Elsevier Editorial System(tm) for Mycological ... - Clark University

More documents

Recommendations

Info

$Subspaces of Vector Spaces Math 130 Linear Algebra$

Thallus monocentric or polycentric; anaerobic, found in digestive system of larger herbivorous mammals and possibly in other terrestrial and aquatic anaerobic environments; lacks mitochondria but contains hydrogenosomes of mitochondrial origin; zoospores posteriorly unflagellate or polyflagellate, kinetosome present but non- functional centriole absent, kinetosome-associated complex composed of a skirt, strut, spur and circumflagellar ring, microtubules extend from spur and radiate around nucleus, forming a posterior fan, flagellar props absent; nuclear envelope remains intact throughout mitosis. Class: Neocallimastigomycetes M. J. Powell, class. nov. MycoBank no.: MB 501280 Diagnosis latina ut in Neocallimastigomycota (vide supra). Typus: Neocallimastix Vavra & Joyon ex I.B. Heath 1983. Order: Neocallimastigales J. L. Li, I. B. Heath & L. Packer, Can. J. Bot. 71: 403 (1993). Exemplar genera: Neocallimastix Vavra & Joyon ex I.B. Heath 1983, Caecomyces J.J. Gold 1988, Orpinomyces D.J.S. Barr, H. Kudo, Jakober & K.J. Cheng 1989. Phylum: Blastocladiomycota T. Y. James, Mycologia 98: XXX (2007) [”2006”]. Synonym: Allomycota Caval.-Sm., BioSystems 14: 465 (1981).This phylum was proposed to reflect phylogenetic information from a number of molecular studies (James et al. 2007; Liu et al. 2006). Equivalent to Class: Blastocladiomycetes T. Y. James, Mycologia 98: XXX (2007) [”2006”]. 20
Synonym: Allomycetes Caval.-Sm., Biol. Rev. 73: 246 (1998), based on Allomyces E. J. Butler 1911. Cavalier-Smith provided a brief, five-word Latin description for Allomycetes that is not diagnostic from other uniflagellate fungi. The name Allomycetes was not taken up, because it is appropriate to have a class name based on the same genus as an included ordinal name, and because Cavalier-Smith’s “diagnosis” was vague. Order: Blastocladiales H. E. Petersen, in Kanouse, Am. J. Bot. 14: 295 (1927). Exemplar genera: Allomyces E.J. Butler 1911, Blastocladia Reinsch 1877, Coelomomyces Keilin. 1921. Phylum: Microsporidia Balbiani C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 95: 1168 (1882). The nomenclatural status of Microsporidia is ambiguous. It has been treated as a phylum under the zoological Code (International Comission on Zoological Nomenclature 1999), but there is disagreement about the correct author citation (Larsson 2000; Sprague & Becnel 1998), and it is uncertain if the name would be valid under the botanical Code. This uncertainty arises as Microsporidium Balbiani 1884 appears to be a later synonym of Nosema Naegeli 1857. The present work follows the recommendation of Sprague & Becnel (1998) in attributing Microsporidia to Balbiani (1882), but this must be regarded as provisional. Before the status of the Microsporidia can be resolved, it will be necessary to decide whether the nomenclature of the group as a whole should be governed by the zoological or the botanical Code although the latter now allows names of fungi described under the zoological Code to be accepted. The final decision will require input from the community of scientists who study Microsporidia. 21
Page 1 and 2: Elsevier Editorial System(tm) for M
Page 3 and 4: Cover Letter February 8, 2007 Dr. D
Page 5 and 6: A higher-level phylogenetic classif
Page 7 and 8: 18 Institute of Applied Ecology, Ch
Page 9 and 10: 47 Systematic Mycology and Lichenol
Page 11 and 12: classifications. Two important work
Page 13 and 14: promote communication and awareness
Page 15 and 16: summarized in Tables 1-3, which lis
Page 17 and 18: Pucciniomycotina, and Ustilaginomyc
Page 19 and 20: Many of the citations and authoriti
Page 21 and 22: Class: Chytridiomycetes Caval.-Sm.,
Page 23: ibosomal aggregation, and rumposome
Page 27 and 28: Order: Paraglomerales C. Walker & A
Page 29 and 30: Fungi pathogenici obligate animalib
Page 31 and 32: Synonym: Zoopagales Bessey, Morph.
Page 33 and 34: Unicellular or filamentous Fungi, l
Page 35 and 36: Class: Pneumocystidomycetes O. E. E
Page 37 and 38: Order: Dothideales Lindau, in Engle
Page 39 and 40: Lichenized, parasitic, and saprobic
Page 41 and 42: Order: Onygenales Cif. ex Benny & K
Page 43 and 44: vel infirme ramosae, septatae, medi
Page 45 and 46: Exemplar genera: Coccocarpia Pers.
Page 47 and 48: Lecanoromycetes incertae sedis (not
Page 49 and 50: Based on current character and taxo
Page 51 and 52: Order: Coronophorales Nannf., Nova
Page 53 and 54: Order: Coniochaetales Huhndorf, A.
Page 55 and 56: Exemplar genera: Huangshania O. E.
Page 57 and 58: Order: Cystobasidiales R. Bauer, Be
Page 59 and 60: Exemplar genera: Microbotryum Lév.
Page 61 and 62: Class: Ustilaginomycetes R. Bauer,
Page 63 and 64: Emend. Bauer, Oberwinkler & Vánky,
Page 65 and 66: Order: Cystofilobasidiales Fell, Ro
Page 67 and 68: Order: Agaricales Underw., Moulds,
Page 69 and 70: phylogenetics of Cantharellales. An
Page 71 and 72: cylindrical or suballantoid, with t
Page 73 and 74: subicular hyphae with or without am
Page 75 and 76:
REFERENCES 1 Adl SM, Simpson AGB, F
Page 77 and 78:
Begerow D, Bauer R, Oberwinkler F,
Page 79 and 80:
Clements FE, Shear CL. 1931. The Ge
Page 81 and 82:
Galagan JE, Henn MR, Ma L-J, Cuomo
Page 83 and 84:
Lecanoromycetes (Ascomycota). Molec
Page 85 and 86:
Keeling PJ, 2003. Congruent evidenc
Page 87 and 88:
Lindau G, 1896. Hysteriineae. In: E
Page 89 and 90:
Margulis L, Corliss JO, Melkonian M
Page 92 and 93:
Nannfeldt JA, 1932. Studien über d
Page 94 and 95:
Sampaio JP, Gadanho M, Bauer R, Wei
Page 96 and 97:
Sugiyama J, Hosaka K, Suh S-O, 2007
Page 98 and 99:
Glomeromycota. Mycological Research
Page 100 and 101:
Sordariomycetes systematics: An ove
Page 102 and 103:
MICROSPORIDIA Kickxellales Dimargar
Page 104 and 105:
Agaricostilbales Agaricostilbomycet
Page 106 and 107:
James et al. (2007) lsu, ssu, 5.8S
Page 108 and 109:
Table 2. Support for major groups o
Page 110 and 111:
MPbs < 50 SC Dothideomycetidae Scho
Page 112 and 113:
4 Bpp = 1.00 MLbs = 100 WPbs > 70 9
Page 114 and 115:
pb2, tef1 MLbs = 93 Bpp = 1.00 Miad
Page 116 and 117:
Reeb et al. (2004, fig. 1) lsu, ssu
Page 118 and 119:
tef1 WPbs = 96 MLbs = 90 Bpp = 1.00
Page 120 and 121:
Bpp = 1.00 Miller & Huhndorf (2005,
Page 122 and 123:
Table 3. Support for major groups o
Page 124 and 125:
Sampaio (2004, fig. 1) lsu 7 Bpp =
Page 126 and 127:
O Ustilaginales Matheny et al. (200
Page 128 and 129:
pb2, tef1 MPbs = 50-69 Fell et al.
Page 130:
Larsson et al. (2007, fig. 3) lsu,
show all

Elsevier Editorial System(tm) for Mycological ... - Clark University

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?