14.06.2013 Views

p-Tert-Butylphenol - UNEP Chemicals

p-Tert-Butylphenol - UNEP Chemicals

p-Tert-Butylphenol - UNEP Chemicals

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

OECD SIDS P-TERT-BUTYLPHENOL<br />

Ito et al. (1986) showed BHA enhanced forestomach carcinogenesis initiated in rats by N-methyl-<br />

N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine or N-methylnitrosourea (MNU) and enhanced urinary bladder<br />

carcinogenesis initiated by MNU or N-butyl-N-(4-hydroxybutyl)nitrosamine (BBN). BHT (2,6-bistert-butyl-methoxyphenol)<br />

(CAS 128-37-0) promoted urinary bladder carcinogenesis initiated by<br />

BBN or MNU and thyroid carcinogenesis initiated by MNU. Hirose et al. (1988) investigated<br />

promoting effects of phenolic compounds on N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG)initiated<br />

forestomach and glandular stomach carcinogenesis in male F344 rats. The incidence of<br />

squamous cell carcinoma of the forestomach in MNNG-treated animals was significantly elevated<br />

by catechol (2-hydroxyphenol) (CAS 120-80-9), TBMP and p-t-butylphenol.<br />

4.3 Initial Assessment for Human Health<br />

Acute toxicity of p-t-butylphenol is low via any administration routes. This chemical is considered<br />

as an irritant to the skin, eyes and respiratory tract. Animal experiment (OECD TG 406) indicated<br />

no skin sensitization but some positive results were reported in human patch tests. The<br />

depigmentation was observed on the skin of various animals and human exposed to this chemical.<br />

The depigmentation was observed on the skin of various animals and human exposed to this<br />

chemical. This change was likely induced by exposure to this chemical not only via direct contact but<br />

also via inhalation or ingestion route. In OECD combined repeat dose and<br />

reproductive/developmental screening toxicity test of rats by gavage, this chemical showed neither<br />

systemic toxicity nor reproductive toxicity even at the highest dose of 200 mg/kg/day. Although a<br />

noisy respiratory sound was induced in a few females at 200 mg/kg/day, it is considered due to<br />

irritation of this chemical to respiratory tract. In a dose-finding study (14 days), this became to<br />

respiratory difficulty, especially at 1,000 mg/kg/day. In other studies by the longer and higher<br />

exposure in diet, forestomach hyperplasia was induced. This chemical showed negative result in<br />

gene mutation test. In chromosomal aberration study, CHL/IU cells indicated structural<br />

chromosome aberration and polyploidy with metabolic activation although two other studies in rat<br />

lymphocytes and in rat liver epithelial-type cells showed negative results. As a two-stage<br />

carcinogenicity study indicated this chemical has promoting activity of forestomach carcinogenesis<br />

(papilloma and squamous carcinoma) in rats treated with N-methyl-N’-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine<br />

(MNNG), a carcinogenic potential of this chemical could not be ruled out. In transcriptional assay<br />

using transfected yeast, this chemical showed very weakly estrogenic activity.<br />

Occupational exposure<br />

p-t-<strong>Butylphenol</strong> is used as an intermediate in a closed system at industries, and workers wear<br />

protective gloves and respiratory protective equipments during operation in present time. The<br />

major exposure route is an inhalation and skin in limited workers. The daily intake through<br />

inhalation in occupational situation is calculated as 0.087 mg/kg/day as the worst case. As for<br />

systemic toxicity, occupational risk is presumably low because the margin of safety is 2.30 x 10 3 .<br />

However, many reports indicated depigmentation on skin occurred by occupational exposure.<br />

Therefore, irritation and sensitisation in addition to depigmentation on skin might be concerned to be<br />

risk at work place.<br />

Consumer exposure<br />

Consumer exposure is expected to be low because of its use pattern.<br />

Indirect exposure via environment<br />

As for indirect exposure via environment, PEClocal of 5.8 x 10 -3 mg/l from local exposure scenario<br />

was used for the estimation. The daily intake through drinking water or fish is calculated as 1.9 x<br />

10 -4 mg/kg/day or 1.0 x 10 -3 mg/kg/day. Therefore, health risk via environment is presumably low,<br />

<strong>UNEP</strong> Publications 81

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!