To My Family and Uğraş Uzun - Bilkent University
To My Family and Uğraş Uzun - Bilkent University
To My Family and Uğraş Uzun - Bilkent University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
CHAPTER VI<br />
DATING<br />
Proposing a date for the Antakya Sarcophagus is difficult for a number of<br />
reasons. First of all, it has no inscription that might indicate a date. Second, as<br />
explained in Chapter IV, the coins found in the sarcophagus cannot be used to<br />
determine the production date of the sarcophagus. The earliest coin dating to AD<br />
241, if it was minted at Rome, does not provide a terminus ante quem. The<br />
sarcophagus could have been produced later than that date, <strong>and</strong> the deceased<br />
could have been offered an aureus kept under the possession of his/her family for<br />
years after it was issued, as it was a common practice to keep aurei as prestige<br />
objects in the 3 rd century (Bl<strong>and</strong>, 1996: 65). Likewise, the latest dated coin, that<br />
of Gallienus, dating to AD 260-1, only shows that the sarcophagus could not have<br />
been finally closed before this date. The sarcophagus could have been produced<br />
before 260-1, <strong>and</strong> could have waited to be finally closed with the other burials in<br />
it. It could also have been produced later than that date, though less likely, as the<br />
production of the Docimeum columnar sarcophagi ended around 260-70<br />
(Wiegartz, 1965: 31; Waelkens, 1982: 71), <strong>and</strong> the deceased could have been<br />
offered aurei dating much earlier than the date they died. Moreover, it is<br />
theoretically possible that the coins are from a secondary burial, especially when<br />
there is ancient damage on the lid <strong>and</strong> the chest.<br />
81