07.06.2013 Views

Residential Foreclosures in the City of Buffalo, 1990-2000 - Federal ...

Residential Foreclosures in the City of Buffalo, 1990-2000 - Federal ...

Residential Foreclosures in the City of Buffalo, 1990-2000 - Federal ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chart 2<br />

Unemployment Rate: <strong>Buffalo</strong>-Niagara Metropolitan Statistical Area<br />

and <strong>the</strong> Nation: <strong>1990</strong>-2002<br />

Percent<br />

8<br />

7<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

<strong>1990</strong><br />

91<br />

92<br />

93<br />

Source: U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Labor.<br />

94<br />

95<br />

96<br />

97<br />

98<br />

99<br />

<strong>Buffalo</strong><br />

United States<br />

00<br />

<strong>City</strong> Economic Conditions<br />

Although <strong>the</strong> city <strong>of</strong> <strong>Buffalo</strong> did not suffer from a severe shock to <strong>the</strong> regional economy<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>1990</strong>s, it cont<strong>in</strong>ued to house a disproportionate share <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> metro area’s low<strong>in</strong>come<br />

and unemployed residents. Moreover, <strong>the</strong> city’s economic condition relative to<br />

<strong>the</strong> region’s worsened: <strong>in</strong> 1989, <strong>the</strong> city’s median household <strong>in</strong>come equaled 65.8 percent<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>come <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> metro area; by 1999, that ratio had decl<strong>in</strong>ed to 63.7 percent. The city’s<br />

low average <strong>in</strong>come is due <strong>in</strong> part to chronically high unemployment. <strong>Buffalo</strong>’s<br />

unemployment rate was 13 percent <strong>in</strong> <strong>2000</strong>, about twice <strong>the</strong> metro rate and a percentage<br />

po<strong>in</strong>t higher than it was <strong>in</strong> <strong>1990</strong>. 5<br />

In summary, <strong>Buffalo</strong>’s <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> foreclosures took place <strong>in</strong> an environment <strong>of</strong><br />

slow growth but absent a significant economic stimulus. Still, whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>crease was<br />

attributable to local or national forces, it is not surpris<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>the</strong> effect would be more<br />

apparent <strong>in</strong> a city like <strong>Buffalo</strong>. Evidence suggests that <strong>the</strong> foreclosure process itself<br />

disproportionately affects low- and moderate-<strong>in</strong>come homeowners because <strong>the</strong>y lack <strong>the</strong><br />

resources to avert or forestall foreclosure. 6 Such homeowners clearly represent a<br />

considerable portion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Buffalo</strong> hous<strong>in</strong>g market.<br />

5 U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce, Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Census, <strong>1990</strong>, <strong>2000</strong>.<br />

6 Lauria, 1998.<br />

15<br />

01<br />

02<br />

8<br />

7<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!