07.06.2013 Views

Residential Foreclosures in the City of Buffalo, 1990-2000 - Federal ...

Residential Foreclosures in the City of Buffalo, 1990-2000 - Federal ...

Residential Foreclosures in the City of Buffalo, 1990-2000 - Federal ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

tracts. <strong>Foreclosures</strong> were clearly both more prevalent and more likely to occur <strong>in</strong> higher<br />

<strong>in</strong>come tracts than <strong>in</strong> lower <strong>in</strong>come ones.<br />

Table 4<br />

<strong>Foreclosures</strong> by Income Status and Change<br />

This f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g suggests that <strong>the</strong>re may be a tipp<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t beyond which <strong>the</strong><br />

correlation between <strong>in</strong>come change and foreclosure becomes significant (Table 4). In<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r words, it appears that rapid <strong>in</strong>come change is <strong>the</strong> important factor <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> association<br />

with foreclosure, ra<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>in</strong>come change alone. The relationship between foreclosure<br />

and <strong>in</strong>come change is not evident except <strong>in</strong> census tracts that experienced more than a 20<br />

percent decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> median household <strong>in</strong>come. These tracts had a foreclosure rate <strong>of</strong> 0.71<br />

percent. Thus, while foreclosure was more likely to occur <strong>in</strong> higher <strong>in</strong>come census tracts<br />

than <strong>in</strong> lower <strong>in</strong>come tracts, it was also more likely to occur <strong>in</strong> tracts that had experienced<br />

a significant decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>come than <strong>in</strong> tracts that had witnessed little or no change.<br />

<strong>Foreclosures</strong> by M<strong>in</strong>ority Status<br />

To observe <strong>the</strong> relationship between foreclosures and m<strong>in</strong>ority status, we categorize<br />

foreclosures <strong>in</strong> <strong>2000</strong> by m<strong>in</strong>ority concentrations based on census tracts. As noted, we<br />

consider all non-whites and whites <strong>of</strong> Hispanic orig<strong>in</strong> to be m<strong>in</strong>orities. A census tract is<br />

categorized as m<strong>in</strong>ority if more than 50 percent <strong>of</strong> its population falls under <strong>the</strong><br />

23<br />

Census<br />

Tracts <strong>Foreclosures</strong><br />

Foreclosure<br />

Rate<br />

(Percent) (1)<br />

Percentage <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Foreclosures</strong><br />

Income status and change<br />

Stable lower <strong>in</strong>come (< city median) 39 290 0.44 37<br />

Changed to lower <strong>in</strong>come 6 30 0.37 4<br />

Changed to higher <strong>in</strong>come (> city median) 4 7 0.38 1<br />

Stable higher <strong>in</strong>come 38 451 0.64 58<br />

Rate <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>come change<br />

Large decl<strong>in</strong>e (>20 percentage po<strong>in</strong>ts) 10 121 0.71 16<br />

Small decl<strong>in</strong>e (>10 to 20 percentage po<strong>in</strong>ts) 13 107 0.44 14<br />

No significant change (10 percentage po<strong>in</strong>ts) 17 77 0.40 10<br />

Sources: U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce, Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Census, "Census <strong>of</strong> Population and Hous<strong>in</strong>g;"<br />

<strong>Buffalo</strong> Law Journal; author's calculations.<br />

(1) The foreclosure rate is foreclosures per hous<strong>in</strong>g unit.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!