06.04.2013 Views

Architecture and Modernity : A Critique

Architecture and Modernity : A Critique

Architecture and Modernity : A Critique

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

36<br />

sensibility, 30 the second takes it up in<br />

a more radical fashion. Here Giedion<br />

opposes in an explicit manner traditional<br />

ideas such as attributing to the<br />

house an eternal value. Instead he argues,<br />

“The house is a value of use. It<br />

is to be written off <strong>and</strong> amortized<br />

within a measurable time.” 31 This is<br />

feasible, according to Giedion, when<br />

building production is organized on<br />

an industrial basis, so that building<br />

costs <strong>and</strong> rents are reduced. Houses<br />

should not look like fortresses; rather,<br />

they should allow for a life that requires<br />

plenty of light <strong>and</strong> wants<br />

everything to be spacious <strong>and</strong> flexible.<br />

Houses should be open; they<br />

should reflect the contemporary<br />

mentality that perceives all aspects<br />

of life as interpenetrating: “Today we<br />

need a house, that corresponds in<br />

its entire structure to our bodily feeling<br />

as it is influenced <strong>and</strong> liberated<br />

through sports, gymnastics, <strong>and</strong> a<br />

sensuous way of life: light, transparent, movable. Consequentially, this open house<br />

also signifies a reflection of the contemporary mental condition: there are no longer<br />

separate affairs, all domains interpenetrate.” 32 “<strong>Architecture</strong>” according to<br />

László Moholy-Nagy.<br />

(Concluding illustration in<br />

Moholy-Nagy’s Von Material<br />

zu Architektur; photo:<br />

Jan Kamman/Schiedam.)<br />

10<br />

Giedion explicitly refers in this text to<br />

Sant’Elia, whose idea it was that a house should only last one generation. In the manifesto<br />

that Sant’Elia wrote with Marinetti in 1914 it is indeed stated:<br />

37<br />

We have lost the sense of the monumental, of the heavy, of the static;<br />

we have enriched our sensibility by a taste of the light, the practical, the<br />

ephemeral <strong>and</strong> the swift. ... An architecture so conceived cannot give<br />

birth to any three-dimensional or linear habit, because the fundamental<br />

characteristics of Futurist architecture will be obsolescence <strong>and</strong> transience.<br />

Houses will last less long than we. Each generation will have to<br />

build its own city. 33<br />

Nowhere else in Giedion’s work is this concept of deliberate transitoriness so<br />

emphatically stated as in Befreites Wohnen, a book that in terms of its rhetorical<br />

structure also has the character of a manifesto. Openness, lightness, <strong>and</strong> flexibility<br />

are associated here with the other slogan words of the New Building: rationality,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!