02.04.2013 Views

The Vertebrate Fauna of Jenolan Karst Conservation Reserve: Final

The Vertebrate Fauna of Jenolan Karst Conservation Reserve: Final

The Vertebrate Fauna of Jenolan Karst Conservation Reserve: Final

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ground mammal surveys in all vegetation classes<br />

insectivorous bat surveys, in particular cave-roosting bats.<br />

2.4 BIODIVERSITY SURVEY PRIORITIES (BSP) SURVEY PROGRAM<br />

2.4.1 Systematic fauna survey techniques<br />

<strong>The</strong> systematic fauna survey techniques used for this survey are based on those developed for the<br />

Comprehensive Regional Assessments in 1997 (NPWS 1997) and have been adopted as the OEH<br />

standard ever since (NPWS 1997). In this document these systematic fauna survey techniques are<br />

referred to as OEH standard systematic survey techniques. <strong>The</strong>se techniques sample the following<br />

vertebrate fauna groups: diurnal and nocturnal birds, diurnal and nocturnal reptiles, bats, arboreal and<br />

ground-dwelling mammals and amphibians. <strong>The</strong>se OEH standard systematic survey techniques have<br />

been applied by the BSP program across the GBMWHA over the last eight years, including through<br />

neighbouring Kanangra-Boyd NP. Consistency in the use <strong>of</strong> these systematic techniques allows a<br />

comparison between fauna species detected in different vegetation communities and habitats, not only<br />

within JKCR but also across other reserves and environments.<br />

Field surveyors were supplied with field pr<strong>of</strong>ormas to facilitate comprehensive, consistent recording <strong>of</strong><br />

field data and to increase accuracy and efficiency <strong>of</strong> data entry into the OEH Biodiversity Sub-system<br />

(BSS) <strong>of</strong> the Atlas <strong>of</strong> NSW Wildlife computer database. <strong>The</strong> names <strong>of</strong> observers and recorders were<br />

noted on every data sheet to aid data verification and entry.<br />

Site Selection<br />

<strong>The</strong> site selection strategy aimed to fill the<br />

gaps identified in the gap analysis so that each<br />

statewide vegetation class present with the<br />

area was sampled in proportion to the area <strong>of</strong><br />

land it occupies. Where possible repeat<br />

sampling within each class was undertaken to<br />

provide reasonable reliability that potential<br />

variation within each stratum was captured.<br />

Such replication <strong>of</strong> sites serves to strengthen<br />

the reliability <strong>of</strong> patterns derived from collected<br />

data. An effort was made to sample the full<br />

variety <strong>of</strong> vegetation communities comprising<br />

each broad vegetation class wherever<br />

possible. <strong>The</strong> selection <strong>of</strong> sites within specific<br />

broad vegetation classes was prioritised<br />

towards filling large spatial gaps where<br />

possible.<br />

Sites were initially selected using a Geographic<br />

Information System (ArcMap 9.3) with<br />

information gained from the derived vegetation<br />

map, topographic maps, access trails, and<br />

knowledge held by park staff. Where possible<br />

sites were placed a minimum <strong>of</strong> one kilometre<br />

apart, or two kilometres for nocturnal call<br />

playback surveys. In some cases, due to the A survey site on the Six Foot Track. Photo © C.H. Barker<br />

relatively small area <strong>of</strong> the reserve and the<br />

clustering <strong>of</strong> some habitat features such as the caves, survey sites were placed closer than one<br />

kilometre. <strong>The</strong> placement <strong>of</strong> harp trap sites to sample microbats was limited by the availability <strong>of</strong><br />

suitable fly-ways, such as constrictions in taller vegetation types along roads and creek lines.<br />

Systematic surveys for bats were also performed on cleared or heavily disturbed lands as these areas<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten contained dams or open waterbodies, which frequently have high bat activity.<br />

In the field, proposed site locations were ground-truthed to ensure that they were representative <strong>of</strong> the<br />

mapped vegetation community/statewide vegetation class, that they had suffered minimal disturbance<br />

and comprised a single vegetation type. If these criteria were not met, an alternative location was<br />

selected for the site. Systematic survey sites were 100 metres by 200 metres (two hectares) in area.<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Vertebrate</strong> <strong>Fauna</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Jenolan</strong> <strong>Karst</strong> <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> 13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!