DOLOMITES - Annexes 2-8 - Provincia di Udine
DOLOMITES - Annexes 2-8 - Provincia di Udine
DOLOMITES - Annexes 2-8 - Provincia di Udine
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
NOMINATION OF THE <strong>DOLOMITES</strong> FOR INSCRIPTION ON THE WORLD NATURAL HERITAGE LIST UNESCO<br />
15<br />
(Moena), suggested the Triassic age of the basaltic volcanites and suggested that the faults and folds<br />
spectacularly visible in the area were the result of tangential compressive forces more than the product<br />
of the vertical <strong>di</strong>splacement suggested by the von Buch’s Erhebungs theory. Wilhelm Fuchs, Agordo<br />
Mine geologist, published (1814) a synthesis of the northern Dolomites (Ba<strong>di</strong>a Valley) geology<br />
and a first accurate geological map of the area. Graf Georg zu Münster (1776-1844) described the<br />
faunae of the argillaceous limestones from the San Cassiano Formation (1834, 1841), revealing the<br />
apparently bottomless richness of this late La<strong>di</strong>nian-early Carnian basinal formation.<br />
Palaeontology works put the base of the modern ammonoid and pelagic pelecypods based biostratigraphy<br />
of the Tethyan Triassic.<br />
At the publication time of these contributions, major developments in the genetic understan<strong>di</strong>ng of<br />
the carbonate platforms were developing. The German geologist Fer<strong>di</strong>nand von Richthofen (1833-<br />
1905) at the age of 26, interpreted the Dolomites platforms as organic coral reefs from ancient tropical<br />
seas (1860), drew accurate geological profiles of the western Dolomites platform and inferred<br />
the role of the subsidence in the accumulation of thick piles of shallow water carbonates. An further<br />
milestone in the Earth Science development was the publication, by Johan August Edmund von Mojsisovics<br />
(1839-1907) of “Die Dolomitriffe von Südtirol und Venetien” (1879), a book illustrated by<br />
some of the first spectacular photographs of the region and by an accurate geological map at the 1:75<br />
000 scale. The nobleman confirmed the accuracy of von Richthofen interpretation and synthesised<br />
an accurate interpretation of the depositional geometry and stratigraphic architectures of the platforms,<br />
largely accepted even today. He interpreted the horizontally bedded nuclei of platforms as aggra<strong>di</strong>ng<br />
lagoon, shallow-water, algal-rich se<strong>di</strong>ments, flanked by massive reefs bo<strong>di</strong>es and by large volumes<br />
of slope brecciae. Despite lacking any knowledge of the modern tropical slopes, he brilliantly<br />
interpreted the steep clinostratifications as Ueberguss-Schichten (primarily inclined beds), associated<br />
to the slope growth. Against the accepted wisdom, he clearly stated that coeval, adjacent platform<br />
and basinal deposits can have very <strong>di</strong>fferent facies (Facies Heteropie). He sub<strong>di</strong>vided the large carbonate<br />
platform bo<strong>di</strong>es accor<strong>di</strong>ng to the interfingering ammonoid-bearing basinal units. What we now<br />
consider as Anisian-La<strong>di</strong>nian pre-volcanic platforms were named Buchensteiner Riff, from the coeval<br />
Buchenstein Formation (Livinallongo Fm). The syn-early post volcanic platform were named Wengener<br />
Riff, the younger Cassianer, accor<strong>di</strong>ng to their interfingering with the San Cassiano basinal<br />
formation. From a structural point of view, he considered the Southern Alps as a stair like systems of<br />
brittle basement blocks, separated by high angle faults, lowering the southerner portion. High angle<br />
faults is often what you can actually see in the field, even if now we recognize a number of important<br />
Historical geological cross-section from the Sciliar/Schlern area to the left to the Sella by F. von Richthofen, 1860.