06.04.2013 Views

Architecture and Modernity : A Critique

Architecture and Modernity : A Critique

Architecture and Modernity : A Critique

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

48<br />

49<br />

than they are. Correct measures are those that result in a minimum of<br />

ostentation. Everything else is ballast. . . .<br />

The struggle for modern architecture then is a struggle against<br />

pretentiousness, against every excess <strong>and</strong> for a human scale. 62<br />

Behind this approach is the notion that every object should be understood in terms<br />

of its inmost essence. This essence conforms to its function, to what it can be used<br />

for. Beauty exists when people succeed in giving this essence as accurate a form as<br />

possible, without any “excess” or anything that is extraneous or superfluous. It was<br />

this conviction that made the project of housing for the Existenzminimum more than<br />

a purely instrumental answer to the housing situation. 63 The architects of the New<br />

Building were not only interested in the program of housing for the underprivileged<br />

classes for extrinsic, social reasons. They also saw it as an opportunity to realize an<br />

ascetic ideal—housing reduced to its essence, pure, minimal, <strong>and</strong> authentic.<br />

In the course of time, however, a slight shift of emphasis in the issues of Das<br />

Neue Frankfurt became apparent. During the early years virtually no attempt was<br />

made to analyze the economic <strong>and</strong> social aspects of housing policy in Frankfurt: they<br />

were apparently regarded as self-evident aspects of the struggle to create a new culture.<br />

Gradually, however, these themes began to be treated independently of the cultural<br />

context, as autonomous problems. In 1928, for instance, in the special issue<br />

about housing, the necessity of rationality <strong>and</strong> functionality in housing design was<br />

still defended on the grounds of a general concept of dwelling culture, while in 1929<br />

in the issue on billige Wohnungen (cheap housing), published on the occasion of the<br />

CIAM congress in Frankfurt, much more stress was laid on hygiene <strong>and</strong> on social <strong>and</strong><br />

economic arguments. 64 Unquestionably, the economic crisis had forced architecture<br />

to concentrate more on economic necessities,<br />

<strong>and</strong> this led to a more pronounced consideration<br />

of building costs. 65 Cover of Das Neue Frankfurt,<br />

After 1929,<br />

January 1928.<br />

when the consequences of the economic<br />

crisis clearly began to make themselves felt,<br />

public housing was treated primarily as an<br />

economic <strong>and</strong> financial problem, <strong>and</strong> rationality<br />

<strong>and</strong> functionality in design was mainly<br />

thought of in terms of cost-effectiveness.<br />

Even so, functionalism in Das Neue<br />

Frankfurt continued to be seen as part of<br />

a project for emancipation. It was the aim<br />

of May <strong>and</strong> his associates to provide the<br />

mass of people on the housing lists with<br />

decent accommodation that would free<br />

them from intolerable living conditions.<br />

These new homes would allow them to en-<br />

17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!