong>The</strong>se observations give some indication <strong>of</strong> how the distribution <strong>of</strong> bats has changed since visitation<br />
by Europeans began, though it is possible that even by the 1880’s that some bats had already been<br />
displaced.<br />
Other reports <strong>of</strong> bats are scant, but a newspaper article describing a visit to the caves in 1898<br />
mentions bats ‘infesting’ Jubilee Cave (<strong>The</strong> Mercury 1898), a tourist cave where bats no-longer occur<br />
in any numbers. This disparaging attitude was typical <strong>of</strong> the time and likely the reason so little<br />
attention was given to reporting their occurrence.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re are anecdotal reports <strong>of</strong> large numbers <strong>of</strong> bats in Bat End Chamber prior to the quarrying <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Binoomea Cut in 1954. Tour groups would approach from River Cave and disturb the bats which<br />
would fly ahead <strong>of</strong> the tourists to the chamber, at which point the animals had no choice but to turn<br />
around and fly directly at the group. It is possible that these bats were displaced from River Cave or<br />
the numbers may have been exaggerated over time. Either way, the large numbers recounted would<br />
suggest they were eastern bentwing-bats which are not found in either location in the present day.<br />
Large guano deposits are present in the River Cave (A. Musser pers. comm.), proving that this<br />
location was at some point in the past an important site. It is unknown if this site was a maternity roost,<br />
however analysis <strong>of</strong> skeletal remains may give some clues to the historical importance <strong>of</strong> River Cave.<br />
An overall reduction in the number <strong>of</strong> bats roosting in the caves has been noticed since the 1970’s (B.<br />
Richards pers. comm.). However bats may vary roost locations seasonally and anecdotal accounts<br />
may not correspond with actual population trends. This decline corresponds with declines that have<br />
been reported across Australia during this same timeframe and may be unrelated to cave<br />
management. Removal and modification <strong>of</strong> cave gates in the 1980’s benefited cave-dwelling bats, and<br />
following this bats have recolonised some caves including Upper Imperial Cave (A Spate pers.<br />
comm.).<br />
9.2.3 Birds<br />
No birds in NSW are obligate cave-dwellers.<br />
Australian birds generally only exploit cave<br />
entrances, the cliffs above cave entrances and<br />
the twilight zone; the exception being the whiterumped<br />
swiftlet (which is predominantly known<br />
from north-eastern Australia), which uses<br />
echolocation to navigate dark caves (Coles et al.<br />
1987). However, many birds use caves for<br />
shelter and nesting and will feed on the<br />
abundance <strong>of</strong> insects typical <strong>of</strong> cave entrances<br />
(Hamilton-Smith 1965). At <strong>Jenolan</strong> Caves, the<br />
sooty owl and rockwarbler are closely associated<br />
with the caves and their populations are<br />
dependent on them. <strong>The</strong> sooty owl is a<br />
threatened species and is discussed in detail in Rockwarbler roosting in a cave. Photo © M. Schulz<br />
section 5.<br />
At <strong>Jenolan</strong>, sooty owls nest and roost in the Devil’s Coach House (Hollands 1991) and associated<br />
caves. During the current survey, owl pellets were also observed in Arch Cave and Nettle Cave. Owls<br />
favour twilight zones, not only for shelter but possibly due to availability <strong>of</strong> food such as bats and small<br />
mammals. Protection <strong>of</strong> nest sites from the sun, temperature fluctuations, wind, rain and predators are<br />
also probably important factors (Hamilton-Smith 1965). Barn and masked owls have been recorded<br />
nesting in caves elsewhere in Australia, though this has never been observed at <strong>Jenolan</strong>.<br />
Rockwarblers and superb lyrebirds are well known to favour caves and overhangs for nesting.<br />
Rockwarblers have been recorded in the Devil’s Coach House and previously nested in Nettle Cave<br />
(Hamilton-Smith 1965); though they appear to have recently declined at JKCR (I. Eddison pers.<br />
comm.). Some further examples <strong>of</strong> non-obligate cave-dwelling birds from <strong>Jenolan</strong> Caves include the<br />
welcome swallow, fairy martin, grey shrike-thrush and white-throated tree-creeper. Welcome swallows<br />
commonly nest in twilight zones and on cliff faces, as do fairy martins (Hamilton-Smith 1965). Grey<br />
shrike-thrush favour cave entrances due to high insect activity and white-throated treecreepers roost<br />
in cave entrances and have been reported foraging on insects in almost complete darkness 50 metres<br />
into caves (Hamilton-Smith 1965). Peregrine falcons, nankeen kestrels, spotted pardalotes and grey<br />
shrike-thrushes will also nest inside cave entrances (Hamilton-Smith 1965).<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Vertebrate</strong> <strong>Fauna</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Jenolan</strong> <strong>Karst</strong> <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> 113