10.04.2013 Views

pdf 25 MB - BSBI Archive

pdf 25 MB - BSBI Archive

pdf 25 MB - BSBI Archive

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

292 BRITISH ASSOCIATION, MEETING AT EXETER.<br />

dark purple anthers are a mass of some Cryptogamic plant, allied, T<br />

suppose, to the smut of Wheat. .<br />

In tjie bud the pollen grains can be<br />

distinguished, afterwards they are wholly corrupted. There remains a<br />

pretty case of a reversion from a dioecious to a hermaphrodite con-<br />

dition." Subsequently he suggested that the plants might be natural<br />

hybrids. The impression crossed his mind thatj the pollen being de-<br />

stroyed at an early period, the ovarium was developed in compensation.<br />

Miss Becker pursued her observations, and to account for the appear-<br />

ances she had two theories :— 1. That the bisexual plants were cases<br />

of natural reversion to the original form, and that their association<br />

with the fungus disease was accidental. 2. That the parasitic fungus<br />

caused the flowers to assume the bisexual form. She maintained the<br />

last of the two to be the right one. Entering into many considera-<br />

tions in support of her view, she suggested that it might be an instance<br />

in illustration of Darwin's theory of Pangenesis. Dr. Dickson thought<br />

Miss Becker's theory unsupported by the evidence. Precedent disease<br />

of the LycJmis was the probable cause of the fungus growing in it.<br />

Dr. Wilkes questioned the notion that a fungus parasite could help in<br />

developing the organs of a plant.— Professor Balfour, while acknow-<br />

ledging the excellence of the paper, disagreed with Miss Becker's con-<br />

clusion. If Miss Becker was right, the instance was the first known<br />

to the botanical world.—Miss Becker replied cleverly. Perhaps it was<br />

the first instance, but why might not she make the first discovery of<br />

it ? She was (piite prepared to hear that they disagreed with her view,<br />

for, as far as she had observed, that section was remarkable for this,<br />

that everybody disagreed with everybody else. [Compare leading article<br />

in 'Gardeners' Chronicle,' Sept. <strong>25</strong>, 1869, on this subject. Ed.]<br />

" On the Relative Value of the Characters employed in the Classijica-<br />

tioH of Plants.'' By Dr. Maxwell T. Masters. This paper was de-<br />

voted to the consideration of some of the means employed by botanists<br />

in elaborating the "natural" systems of classification, and to the esti-<br />

mation of the relative value to be attached to these means. The cha-<br />

racters treated of were the following :— 1, characters derived from the<br />

relative frequency of occurrence of a particular form, or a particidar<br />

aiTangement of organs ; 2, developmental characters, whether " conge-<br />

nital" or "acquired;" 3, teratological characters; 4, rudimentary<br />

characters; 5, special physiological characters; 6, eluiracters dependent<br />

on geographical distribulion. Illustrations were given in explanation<br />

—<br />

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!