Elsevier Editorial System(tm) for Mycological ... - Clark University

More documents

Recommendations

Info

$Subspaces of Vector Spaces Math 130 Linear Algebra$

Exemplar genera: Gomphus (Fr.) Weinm. 1826, Gautieria Vittad. 1831, Ramaria Holmsk. 1790. Order: Hysterangiales K. Hosaka & Castellano, Mycologia 98: XXX (2007) [”2006”]. Exemplar genera: Hysterangium Vittad. 1831, Phallogaster Morgan 1893, Gallacea Lloyd 1905, Austrogautieria E. L. Stewart & Trappe 1985. Order: Phallales E. Fisch., in Engler & Prantl (eds), Nat. Pflanzenfam. 1(1**): 276 (1898). Equivalent to Phallomycetidae Locq. (Locquin 1984), which was invalidly published, owing to the absence of a Latin diagnosis. Exemplar genera: Phallus Junius ex L. 1753, Clathrus P. Micheli ex L. 1753, Claustula K. M. Curtis 1926. Agaricomycetes incertae sedis (not placed in any subclass): Order: Auriculariales J. Schröt., in Cohn (ed.), Krypt.-Fl. Schlesien 1: 382 (1889). Trotter 1913. Exemplar genera: Auricularia Bull. ex Juss. 1789, Exidia Fr. 1822, Bourdotia (Bres.) Order: Cantharellales Gäum., Vergl. Morph. Pilze: 495 (1926). Equivalent to the cantharelloid clade (Hibbett & Thorn 2001; Moncalvo et al. 2007). The Cantharellales as delimited here includes Tulasnella, which is distinguished by unusual basidia with inflated sterigmata, and has been classified in a separate order, Tulasnellales Rea 1922 (e.g. Weiß et al. 2004). Extreme evolutionary rate heterogeneity in the nuclear ribosomal RNA genes of Tulasnella, Cantharellus and Craterellus is a source of error in 64
phylogenetics of Cantharellales. Analyses of Matheny et al. (2006b) suggest that Tulasnella is nested within the Cantharellales, but it could also be the sister group to Cantharellales s.str. (Moncalvo et al. 2007). If so, then it may be appropriate to segregate Tulasnellales from Cantharellales s.str. Exemplar genera: Cantharellus Fr. 1821, Botryobasidium Donk 1931, Craterellus Pers. 1825, Tulasnella J. Schröt. 1888. Order: Corticiales K. H. Larss., ord. nov. MycoBank no.: MB 501299 Basidiomata resupinata, effuso-reflexa vel discoidea; hymenophora laevia; systema hypharum monomiticum; dendrohyphidia raro absentia; basidia saepe e probasidiis oriuntur. Cystidia presentia vel absentia. Sporae hyalinae, tenuitunicatae, albae vel aggregatae roseae. Typus: Corticium Pers. 1794. Basidiomycetes with effused or discoid (Cytidia) basidiomata, a smooth hymenophore, and a monomitic hyphal system with clamped, rarely simple-septate, hyphae. Dendrohyphidia common. Species with or without cystidia. A probasidial resting stage is present in many species. Spores smooth, in masses white to pink. Saprotrophic, parasitic, or lichenicolous. Equivalent to Vuilleminiales Boidin, Mugnier & Canales 1998 and the corticioid clade (Binder et al. 2005; Larsson et al. 2004). Boidin et al. (1998) explicitly included Corticium in their new order, as a member of the family Vuilleminiaceae Maire 1902. Jülich (1981) also placed Corticium in Vuilleminiaceae but referred them to Aleurodiscales Jülich 1981. Corticium is the type of Corticiaceae Herter 1910, a family name conserved 65
Page 1 and 2:
Elsevier Editorial System(tm) for M
Page 3 and 4:
Cover Letter February 8, 2007 Dr. D
Page 5 and 6:
A higher-level phylogenetic classif
Page 7 and 8:
18 Institute of Applied Ecology, Ch
Page 9 and 10:
47 Systematic Mycology and Lichenol
Page 11 and 12:
classifications. Two important work
Page 13 and 14:
promote communication and awareness
Page 15 and 16:
summarized in Tables 1-3, which lis
Page 17 and 18: Pucciniomycotina, and Ustilaginomyc
Page 19 and 20: Many of the citations and authoriti
Page 21 and 22: Class: Chytridiomycetes Caval.-Sm.,
Page 23 and 24: ibosomal aggregation, and rumposome
Page 25 and 26: Synonym: Allomycetes Caval.-Sm., Bi
Page 27 and 28: Order: Paraglomerales C. Walker & A
Page 29 and 30: Fungi pathogenici obligate animalib
Page 31 and 32: Synonym: Zoopagales Bessey, Morph.
Page 33 and 34: Unicellular or filamentous Fungi, l
Page 35 and 36: Class: Pneumocystidomycetes O. E. E
Page 37 and 38: Order: Dothideales Lindau, in Engle
Page 39 and 40: Lichenized, parasitic, and saprobic
Page 41 and 42: Order: Onygenales Cif. ex Benny & K
Page 43 and 44: vel infirme ramosae, septatae, medi
Page 45 and 46: Exemplar genera: Coccocarpia Pers.
Page 47 and 48: Lecanoromycetes incertae sedis (not
Page 49 and 50: Based on current character and taxo
Page 51 and 52: Order: Coronophorales Nannf., Nova
Page 53 and 54: Order: Coniochaetales Huhndorf, A.
Page 55 and 56: Exemplar genera: Huangshania O. E.
Page 57 and 58: Order: Cystobasidiales R. Bauer, Be
Page 59 and 60: Exemplar genera: Microbotryum Lév.
Page 61 and 62: Class: Ustilaginomycetes R. Bauer,
Page 63 and 64: Emend. Bauer, Oberwinkler & Vánky,
Page 65 and 66: Order: Cystofilobasidiales Fell, Ro
Page 67: Order: Agaricales Underw., Moulds,
Page 71 and 72: cylindrical or suballantoid, with t
Page 73 and 74: subicular hyphae with or without am
Page 75 and 76: REFERENCES 1 Adl SM, Simpson AGB, F
Page 77 and 78: Begerow D, Bauer R, Oberwinkler F,
Page 79 and 80: Clements FE, Shear CL. 1931. The Ge
Page 81 and 82: Galagan JE, Henn MR, Ma L-J, Cuomo
Page 83 and 84: Lecanoromycetes (Ascomycota). Molec
Page 85 and 86: Keeling PJ, 2003. Congruent evidenc
Page 87 and 88: Lindau G, 1896. Hysteriineae. In: E
Page 89 and 90: Margulis L, Corliss JO, Melkonian M
Page 92 and 93: Nannfeldt JA, 1932. Studien über d
Page 94 and 95: Sampaio JP, Gadanho M, Bauer R, Wei
Page 96 and 97: Sugiyama J, Hosaka K, Suh S-O, 2007
Page 98 and 99: Glomeromycota. Mycological Research
Page 100 and 101: Sordariomycetes systematics: An ove
Page 102 and 103: MICROSPORIDIA Kickxellales Dimargar
Page 104 and 105: Agaricostilbales Agaricostilbomycet
Page 106 and 107: James et al. (2007) lsu, ssu, 5.8S
Page 108 and 109: Table 2. Support for major groups o
Page 110 and 111: MPbs < 50 SC Dothideomycetidae Scho
Page 112 and 113: 4 Bpp = 1.00 MLbs = 100 WPbs > 70 9
Page 114 and 115: pb2, tef1 MLbs = 93 Bpp = 1.00 Miad
Page 116 and 117: Reeb et al. (2004, fig. 1) lsu, ssu
Page 118 and 119:
tef1 WPbs = 96 MLbs = 90 Bpp = 1.00
Page 120 and 121:
Bpp = 1.00 Miller & Huhndorf (2005,
Page 122 and 123:
Table 3. Support for major groups o
Page 124 and 125:
Sampaio (2004, fig. 1) lsu 7 Bpp =
Page 126 and 127:
O Ustilaginales Matheny et al. (200
Page 128 and 129:
pb2, tef1 MPbs = 50-69 Fell et al.
Page 130:
Larsson et al. (2007, fig. 3) lsu,
show all

Elsevier Editorial System(tm) for Mycological ... - Clark University

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?