Residential Foreclosures in the City of Buffalo, 1990-2000 - Federal ...
Residential Foreclosures in the City of Buffalo, 1990-2000 - Federal ...
Residential Foreclosures in the City of Buffalo, 1990-2000 - Federal ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
short-tenure borrowers fac<strong>in</strong>g foreclosure <strong>in</strong> <strong>2000</strong>. However, like East Side, South<br />
<strong>Buffalo</strong>-River had an <strong>in</strong>ord<strong>in</strong>ate share <strong>of</strong> foreclosures on loans less than four years old at<br />
<strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> default. This relationship suggests that South <strong>Buffalo</strong>-River had a relatively<br />
large share <strong>of</strong> foreclosures on high-risk ref<strong>in</strong>ance loans to long-tenure homeowners. In<br />
<strong>2000</strong>, ref<strong>in</strong>ance loans made to long-tenure homeowners who defaulted <strong>in</strong> less than four<br />
years accounted for about a fifth <strong>of</strong> all foreclosures <strong>in</strong> that community.<br />
The relationship between owner tenure and foreclosures <strong>in</strong> <strong>2000</strong> also differs<br />
between <strong>the</strong> two communities with high foreclosure rates. Foreclosed borrowers <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
North East community were more likely to be short-tenure owners, while those <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
East Delavan community were more likely to be owners <strong>of</strong> long tenure. Both<br />
communities tended to have similar shares <strong>of</strong> foreclosures on young and old loans. Thus,<br />
foreclosures <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> North East community were more likely attributable to <strong>in</strong>-movers,<br />
while those <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> East Delavan community were more likely attributable to out-movers.<br />
Overall, owner tenure shows little relationship with <strong>the</strong> rate <strong>of</strong> foreclosure. Moreover, <strong>the</strong><br />
divergent patterns <strong>of</strong> foreclosure and owner tenure among communities fur<strong>the</strong>r suggest<br />
that <strong>the</strong> dynamics <strong>of</strong> foreclosure differ widely.<br />
II. Borrower Burden<br />
To clarify <strong>the</strong> relationship between borrower f<strong>in</strong>ancial condition and foreclosure, we<br />
exam<strong>in</strong>ed foreclosures <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> borrower debt. In particular, we looked at additional<br />
liens held aga<strong>in</strong>st borrowers. We also analyzed <strong>the</strong> overall burden faced at foreclosure:<br />
<strong>the</strong> judgment amount relative to <strong>the</strong> property’s value.<br />
Additional Liens<br />
Distressed homeowners <strong>of</strong>ten experience f<strong>in</strong>ancial burdens <strong>in</strong> addition to del<strong>in</strong>quent<br />
mortgages. To provide some measure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial situation <strong>of</strong> homeowners at <strong>the</strong> time<br />
<strong>of</strong> default, we analyzed foreclosures <strong>in</strong> <strong>2000</strong> to assess <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>cidence and nature <strong>of</strong><br />
additional lien holders. Such an analysis may shed light on <strong>the</strong> factors contribut<strong>in</strong>g to<br />
default. For example, medical liens suggest illness as a contribut<strong>in</strong>g factor, whereby a<br />
homeowner may at once be saddled with <strong>in</strong>creased expenses and dim<strong>in</strong>ished <strong>in</strong>come. By<br />
exam<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g additional liens, we also ga<strong>in</strong> an understand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> capacity <strong>of</strong> homeowners<br />
56