The Vertebrate Fauna of Jenolan Karst Conservation Reserve: Final
The Vertebrate Fauna of Jenolan Karst Conservation Reserve: Final
The Vertebrate Fauna of Jenolan Karst Conservation Reserve: Final
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Low: Species which either: a) have<br />
breeding, roosting, foraging and wintering<br />
habitat well represented in the regional<br />
reserve system and are subject to few<br />
threats on reserves; b) have uncertain<br />
status in JKCR and are known to be well<br />
represented elsewhere in the regional<br />
reserve system (note that the status <strong>of</strong><br />
these species would require revision were<br />
evidence <strong>of</strong> a sizeable resident breeding<br />
population detected); or c) are vagrants or<br />
extremely rare irregular visitors.<br />
Nil as Presumed Extinct: Species for<br />
which there is reliable evidence that they<br />
once occupied JKCR, but have<br />
disappeared since European settlement.<br />
Habitat trees at JKCR. Photo © C. H. Barker<br />
This includes species that are a)<br />
presumed extinct – no confirmed sightings at JKCR for at least 20 years; b) locally extinct – no<br />
confirmed sightings at JKCR or in the region for at least 50 years; and c) extinct – extinct from NSW,<br />
mainland Australia or in totality.<br />
Nil as Inaccurate Record: Species that have been assessed as incorrectly recorded in JKCR, either<br />
by misidentification, inaccurately sited records or a data entry error.<br />
3.2 METHODS FOR PRIORITISING THREATS TO FAUNA<br />
3.2.1 Identifying threats to native fauna<br />
Effective management <strong>of</strong> fauna requires understanding the threats acting upon them. This project<br />
aimed to identify current threats in JKCR, as well as those with the potential to emerge in the near<br />
future. Threats were identified by collating the following: KTPs listed under the TSC Act and/or the<br />
EPBC Act; observations <strong>of</strong> threats made during the 2011 field surveys; assessment <strong>of</strong> the<br />
vulnerabilities <strong>of</strong> priority fauna species; threats noted in published or unpublished literature; and<br />
threats mentioned during discussions with park staff and naturalists during the course <strong>of</strong> the project.<br />
3.2.2 Setting priorities for threats<br />
To enable management to be targeted to threats that pose the greatest risk to native fauna at JKCR,<br />
all threats identified were classed and ranked. <strong>The</strong>se rankings were determined by collating all known<br />
information about threats and species in JKCR and relating this to information from research and<br />
regional assessments across the Sydney Basin from the past 15 years. Ranks may require review<br />
when more comprehensive information on the conservation status <strong>of</strong> a species becomes available,<br />
further research on threats is conducted or new threats become apparent.<br />
An algorithm was developed to assess the relative importance <strong>of</strong> threats that were identified as acting<br />
upon vertebrate fauna at JKCR. This algorithm multiplied scores given to each threat for: a) the<br />
number <strong>of</strong> priority species that were impacted by the threat (species impacted), b) the eventual<br />
seriousness <strong>of</strong> that threat should it occur (severity) and c) the likelihood <strong>of</strong> that threat eventuating<br />
(risk) (see Table 5).<br />
Threat importance = species impacted X severity X risk <strong>of</strong> occurrence<br />
A ranking for the number <strong>of</strong> species that a threat impacts on was developed as follows. Note that<br />
rather than a direct calculation <strong>of</strong> how many species are impacted, weight was given to what priority<br />
that species has for conservation management within JKCR.<br />
<strong>The</strong> score for ‘threat importance’ used to split all threats into three categories – very high (score above<br />
20), high (10-19), and moderate threats (less than 10). Threats that are not currently acting within the<br />
reserve but have the potential to do so (e.g. climate change) were unranked and labelled ‘future<br />
threats.<br />
24<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Vertebrate</strong> <strong>Fauna</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Jenolan</strong> <strong>Karst</strong> <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong>