27.06.2013 Views

electronic warfare self-protection of battlefield helicopters - Aaltodoc

electronic warfare self-protection of battlefield helicopters - Aaltodoc

electronic warfare self-protection of battlefield helicopters - Aaltodoc

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

45<br />

3 THE OPERATIONAL SETTING<br />

3.1 Helicopters and armed conflicts<br />

3.1.1 Development <strong>of</strong> <strong>battlefield</strong> <strong>helicopters</strong><br />

Helicopters have been used for military purposes since WW II. Knowingly the first<br />

attempt to arm <strong>helicopters</strong> was made by the Germans in 1944, when a machine gun<br />

was mounted in the nose <strong>of</strong> Fa-223 “Drache” <strong>helicopters</strong> [Eve83a]. Helicopters were<br />

used in counterinsurgency operations by the British in Malaya from 1950 onwards<br />

[All93 p.129, Dun88 p.12]. In the Korean War <strong>helicopters</strong> were used largely for<br />

search and rescue (SAR), combat SAR (CSAR), and casualty evacuation<br />

(CASEVAC); but also for transporting men and matériel [Dun88 p.10]. The French<br />

routinely armed <strong>helicopters</strong> during the 1954-1962 conflict in Algeria, and the<br />

dedicated attack helicopter made its debut when the AH-1G Huey Cobra entered<br />

service in Vietnam in 1967. [Koc00a, Thi00 pp.6-10, Tol73 p.144] The Vietnam War<br />

taught many valuable lessons, but at a cost <strong>of</strong> over 2,500 <strong>helicopters</strong> lost to enemy<br />

action [Gun98 p.170, Hal00 p.32]. Since the RAH-66 Comanche program was<br />

canceled early in 2004 the most original rotorcraft program today is the American<br />

V22 tilt-wing aircraft, which also is surrounded by controversy and delays. Another<br />

unique solution is the Russian Ka-50/52 coaxial-rotor helicopter, which has been<br />

delayed due to funding problems.<br />

3.1.2 Strengths <strong>of</strong> <strong>helicopters</strong><br />

Both transport and attack <strong>helicopters</strong> have characteristics that set them apart from<br />

fixed-wing aircraft. Howze [How79] argues for <strong>battlefield</strong> <strong>helicopters</strong> using<br />

experience from World War II: “As has been said a thousand times, there are two<br />

main elements <strong>of</strong> military strength in the land battle: mobility and firepower. We<br />

cannot be deficient in either, and nothing else—absolutely nothing else—affords the<br />

<strong>battlefield</strong> mobility <strong>of</strong> the helicopter”. Helicopters open more fully the third<br />

dimension—air—to army operations. The ability to <strong>self</strong>-deploy to a conflict area is<br />

also an advantage over e.g. the main battle tank (MBT). Attack <strong>helicopters</strong> cost less<br />

than fixed wing counterparts, they can operate without the infrastructure <strong>of</strong> an<br />

airfield, they can deploy forward with ground forces, and being dedicated to<br />

combined-arms ground battle mission they can be counted upon to provide support to<br />

ground troops whenever and wherever required [Kha99]. A strength <strong>of</strong> attack<br />

<strong>helicopters</strong> on the urban <strong>battlefield</strong> lies in their ability to use precision engagements<br />

to destroy selective targets with minimal collateral damages [Jon96]. In the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!