English - Global Environment Facility
English - Global Environment Facility
English - Global Environment Facility
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
GEF-4 Tracking Tool for Biodiversity Focal Area Strategic<br />
Objective One:<br />
Catalyzing Sustainability of Protected Area<br />
Issue Criteria Score: Tick only one box<br />
per question<br />
22. State and<br />
commercial neighbours<br />
Is there co-operation<br />
with adjacent land and<br />
water users?<br />
Process<br />
23. Indigenous people<br />
Do indigenous and<br />
traditional peoples<br />
resident or regularly<br />
using the protected area<br />
have input to<br />
management decisions?<br />
Process<br />
24. Local communities<br />
Do local communities<br />
resident or near the<br />
protected area have<br />
input to management<br />
There is no contact between managers and neighbouring official or corporate<br />
land and water users<br />
There is contact between managers and neighbouring official or corporate<br />
land and water users but little or no cooperation<br />
There is contact between managers and neighbouring official or corporate<br />
land and water users, but only some co-operation<br />
There is regular contact between managers and neighbouring official or<br />
corporate land and water users, and substantial co-operation on management<br />
Indigenous and traditional peoples have no input into decisions relating to the<br />
management of the protected area<br />
Indigenous and traditional peoples have some input into discussions relating<br />
to management but no direct role in management<br />
Indigenous and traditional peoples directly contribute to some relevant<br />
decisions relating to management but their involvement could be improved<br />
Indigenous and traditional peoples directly participate in all relevant decisions<br />
relating to management, e.g. co-management<br />
Local communities have no input into decisions relating to the management of<br />
the protected area<br />
Local communities have some input into discussions relating to management<br />
but no direct role in management<br />
Local communities directly contribute to some relevant decisions relating to<br />
management but their involvement could be improved<br />
26<br />
0<br />
1<br />
2 2<br />
3<br />
Comment/Explanation Next steps<br />
0 So much inside the protected<br />
area as in the buffer zone and of<br />
influence of the protected area,<br />
1<br />
it does not exist any established<br />
towns or native communities,<br />
nevertheless, natives exist and<br />
2 2 live in the communities of the<br />
coast in firm land, that just like<br />
they are all able in some<br />
3<br />
moments to make use of the<br />
resources of the protected area,<br />
whenever they are adjusted to<br />
the regulations of the area.<br />
Likewise, the same has spaces<br />
of consultation through the<br />
0<br />
diverse instances created for it.<br />
During the PMEMAP sessions<br />
(2009), in the Coiba NP, in spite of<br />
1<br />
the fact that the groups have a vote<br />
in the Counsel and Scientific<br />
2 2<br />
Committee and in the Committee<br />
of the special zone; they perceive