12.07.2013 Views

English - Global Environment Facility

English - Global Environment Facility

English - Global Environment Facility

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

GEF-4 Tracking Tool for Biodiversity Focal Area Strategic Objective One:<br />

Catalyzing Sustainability of Protected Area Systems<br />

Issue Criteria Score: Tick only one box<br />

per question<br />

Is there co-operation<br />

with adjacent land and<br />

water users?<br />

Process<br />

23. Indigenous people<br />

Do indigenous and<br />

traditional peoples<br />

resident or regularly<br />

using the protected area<br />

have input to<br />

management decisions?<br />

Process<br />

24. Local communities<br />

Do local communities<br />

resident or near the<br />

protected area have<br />

input to management<br />

decisions?<br />

Process<br />

There is contact between managers and neighbouring official or corporate<br />

land and water users but little or no cooperation<br />

There is contact between managers and neighbouring official or corporate<br />

land and water users, but only some co-operation<br />

There is regular contact between managers and neighbouring official or<br />

corporate land and water users, and substantial co-operation on management<br />

Indigenous and traditional peoples have no input into decisions relating to the<br />

management of the protected area<br />

Indigenous and traditional peoples have some input into discussions relating<br />

to management but no direct role in management<br />

Indigenous and traditional peoples directly contribute to some relevant<br />

decisions relating to management but their involvement could be improved<br />

Indigenous and traditional peoples directly participate in all relevant decisions<br />

relating to management, e.g. co-management<br />

Local communities have no input into decisions relating to the management of<br />

the protected area<br />

Local communities have some input into discussions relating to management<br />

but no direct role in management<br />

Local communities directly contribute to some relevant decisions relating to<br />

management but their involvement could be improved<br />

Local communities directly participate in all relevant decisions relating to<br />

management, e.g. co-management<br />

Additional points Local communities/indigenous people<br />

24 a. Impact on<br />

communities<br />

24b. Impact on<br />

communities<br />

There is open communication and trust between local and/or indigenous<br />

people, stakeholders and protected area managers<br />

Programmes to enhance community welfare, while conserving protected area<br />

resources, are being implemented<br />

23<br />

1<br />

2 2<br />

3<br />

Comment/Explanation Next steps<br />

0 There is monitoring of the<br />

projects of CBMAP II in the<br />

communities of the zone of<br />

1 1 neighborhood: San Cristobal<br />

Island, Tigre Island and<br />

Marañón ravine<br />

2<br />

3<br />

0<br />

1<br />

2 2<br />

3<br />

+1 +1<br />

+1 +1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!