To My Family and Uğraş Uzun - Bilkent University

More documents

Recommendations

Info

-----.1940. “Ein Lykisches Motiv“, Jahrbuch Des Deutschen Archäeologisches Instituts 55: 44-57. Smith, R.R.R. 1991. Hellenistic Sculpture. London: Thames and Hudson Ltd. Starr, C.G. 1982. The Roman Empire. 27 BC- AD 476. A Study in Survival. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press. Stewart, A. 1990. Greek Sculpture. (Vol. I-II). New Haven and London: Princeton University Press. Stillwell, R. 1938. “Outline of the Campaigns. Plans I-II”. In R. Stillwell, ed., Antioch-On-The-Orontes II. The Excavations of 1933- 1936. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Stone, S. 1994. “The Toga: From National to Ceremonial Costume”. In J.L. Sebesta and L. Bonfante, eds., The World of Roman Costume. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 13-46. Strong, D. 1961. Roman Imperial Sculpture. London: Alec Tiranti. -----.1978. “The Early Roman Sarcophagi of Anatolia and the West”. In E. Akurgal, ed., The Proceedings of the Xth International Congress of Classical Archaeology. (Vol II.). Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Basımevi, 677-83. -----. 1995. Roman Art. New Haven and London: Yale University Press. -----, and A. Claridge. 1976. “Marble Sculpture”. In D. Strong and D. Brown, eds., Roman Crafts. London: Duckworth. Strzygowski, J. 1901. Orient oder Rom?. In H. Wiegartz Kleinasiatischen Saulensarkophage. Berlin: Verlag Gebr. Mann, 9. -----. 1907. “A Sarcophagus of the Sidemara Type in the Collection of Sir Frederick Cook, Bart. and the Influence of Stage Architecture upon the Art of Antioch.”, Journal of Hellenic Studies 27 (1) : 99-123. Tanyeri, T. 1999. The Nereid Monument Relief Sculptures in Review. MA Thesis, Ankara: Bilkent University. Tomlinson, R.A. 1995. Greek and Roman Architecture. London: The Trustees of the British Museum. Toynbee, J. M.C. 1965. The Art of the Romans. London: Thames and Hudson. -----. 1971. Death and Burial in the Roman World. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press. 104
Waelkens, M. 1982. Dokimeion: Die Werkstaat der Reprasentation Kleinasiatischen Sarkophagi. Berlin: Mann. -----. 1986. Die Kleinasiatichen Türsteine. Typologische und Epigraphische Untersuchungen der Kleinasiatische Grabreliefs mit Scheintür. Mainz am Rhein: Verlag Philip von Zabern. -----, P. De Paepe, and L. Moens. 1990. “The Quarrying Techniques of the Greek World”. In Marble- Art Historical and Scientific Perspectives on Ancient Sculpture. California: The J. Paul Getty Museum, 47- 72. Walker, S. 1984. “Marble Origins by Isotopic Analysis”, Archaeology 16 (2): 204- 217. -----. 1985. Memorials to the Roman Dead. London: British Museum. -----.1990. Catalogue of Roman Sarcophagi in the British Museum. London: British Museum Publications. -----.1995. Greek and Roman Portraits. London: The Trustees of the British Museum. Ward-Perkins, J.B. 1956. “The Hippolytus Sarcophagus from Trinquetaille”, Journal of Roman Studies 46: 10-17. -----. 1980. “The Marble Trade and Its Organization: Evidence From Nicomedia”, Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome 36: 325- 338. -----. 1998. Roman Architecture. London: Faber and Faber Limited. -----.1992. Marble in Antiquity. London: The British School at Rome. Weigand, E. 1914. “Baalbek und Rom, Die Römische Reichskunst in Ihrer Entwickelung und Differenzierung”, Jahrbuch Des Deutschen Archäeologisches Instituts 29: 37- 91. Wheeler, M. 1964. Roman Art and Architecture. London: Thames and Hudson. Wiegartz, H. 1965. Kleinasiatischen Säulensarkophage. Berlin: Verlag Gebr. Mann. -----.1974. “Marmorhandel, Sarkophagstellung und die Lokalisierung der Kleinasiatischen Säulensarkophage”. In Mansel’e Armağan. Mélanges Mansel. (Dizi VII, Sayı 60). Ankara, Türk Tarih Kurumu Basımevi, 345- 383. -----. 1978. “Das Sarkophagkorpus und die Erforschung der Antiken Sarkophage Kleinasiens”. In E. Akurgal, ed., The Proceedings of the Xth International Congress of Classical Archaeology (Vol II). Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Basımevi, 667- 676. 105
Page 1 and 2:
To My Family and Uğraş Uzun
Page 3 and 4:
APPROVAL PAGE I certify that I have
Page 5 and 6:
ÖZET ANTAKYA LAHDİ: BEZEK UNSURLA
Page 7 and 8:
TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT.........
Page 9 and 10:
CHAPTER VI: DATING.................
Page 11 and 12:
LIST OF FIGURES Fig. 1. Map of Roma
Page 13 and 14:
Fig. 35. Map of Ancient Antioch. (K
Page 15 and 16:
Fig. 68. Sarcophagus from Via Amend
Page 17 and 18:
Fig. 101. Diadora. 140-30 BC. Delos
Page 19 and 20:
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION The Antakya
Page 21 and 22:
Antakya sarcophagus is proposed and
Page 23 and 24:
Matz’s unfinished “Corpus der A
Page 25 and 26:
described the Iznik S (Iznik- Nikai
Page 27 and 28:
Fittschen and W. Trillmich are toge
Page 29 and 30:
The question of who owned the marbl
Page 31 and 32:
Other evidence for the high price o
Page 33 and 34:
specially for carrying marble, whic
Page 35 and 36:
The columnar sarcophagi were, there
Page 37 and 38:
type” (Morey, 1924: 29). This typ
Page 39 and 40:
certainly makes sense, given their
Page 41 and 42:
Indeed, G.W. Elderkin compares the
Page 43 and 44:
the barracks today strengthens this
Page 45 and 46:
The necklace found in the sarcophag
Page 47 and 48:
During the joint reign of Gallienus
Page 49 and 50:
4.3 Dimensions The dimensions of th
Page 51 and 52:
A (Selefkeh) (Lawrence, 1958: 289).
Page 53 and 54:
standing in the bays are at the sam
Page 55 and 56:
The rear side of the sarcophagus is
Page 57 and 58:
On the inner-acroteria of the lunet
Page 59 and 60:
4.4.6 Lid The lid is composed of tw
Page 61 and 62:
corner (Fig. 66) has slimmer propor
Page 63 and 64:
ight leg, and the left leg is at ea
Page 65 and 66:
4.5.2 Right Side The right side is
Page 67 and 68:
low relief. The right forefoot of t
Page 69 and 70:
and the left hand are entirely invi
Page 71 and 72: him. The boundary between his left
Page 73 and 74: waist level. She has calcei on her
Page 75 and 76: position. He is wearing a chiton an
Page 77 and 78: Other than the hunting side, the ot
Page 79 and 80: west allegedly after the aristocrac
Page 81 and 82: 1999: 144). On the other hand, the
Page 83 and 84: he and his wife his wife Julia Domn
Page 85 and 86: inging offerings to stelae, with or
Page 87 and 88: “Gates of Hades” through which
Page 89 and 90: The seated and standing male figure
Page 91 and 92: similar to that of the Antakya Sarc
Page 93 and 94: Hunting acquired a different signif
Page 95 and 96: theme on these sarcophagi, on Istan
Page 97 and 98: 1939: 110). Another suggestion is t
Page 99 and 100: CHAPTER VI DATING Proposing a date
Page 101 and 102: stylistic grounds difficult. The ch
Page 103 and 104: Crassus (Morey, 1924: 15). This sug
Page 105 and 106: the Antakya Sarcophagus (on the cen
Page 107 and 108: portal of the Antakya Sarcophagus.
Page 109 and 110: portrait characters and they may ha
Page 111 and 112: and the deep strong drill work appl
Page 113 and 114: craftsmen and the inspirations for
Page 115 and 116: early 3rd centuries must be studied
Page 117 and 118: Bland, R.F. 1996. “The Developmen
Page 119 and 120: Herz, N., and D.B. Wenner. 1981.
Page 121: Morwood, J. 1994. The Pocket Oxford
Page 125 and 126: FIGURES 107
Page 127 and 128: Fig. 2. Distribution map of Phrygia
Page 129 and 130: Fig. 4. Rome B (Torre Nova) Sarcoph
Page 131 and 132: Fig. 6. Antalya M (Herakles Sarcoph
Page 133 and 134: Fig. 8. Melfi Sarcophagus. 160-70 A
Page 135 and 136: Fig. 10. The Nereid Monument. c.390
Page 137 and 138: Fig. 12. Reconstruction of the Hero
Page 139 and 140: Fig. 15. The scaenae frons of the t
Page 141 and 142: Fig. 17. Marble cornice from the th
Page 143 and 144: Fig. 20. “Mourning Women Sarcopha
Page 145 and 146: Fig. 22. Istanbul A (Selefkeh) Sarc
Page 147 and 148: Fig. 24. Iznik Sarcophagus. Late He
Page 149 and 150: Fig. 26. Drawing of the front side
Page 151 and 152: Fig. 28. Drawing of the right side
Page 153 and 154: Fig. 30. Drawing of the rear side o
Page 155 and 156: Fig. 32. Drawing of the left side o
Page 157 and 158: Fig.4. Map of the Antioch Excavatio
Page 159 and 160: Fig. 36. Plan of Antioch in 1931 dr
Page 161 and 162: Fig. 38. Gold earrings from the Ant
Page 163 and 164: Fig. 44. Roman copy of Doryphoros f
Page 165 and 166: Fig. 48. Column capital of the Melf
Page 167 and 168: Fig. 52. Detail of the first bay of
Page 169 and 170: Fig. 56. The corner figure of the r
Page 171 and 172: Fig. 60. Lid on the right side of t
Page 173 and 174:
Fig. 63. Right part of the lid on t
Page 175 and 176:
Fig. 68. Sarcophagus from Via Amend
Page 177 and 178:
Fig. 71. Figure E on the Antakya Sa
Page 179 and 180:
Fig. 75. Figure J1, J2, and K on th
Page 181 and 182:
Fig. 80. Figure S on the Antakya Sa
Page 183 and 184:
Fig. 86. Reconstruction of the Athe
Page 185 and 186:
Fig. 88. Cremating and inhuming are
Page 187 and 188:
Fig. 90. Panel from triumphal arch
Page 189 and 190:
Fig. 94. South frieze of the Ara Pa
Page 191 and 192:
Fig. 97. Lid of the Sarcophagus of
Page 193 and 194:
Fig. 99. Large and Small Herculaneu
Page 195 and 196:
Fig. 102. Chrysippos, Stoic. Origin
Page 197 and 198:
Fig. 107. Satrap Sarcophagus from t
Page 199 and 200:
Fig. 109. Lid of an Etruscan sarcop
Page 201 and 202:
Fig. 111. Detail of the architectur
Page 203 and 204:
Fig. 115. Detail of the architectur
Page 205 and 206:
Fig. 119. The Adana Sarcophagus. c.
Page 207 and 208:
Fig. 122. Melos Aphrodite. 2 nd cen
Page 209 and 210:
Fig. 124. Bust of Queen Cleopatra V
show all

To My Family and Uğraş Uzun - Bilkent University

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?