SAMPLING VEGETATION ATTRIBUTES - New Mexico NRCS - US ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

REFERENCES Floyd, D.A. and J.E. Anderson. 1983. A new point interception frame for estimating cover of vegetation. Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Radioecology and Ecology Programs 1983 Progress Report, pp. 107-113. ———. 1987. A comparison of three methods for estimating plant cover. Journal of Ecology 75: 229-245. Francis, Richard E., Richard S. Driscoll, and Jack N. Reppert. 1972. Loop-frequency as related to plant cover, herbage production, and plant density. U.S. Dept. of Agr., For. Ser., Rocky Mtn. For. and Range Exp. Sta., Ft. Collins, CO. Research Paper MA-94. 15 p. Freese, Frank. 1962. Elementary forest sampling. U.S. Dept. of Agr., For. Ser., Agr. Handbook No. 232. 91 p. ———. 1967. Elementary statistical methods for foresters. U.S. Dept. of Agr., For. Ser., Agr. Handbook No. 317. 87 p. Goldstein, R. 1989. Power and sample size via MS/PC-DOS computers. American Statistician 43:253-260. Goodall, D.W. 1952. Some considerations in the use of point quadrats for the analysis of vegetation. Aust. J. Sci. Res., Series B 5:1-41. Greig-Smith, P. 1983. Quantitative plant ecology. 3rd Ed. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA. Hanley, Thomas A. 1978. A comparison of the line-interception and quadrat estimation methods of determining shrub canopy coverage. J. Range Manage. 31:60-62. Hansen, Herbert C. 1962. Dictionary of ecology. Bonanza Books, Crown Publishers, Inc., New York. 382 p. Harniss, Roy 0. and Robert B. Murray. 1976. Reducing bias in dry leaf weight estimates of big sagebrush. Jr. Range Manage. 29:430-432. Hart, R.H. 1980. Determining a proper stocking rate for a grazing system. In: Proceedings, Grazing Management Systems for South West Rangelands Symposium, Range Improvement Task Force, New Mexico State Univ., Las Cruces, NM, pp.49-64. Heady, Harold F. 1961. Continuous vs. specialized grazing systems: a review and application to the California annual type. J. Range Manage. 14:182-193. Heintz, T.W., J.K. Lewis, and S.S. Waller. 1979. Low-level aerial photography as a management and research tool for range inventory. J. Range Manage. 32:247-249. Hewitt, George B., Ellis W. Huddleston, Robert J. Lavigne, Darrell N. Ueckert, and J. Gordon Watts. 1974. Rangeland entomology. Society for Range Management, Range Science Series No. 2. 127 p. 141
142 REFERENCES Hironaka, M. 1985. Frequency approaches to monitor rangeland vegetation. Symp. on use of frequency and for rangeland monitoring. William C. Krueger, Chairman. Proc., 38th Annual Meeting, Soc. for Range Manag. Feb. 1985. Salt Lake City, UT. Soc. for Range Manage. 84-86. Hyder, D.N., C.E. Conrad, P.T. Tueller, L.D. Calvin, C.E. Poulton, and F.A. Sneva. 1963. Frequency sampling of sagebrush-bunchgrass vegetation. Ecology 44:740-746. Hyder, D.N., R.E. Bement, E.E. Remmenga, and C. Terwilliger, Jr. 1965. Frequency sampling of blue grama range. J. Range Manage. 18:94-98. Hyder, D.N., R.E. Bement, and C. Terwilliger. 1966. Vegetation-soils and vegetationgrazing relations from frequency data. J. Range Manage. 19:11-17. Jardine, J.T. and Forsling, C.L. 1922. Range and cattle management during drought. USDA Bul. 1031, 84 p. Jasmer, Gerald E. and Jerry Holechek. 1984. Determining Grazing Intensity on Rangelands. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. 39(1):32-35. Jones, M.B. and R.A. Evans. 1959. Modification of the step-point method for evaluating species yield changes in fertilizer trials on annual grasslands. Agron. J. 51:467-470. Kennedy, K.A. and P.A. Addison. 1987. Some considerations for the use of visual estimates of plant cover in biomonitoring. J. Ecology 75: 151-157. Kinsinger, Floyd E., Richard E. Eckert, and Pat 0. Currie. 1960. A comparison of the lineinterception, variable-plot, and loop methods as used to measure shrub-crown cover. J. Range Manage. 13:17-21. Krebs, C.J. 1989. Ecological methodology. Harper & Row, New York, NY. Lapin, Lawrence L. 1993. Statistics for Modern Business Decisions. 6th Ed. Dryden Press, Orlando, FL. 1265p. Laycock, W.A. 1987. Setting Objectives and Picking Appropriate Methods for Monitoring Vegetation on Rangelands. Rangeland Monitoring Workshop Proceedings. U.S. Department of Interior. Bureau of Land Management. Golden, CO. Levy, E.B. and E.A. Madden. 1933. The Point Method for Pasture Analysis. New Zealand J. Agric. 46: 267-279. Lillesand, Thomas M. and Ralph Kiefer. 1979. Remote sensing and image interpretation. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY. 612 p. Lucas, H.A. and G.A.F. Seber. 1977. Estimating coverage and particle density using the line intercept method. Biometricka 64:618-622. Lund, H. Gyde and Elise McNutt. 1979. Integrating inventories: an annotated bibliography. U.S. Dept. of the Interior, BLM Tech Note No. 333. 183 p.
Page 1 and 2:
SAMPLING VEGETATION ATTRIBUTES INTE
Page 3 and 4:
TABLE OF CONTENTS SAMPLING VEGETATI
Page 5 and 6:
TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page 7 and 8:
I. PREFACE PREFACE The intent of th
Page 9 and 10:
2 INTRODUCTION values when individu
Page 11 and 12:
4 INTRODUCTION represent the “pul
Page 13 and 14:
6 INTRODUCTION G. Coordination Moni
Page 15 and 16:
8 STUDY DESIGN AND ANALYSIS A. Plan
Page 17 and 18:
10 STUDY DESIGN AND ANALYSIS Macrop
Page 19 and 20:
12 STUDY DESIGN AND ANALYSIS Becaus
Page 21 and 22:
14 STUDY DESIGN AND ANALYSIS d From
Page 23 and 24:
16 STUDY DESIGN AND ANALYSIS b Cove
Page 25 and 26:
18 STUDY DESIGN AND ANALYSIS sideoa
Page 27 and 28:
4 3.5 3 2.5 20 5 STUDY DESIGN AND A
Page 29 and 30:
22 STUDY DESIGN AND ANALYSIS C. Oth
Page 31 and 32:
24 ATTRIBUTES Frequency is the numb
Page 33 and 34:
26 ATTRIBUTES 2. Advantages and Lim
Page 35 and 36:
28 ATTRIBUTES b Standing crop and p
Page 37 and 38:
30 ATTRIBUTES
Page 39 and 40:
32 METHODS—Photographs c Angle ir
Page 41 and 42:
METHODS—Photographs Hinge Rod sta
Page 43 and 44:
METHODS—Photographs angle iron st
Page 45 and 46:
38 METHODS—Frequency • One tran
Page 47 and 48:
40 METHODS—Frequency transected,
Page 49 and 50:
42 METHODS—Frequency (3) Total fr
Page 51:
Page of Frequency 44 Study Number D
Page 55 and 56:
METHODS—Frequency The frame is ma
Page 57 and 58:
50 METHODS—Dry Weight Rank C. Dry
Page 59 and 60:
52 METHODS—Dry Weight Rank After
Page 62 and 63:
D. Daubenmire Method METHODS—Daub
Page 64 and 65:
METHODS—Daubenmire b Ten Cover Cl
Page 66:
Page of Daubenmire Study Number Dat
Page 70 and 71:
50 cm Six Cover Class Frame 20 cm R
Page 72 and 73:
METHODS—Line Intercept b Pilot St
Page 74 and 75:
METHODS—Line Intercept Hanley, Th
Page 77 and 78:
70 METHODS—Step Point F. Step-Poi
Page 79 and 80:
72 METHODS—Step Point the boot an
Page 81 and 82:
74 METHODS—Step Point measures AN
Page 85 and 86:
78 METHODS—Point Intercept G. Poi
Page 87 and 88:
80 METHODS—Point Intercept 8. Sam
Page 89 and 90:
82 METHODS—Point Intercept b Tran
Page 91 and 92:
METHODS—Point Intercept Examples
Page 93 and 94:
86 METHODS—Cover Board H. Cover B
Page 95 and 96:
88 METHODS—Cover Board g Study Do
Page 98: Page of Cover Board Method Profile
Page 101 and 102: 94 METHODS—Density I. Density Met
Page 103 and 104: 96 METHODS—Density (often very mu
Page 105 and 106: 98 METHODS—Density able to make s
Page 107: Page of Density Study Number Date E
Page 110 and 111: • Herbage Yield Tables for Trees
Page 112 and 113: METHODS—Double Weight Sampling (4
Page 114 and 115: METHODS—Double Weight Sampling d
Page 116: Page of Production Study Number Dat
Page 119 and 120: 112 METHODS—Harvest K. Harvest Me
Page 121 and 122: 114 METHODS—Harvest 7. Taking Pho
Page 123 and 124: 116 METHODS—Comparative Yield L.
Page 125 and 126: 118 METHODS—Comparative Yield (1)
Page 127 and 128: 120 METHODS—Comparative Yield Tab
Page 130 and 131: M. Visual Obstruction Method - Robe
Page 132 and 133: METHODS—Visual Obstruction—Robe
Page 134: Sampling Interval Study Location 1
Page 137 and 138: 130 METHODS—Other N. Other Method
Page 139 and 140: 132 GLOSSARY browse: (1) the part o
Page 141 and 142: 134 GLOSSARY grazable woodland: for
Page 143 and 144: 136 GLOSSARY sample: a set of sampl
Page 145 and 146: 138 GLOSSARY
Page 147: 140 REFERENCES Crocker, R.L. and N.
Page 151 and 152: 144 REFERENCES Nie, Norman H., C. H
Page 153 and 154: 146 REFERENCES Society for Range Ma
Page 155 and 156: 148 REFERENCES Whitman, W.C. and E.
Page 157: Location 150 APPENDIX A Study Locat
Page 160 and 161: APPENDIX B APPENDIX B—STUDY AND P
Page 162 and 163: APPENDIX B 3. Label 3 A placard on
Page 164 and 165: APPENDIX C Photo Identification Lab
Page 167 and 168: 160 APPENDIX C
Page 169 and 170: 162 APPENDIX D The formula for usin
Page 171: Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Pub
show all

SAMPLING VEGETATION ATTRIBUTES - New Mexico NRCS - US ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?