- Page 1: Helsinki University of Technology,
- Page 5: 5 PREFACE Illis quorum meruere labo
- Page 8 and 9: 8 3 THE OPERATIONAL SETTING .......
- Page 10 and 11: 10 6.4 The top-down view on EWSP ..
- Page 12 and 13: ABBREVIATION DESCRIPTION CCM Counte
- Page 14 and 15: ABBREVIATION DESCRIPTION 14 MMI Man
- Page 17 and 18: 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Incentive for th
- Page 19 and 20: 19 According to Regev [Reg01] a fun
- Page 21 and 22: 21 alternatives and their possible
- Page 23 and 24: 23 The second cornerstone for the p
- Page 25 and 26: 25 uninteresting to the layman. It
- Page 27 and 28: 27 and application of the whole as
- Page 29 and 30: 29 relevance to the holistic view.
- Page 31: 1.4.4 Organization of the present w
- Page 34 and 35: 34 The last objective, to “resolv
- Page 36 and 37: 36 of their usability (Table 1). Ho
- Page 38 and 39: 38 maps of the Axelrod type are use
- Page 40 and 41: 2.3.7 Forrester system dynamics 40
- Page 42 and 43: 42 its usefulness to the present wo
- Page 44 and 45: 44 When judging the models and simu
- Page 46 and 47: 46 reconnaissance role rotorcraft h
- Page 48 and 49: 48 popularity over Clausewitz’, g
- Page 50 and 51: 3.2.2 Helicopter operations and tac
- Page 52 and 53:
52 Weapon Take-off and landing Tran
- Page 54 and 55:
54 identification. Also, as a conse
- Page 56 and 57:
56 Traditional survivability thinki
- Page 58 and 59:
58 3.3.3 Additional considerations
- Page 60 and 61:
60 As a conclusion on the discussio
- Page 62 and 63:
3.4.2 Helicopter signatures 62 Tabl
- Page 64 and 65:
3.4.3 Background signatures 64 NATU
- Page 66 and 67:
3.4.5 Summary of phenomenology 66 T
- Page 68 and 69:
4.1.2 Non-terminal threat systems 6
- Page 70 and 71:
70 MBT to be the prominent killer o
- Page 72 and 73:
Missile system Spectral wavelength
- Page 74 and 75:
74 Aircraft rockets and guns Fixed-
- Page 76 and 77:
76 Weapons technology relies ever m
- Page 78 and 79:
78 alternatives is presented in App
- Page 80 and 81:
80 Laser technology and guidance La
- Page 82 and 83:
82 the attention had been on the S-
- Page 84 and 85:
84 4.2.5 Threat technology developm
- Page 86 and 87:
86 4.2.7 Conclusions and implicatio
- Page 88 and 89:
88 RWR issue Contemplation Threat s
- Page 90 and 91:
90 Laser warning receivers The chan
- Page 92 and 93:
92 guidance methods and classic ECM
- Page 94 and 95:
94 EO countermeasures Some ideas ha
- Page 96 and 97:
Examples: - AN/ALQ-144A (US) - L-16
- Page 98 and 99:
98 Development of countermeasures f
- Page 100 and 101:
100 countermeasures develop in para
- Page 102 and 103:
5.2 Support factors 5.2.1 Support f
- Page 104 and 105:
104 Figures 42 and 43 make it clear
- Page 106 and 107:
Strategic/operational intelligence
- Page 108 and 109:
108 fratricide, with one example be
- Page 110 and 111:
110 continues throughout the missio
- Page 112 and 113:
112 Platform installation is an eng
- Page 114 and 115:
114 requires that the helicopter wi
- Page 116 and 117:
116 M&S Ground tests OAR flight tes
- Page 118 and 119:
118 Platform installation requires
- Page 120 and 121:
120
- Page 122 and 123:
122 Figure 58 reviews earlier discu
- Page 124 and 125:
124 One approach to susceptibility
- Page 126 and 127:
126 Based on Figure 59, events last
- Page 128 and 129:
HIERARCHY LEVELS Level 7: Strategic
- Page 130 and 131:
130 6.5 Modeling the EWSP capabilit
- Page 132 and 133:
THREAT DEVELOPMENT DELAY threat dev
- Page 134 and 135:
6,000 3,000 0 Threats with CMs 134
- Page 136 and 137:
136 3. The model becomes generic wh
- Page 138 and 139:
138 6.6.2 Discussion on the Campaig
- Page 140 and 141:
140 The influence of EWSP is twofol
- Page 142 and 143:
142 Simulation Dynamic behavior Bas
- Page 144 and 145:
144 6.7 Modeling the EWSP mission l
- Page 146 and 147:
146 Figure 74: Text in figure. Figu
- Page 148 and 149:
148 3. Cost-benefit considerations
- Page 150 and 151:
150 In the next two simulations—S
- Page 152 and 153:
152 for simulations, but better dat
- Page 154 and 155:
154 By Definition 2 the survivabili
- Page 156 and 157:
156 and 58), without which EWSP can
- Page 158 and 159:
158 Chapters 3 through 5 are a syst
- Page 160 and 161:
160 In conclusion, the insight gain
- Page 162 and 163:
162 paradigm is the most viable alt
- Page 164 and 165:
164 when modeling different EWSP sy
- Page 166 and 167:
166 16. Ormondroyd, Richard, Profes
- Page 168 and 169:
168 Anon95a Anonymous: Additional P
- Page 170 and 171:
170 Bil02 Billingsley, D.: Choppers
- Page 172 and 173:
172 Col99 Colucci, F.: Smart Surviv
- Page 174 and 175:
174 Erw04 Erwin, S.: Army Rushes to
- Page 176 and 177:
176 Gol87 Golden, A. jr.: Radar Ele
- Page 178 and 179:
178 How90b Howell, G.T., McCord, J.
- Page 180 and 181:
180 Kra92 Krabbendam, A.J.: System
- Page 182 and 183:
182 Mil74 Miller, W.E. et al.: Beam
- Page 184 and 185:
184 Pol97 Polmar, N., Allen, T.B.:
- Page 186 and 187:
186 Ros03 Rosander, A.: Statusberä
- Page 188 and 189:
188 Ste98 Stevens, R. et al.: Syste
- Page 190 and 191:
190 Wil93b Wiley, R.G.: Electronic
- Page 192 and 193:
192 APPENDIX 1: AUXILIARY FIGURES A
- Page 194 and 195:
Details in Figure 1-1 Wavelength 10
- Page 196 and 197:
Sun: Strong emitter with approx. 60
- Page 198 and 199:
Target IR detector 1 2 198 Prism 1
- Page 200 and 201:
Separation from the aircraft Chaff
- Page 202 and 203:
202 Type Table 1-1: IR DETECTORS De
- Page 204 and 205:
204 Type Table 1-2b: SCANNING RF RE
- Page 206 and 207:
CVR IFM Superheterodyne Channelized
- Page 208 and 209:
208 Table 1-3: RADAR SELECTIVITY Se
- Page 210 and 211:
Appendix 1, References 210 Ald02 Al
- Page 212 and 213:
212 Sch86 Schleher, D.C.: Introduct
- Page 214 and 215:
214 Parameters used in the Capabili
- Page 216 and 217:
216 Parameter Value Motivation MAXI