The Vertebrate Fauna of Jenolan Karst Conservation Reserve: Final

More documents

Recommendations

Info

LONG-NOSED POTOROO POTOROUS TRIDACTYLUS EPBC Act: Vulnerable TSC Act: Vulnerable Priority in Area: Nil as presumed locally extinct 66 Long-nosed potoroo. Photo © M. Pauza/ DPIPWE disappearance from the much of its former range in NSW. Occurrence in the Survey Area Presumed locally extinct. At JKCR, the long-nosed potoroo is only known from skeletal remains found at the sooty owl roost site in Nettle Cave (Morris et al. 1997). Remains were found in the surface layers and it is presumed that the long-nosed potoroo has been lost from JKCR since European settlement. Recently there have been unconfirmed sightings of a small marsupial that may fit the description of a long-nosed potoroo (Eddison 2008), however these require confirmation. The loss of the southern long-nosed potoroo from JKCR is in line with its Regional Conservation Significance The long-nosed potoroo is close to extinction in the region. It was formerly widespread but has suffered serious declines since European settlement. Within the region, the most recent sightings are all from the Illawarra Escarpment or Woronora plateau (DECC 2007). There are still small remnant populations at Barren Grounds, Jervis Bay and around Mangrove Mountain on the Central Coast. The nearest recent records are 105 kilometres to the southeast in Barren Grounds NR (2010) and 120 kilometres northeast in the Gosford region (2004). As the long-nosed potoroo is likely extinct in JKCR this reserve does not contribute to the regional conservation of the species. Threats in the Survey Area Formerly - predation by feral cats, foxes and inappropriate fire regimes. Management Considerations No management required. The Vertebrate Fauna of Jenolan Karst Conservation Reserve
NEW HOLLAND MOUSE PSEUDOMYS NOVAEHOLLANDIAE EPBC Act: Vulnerable TSC Act: Not listed Priority in Area: Low Occurrence in the Survey Area Status uncertain. At JKCR, the New Holland mouse is only known from remains found in sooty owl pellets (Hollands 1991, Morris et al. 1997). This species was not targeted during the current survey program via Elliott trapping, however no evidence was found in hair tube surveys, sooty owl pellets, camera traps or predator scats. Implementation of additional Elliott trapping may help clarify its status within the reserve. Populations would appear to be low and it is possible that JKCR provides only peripheral habitat for this New Holland mouse. Photo © N. Williams species. Alternatively, this species may have declined alongside many other small rodents from JKCR, such as the broad-toothed rat and smoky mouse, and this possibility should remain a consideration. Regional Conservation Significance The New Holland mouse is common within parts of the region, e.g. Royal NP (DECCW 2011). It occurs throughout the region, with records concentrated on the coast. Widely scattered records exist throughout the Blue Mountains (OEH 2011a), and habitat preferences and status in this area remain somewhat unclear. Given that the status of the New Holland mouse is uncertain in the reserve and the species is well represented in the reserve system elsewhere, JKCR is not considered to contribute significantly to the regional conservation of this species. Threats in the Survey Area Predation from cats and foxes; inappropriate fire regimes. Management Considerations No management required. The Vertebrate Fauna of Jenolan Karst Conservation Reserve 67
Page 1:
The Vertebrate Fauna of the Jenolan
Page 4 and 5:
Published by: Office of Environment
Page 7 and 8:
CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION............
Page 9 and 10:
6.4.12 Inbreeding..................
Page 11 and 12:
1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 PROJECT RATIONAL
Page 13 and 14:
Map 1: Location and features of Jen
Page 15 and 16:
Hydrology JKCR encompasses the uppe
Page 17 and 18:
1.3.5 Vegetation Much of the vegeta
Page 19 and 20:
wheel-driving and other motor sport
Page 21 and 22:
Multiple banding trips undertaken b
Page 23 and 24:
ground mammal surveys in all vegeta
Page 25 and 26: Bat Ultrasonic (‘Anabat’) Call
Page 27 and 28: undisturbed in situ. As agreed with
Page 29 and 30: Table 4: Statewide vegetation class
Page 31 and 32: Map 5: Location of OEH standard sys
Page 33 and 34: 3 METHODS USED TO ASSESS AND PRIORI
Page 35 and 36: Table 5: Factors used to calculate
Page 37 and 38: Common name Scientific name Reason
Page 39 and 40: species occur in the southern Blue
Page 41 and 42: The proximity of the reserve to mor
Page 43 and 44: extinct. A remnant population there
Page 45 and 46: Table 8: Comparison of detection ra
Page 47 and 48: Map 7: Distribution of introduced b
Page 49 and 50: 5.2 NATIVE SPECIES PROFILES This se
Page 51 and 52: STUTTERING FROG MIXOPHYES BALBUS EP
Page 53 and 54: FLAME ROBIN MELANODRYAS CUCULLATA C
Page 55 and 56: GLOSSY BLACK-COCKATOO CALYPTORHYNCH
Page 57 and 58: LITTLE EAGLE HIERAAETUS MORPHNOIDES
Page 59 and 60: REGENT HONEYEATER ANTHOCHAERA PHRYG
Page 61 and 62: SPECKLED WARBLER CHTHONICOLA SAGITT
Page 63 and 64: VARIED SITTELLA DAPHOENOSITTA CHRYS
Page 65 and 66: POWERFUL OWL NINOX STRENUA EPBC Act
Page 67 and 68: BETTONG SPECIES BETTONGIA SPP. EPBC
Page 69 and 70: BRUSH-TAILED PHASCOGALE PHASCOGALE
Page 71 and 72: Management Considerations Continue
Page 73 and 74: EASTERN QUOLL DASYURUS VIVERRINUS E
Page 75: KOALA PHASCOLARCTOS CINEREUS EPBC A
Page 79 and 80: PLATYPUS ORNITHORHYNCHUS ANATINUS E
Page 81 and 82: SMOKY MOUSE PSEUDOMYS FUMEUS EPBC A
Page 83 and 84: SPOTTED-TAILED QUOLL DASYURUS MACUL
Page 85 and 86: WHITE-FOOTED RABBIT-RAT CONILURUS A
Page 87 and 88: EASTERN BENTWING-BAT MINIOPTERUS SC
Page 89 and 90: EASTERN FALSE PIPISTRELLEFALSISTREL
Page 91 and 92: GREATER BROAD-NOSED BAT SCOTEANAX R
Page 93 and 94: LARGE-EARED PIED BAT CHALINOLOBUS D
Page 95 and 96: FERAL CAT FELIS CATUS Feral cat. Ph
Page 97 and 98: FERAL DOG CANIS LUPUS Feral dog. Ph
Page 99 and 100: FERAL PIG SUS SCROFA Occurrence in
Page 101 and 102: RABBIT ORYCTOLAGUS CUNICULUS Occurr
Page 103 and 104: 6.3 RELATIVE PRIORITY OF THREATS In
Page 105 and 106: 6.4.6 Environmental degradation, co
Page 107 and 108: operations (particularly during mop
Page 109 and 110: 7 MANAGEMENT OF THREATS 7.1 RECOMME
Page 111 and 112: Management response Target areas or
Page 113 and 114: Management response Target areas or
Page 115 and 116: 8 FURTHER SURVEY AND MONITORING 8.1
Page 117 and 118: esolved and projects are rarely fun
Page 119 and 120: 8.3.3 Suggested monitoring programs
Page 121 and 122: OVERVIEW Limestone karst is a limit
Page 123 and 124: Cook visited after limited installa
Page 125 and 126: adept climbers and may predate on b
Page 127 and 128:
Interference by the public Some ver
Page 129 and 130:
Predation and competition by the fo
Page 131 and 132:
can also alter the temperature and
Page 133 and 134:
Management response Target areas or
Page 135 and 136:
Management response Target areas or
Page 137 and 138:
Much of this data is then available
Page 139 and 140:
Spotted-tailed quoll The spotted-ta
Page 141 and 142:
Overall, the current study shows th
Page 143 and 144:
Common Name Morris et al. (1997) OE
Page 145 and 146:
DECC (2007) Terrestrial vertebrate
Page 147 and 148:
Keith, D.A. (2004) Ocean shores to
Page 149 and 150:
Soderquist, T.R., Traill, B.J., Far
Page 151 and 152:
Common name Scientific name NSW leg
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159:
Cave Date inspected Mattagang Cave
show all

The Vertebrate Fauna of Jenolan Karst Conservation Reserve: Final

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?