12.07.2013 Views

English - Global Environment Facility

English - Global Environment Facility

English - Global Environment Facility

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

GEF-4 Tracking Tool for Biodiversity Focal Area Strategic<br />

Objective One:<br />

Catalyzing Sustainability of Protected Area<br />

Issue Criteria Score: Tick only one box<br />

per question<br />

22. State and<br />

commercial neighbours<br />

Is there co-operation<br />

with adjacent land and<br />

water users?<br />

Process<br />

23. Indigenous people<br />

Do indigenous and<br />

traditional peoples<br />

resident or regularly<br />

using the protected area<br />

have input to<br />

management decisions?<br />

Process<br />

24. Local communities<br />

Do local communities<br />

resident or near the<br />

protected area have<br />

input to management<br />

There is no contact between managers and neighbouring official or corporate<br />

land and water users<br />

There is contact between managers and neighbouring official or corporate<br />

land and water users but little or no cooperation<br />

There is contact between managers and neighbouring official or corporate<br />

land and water users, but only some co-operation<br />

There is regular contact between managers and neighbouring official or<br />

corporate land and water users, and substantial co-operation on management<br />

Indigenous and traditional peoples have no input into decisions relating to the<br />

management of the protected area<br />

Indigenous and traditional peoples have some input into discussions relating<br />

to management but no direct role in management<br />

Indigenous and traditional peoples directly contribute to some relevant<br />

decisions relating to management but their involvement could be improved<br />

Indigenous and traditional peoples directly participate in all relevant decisions<br />

relating to management, e.g. co-management<br />

Local communities have no input into decisions relating to the management of<br />

the protected area<br />

Local communities have some input into discussions relating to management<br />

but no direct role in management<br />

Local communities directly contribute to some relevant decisions relating to<br />

management but their involvement could be improved<br />

26<br />

0<br />

1<br />

2 2<br />

3<br />

Comment/Explanation Next steps<br />

0 So much inside the protected<br />

area as in the buffer zone and of<br />

influence of the protected area,<br />

1<br />

it does not exist any established<br />

towns or native communities,<br />

nevertheless, natives exist and<br />

2 2 live in the communities of the<br />

coast in firm land, that just like<br />

they are all able in some<br />

3<br />

moments to make use of the<br />

resources of the protected area,<br />

whenever they are adjusted to<br />

the regulations of the area.<br />

Likewise, the same has spaces<br />

of consultation through the<br />

0<br />

diverse instances created for it.<br />

During the PMEMAP sessions<br />

(2009), in the Coiba NP, in spite of<br />

1<br />

the fact that the groups have a vote<br />

in the Counsel and Scientific<br />

2 2<br />

Committee and in the Committee<br />

of the special zone; they perceive

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!