electronic warfare self-protection of battlefield helicopters - Aaltodoc
electronic warfare self-protection of battlefield helicopters - Aaltodoc
electronic warfare self-protection of battlefield helicopters - Aaltodoc
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
22<br />
backup to the UN Mission in Ethiopia and Eritrea (UNMEE), decided that an<br />
integrated EWSP suite together with a new generation forward-looking infra-red<br />
(FLIR) cameras had first priority for improving the Apache [Jan01]. 12 The four<br />
Nordic countries that participated in the NSHP project all decided to outfit their<br />
transport <strong>helicopters</strong> with an EWSP suite. The UK has equipped both its Apache<br />
attack <strong>helicopters</strong> and Merlin transport <strong>helicopters</strong> with an indigenous EWSP suite.<br />
The European NH-90 and Tiger <strong>helicopters</strong> are both <strong>of</strong>fered with integrated EWSP<br />
suites. A major obstacle, however, is the patchwork <strong>of</strong> European countries that lack a<br />
joint approach to EWSP. Efforts by individual countries, e.g. in simulation, test and<br />
validation, and mission data file generation are repeated by other countries, and there<br />
are few indications <strong>of</strong> a systematic approach to EWSP <strong>of</strong> <strong>battlefield</strong> <strong>helicopters</strong>. The<br />
attitude on defense issues has been changing in Europe; particularly after the NATOled<br />
Kosovo operation in 1999 which highlighted European dependence on US<br />
military assistance. 13<br />
1.3 Objective <strong>of</strong> work<br />
1.3.1 The problem and the need for a solution<br />
The previous discussion indicates that a main concern <strong>of</strong> the EW community is the<br />
low propensity <strong>of</strong> decision-makers to invest in EWSP, and when investments are<br />
made they are made in a haphazard way, without real appreciation for conditions that<br />
would make EWSP an efficient contributor to platform survivability. On the other<br />
hand, the discussion also reveals that the EW community has problems in<br />
communicating its message to other interest groups and in understanding the position<br />
<strong>of</strong> other stakeholders in helicopter survivability. As a first cornerstone for the present<br />
work the following claims are made:<br />
Claims:<br />
1) There exists today no treatise on EWSP and its relation to<br />
<strong>battlefield</strong> helicopter survivability in general.<br />
2) The tools that exist today for communicating issues <strong>of</strong> EWSP<br />
with disparate stakeholders are insufficient.<br />
It should be noted that the claims refer to the unclassified and freely available body<br />
<strong>of</strong> scientific information. The discussion in Sections 1.4.1 and 1.4.2 indicates that<br />
some classified work has been done within this field, and it must also be assumed<br />
that various EW and combat simulation facilities take a holistic view on<br />
survivability.<br />
12 Despite this, it is obvious that only the Dutch decision to deploy the Apaches to Afghanistan<br />
trigged a crash-program for outfitting the <strong>helicopters</strong> with an EWSP suite [Jan04a, Jan04b, Fis04a].<br />
13 The weakness <strong>of</strong> Europe is expressed in the following statement: “Kosovo underlined the bad<br />
news. First, we lack sufficient strategic and tactical intelligence assets (….) Second, we lack sufficient<br />
strategic and tactical sea and air lift (….) Third, we lack enough hi-tech weapons (….) In effect,<br />
without the US today we cannot see very far, we cannot go very far, and when there, we cannot do<br />
very much and we are unlikely to be able to stay very long if we are not welcome” [Lin00].