10.04.2013 Views

pdf 25 MB - BSBI Archive

pdf 25 MB - BSBI Archive

pdf 25 MB - BSBI Archive

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

BRITISH ASSOCIAIION, MEETING AT EXETER. 291<br />

lions put upon tliem. That he could not do, and he should therefore<br />

retire.—Dr. Wilkes considered Mr. Darwin a great observer, but by no<br />

means an inductive reasoner.—Mr. E. Vivian pointed out that all the<br />

old landmarks had been removed, and proceeded to make a few state-<br />

ments with regard to Kent's Cavern. He believed scientific and reli-<br />

gious men diifered in degree, and not in principle. There was no<br />

possibility of stopping short of man being contemporaneous with the<br />

fossil animals, and, in fact, preglacial. He had always believed that<br />

Moses had written a cosmogony, and he did not yet doubt that it<br />

would be in some way reconciled with science. There had been a<br />

very wide interchange of species, and when they admitted development<br />

they must have a number of separate acts of creation, of which there<br />

was no evidence.—Mr. Wallace did not consider that any one of the<br />

the papers ought to have been read in that place. If the opponents of<br />

Darwinism wished to come forward, let them bring either new facts or<br />

new arguments.—The President considered the most pertinent obser-<br />

vations that had been made with regard to Darwinism came from Mr.<br />

Vivian. He had rightly said that the great difficulty was to account<br />

for existing animals. How were they to account for their difference<br />

from former ones ? Either the elephant must be a spontaneous crea-<br />

tion, or was the result of descent. Neither of the writers of the papers<br />

knew what Darwinism was, although really it might have been ex-<br />

pected that they would have informed themselves about it before they<br />

wrote.—Dr. M'Cann explained that he had read the books to which<br />

Professor Huxley had referred, and said, moreover, that the question<br />

had been shirked.<br />

" 0)1 an Alteration in the Structure of Lychnis dioica, observed in<br />

connection icith the Development of a Parasitic Fun(jus." By Miss<br />

]5ecker. While residing near Accrington, in Lancashire, Miss Becker<br />

was struck with the remarkable appearance of certain plants of Lychnis<br />

dioica, which, instead of the usual straw-coloured anthers, displayed a<br />

purple mark in the centre of the flower, giving the effect of a handsome<br />

dark eye. Further examination showed that, contrary to the usual<br />

habit of the plant, many of them were bisexual, each flower containing<br />

a pistil as well as stamens ; except for the shortness of the styles, these<br />

pistils were as well developed as those of ordinary female plants. In<br />

I860 she sent a few flowers to Mr. Charles Darwin, who, after<br />

submitting ihe flower to microscopic investigation, wrote, " The

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!