English - Global Environment Facility

More documents

Recommendations

Info

GEF-4 Tracking Tool for Biodiversity Focal Area Strategic Objective One: Catalyzing Sustainability of Protected Area Issue Criteria Score: Tick only one box per question Comment/Explanation Next steps rules well enough? The staff have excellent capacity/resources to enforce protected area 3 sufficient to monitor the area, legislation and regulations so they have to make great Input efforts to control illegal activities in the area. The protected area counts also with the support of the ecological police and the users of the Park. Issue Criteria Score: Tick only one box per question 4. Protected area objectives Is management undertaken according to agreed objectives? Planning 5. Protected area design Is the protected area the right size and shape to protect species, habitats, ecological processes and water catchments of key conservation concern? Planning 17 Comment/Explanation Next steps No firm objectives have been agreed for the protected area 0 The Soberanía NP management The protected area has agreed objectives, but is not managed according to 1 plan is a tool of support to the these objectives management of the park which The protected area has agreed objectives, but is only partially managed 2 establishes the objectives, norms according to these objectives and guidelines, possible uses The protected area has agreed objectives and is managed to meet these objectives 3 3 and strategies; to improve the common participation, the protection, conservation and sustainable management of the ecosystem and its zone of neighborhood. Inadequacies in protected area design mean achieving the major objectives of the protected area is very difficult Inadequacies in protected area design mean that achievement of major objectives is difficult but some mitigating actions are being taken (e.g. agreements with adjacent land owners for wildlife corridors or introduction of appropriate catchment management) Protected area design is not significantly constraining achievement of objectives, but could be improved (e.g. with respect to larger scale ecological processes) 0 1 2
GEF-4 Tracking Tool for Biodiversity Focal Area Strategic Objective One: Catalyzing Sustainability of Protected Area Issue Criteria Score: Tick only one box per question 6. Protected area boundary demarcation Is the boundary known and demarcated? Process Protected area design helps achievement of objectives; it is appropriate for species and habitat conservation; and maintains ecological processes such as surface and groundwater flows at a catchment scale, natural disturbance patterns etc The boundary of the protected area is not known by the management authority or local residents/neighbouring land users The boundary of the protected area is known by the management authority but is not known by local residents/neighbouring land users The boundary of the protected area is known by both the management authority and local residents/neighbouring land users but is not appropriately demarcated The boundary of the protected area is known by the management authority and local residents/neighbouring land users and is appropriately demarcated 18 3 3 0 1 2 3 3 Issue Criteria Score: Tick only one box per question 7. Management plan Is there a management plan and is it being implemented? Planning Additional points: Planning There is no management plan for the protected area A management plan is being prepared or has been prepared but is not being implemented A management plan exists but it is only being partially implemented because of funding constraints or other problems A management plan exists and is being implemented 3 3 Comment/Explanation Next steps Biological, economic, social information exists so much that support the planning and the take of decisions for the management of the area. Besides, the management plan, there is the plan of business and studies among others documents. Comment/Explanation Next steps 0 The management plan of the Soberanía NP has specific 1 activities established to carry out in a period of 5 years, with 2 the elaboration of the annual operating plans (POA), as well as, the responsible for their execution.
Page 2 and 3:
PART I: PROJECT INFORMATION GEFSEC
Page 4 and 5:
3. Strengthening of income generati
Page 6 and 7:
E. CONSULTANTS WORKING FOR TECHNICA
Page 8 and 9:
management effectiveness within nat
Page 10 and 11:
een identified among plants, amphib
Page 12 and 13:
trails, 103Km), only two PAs have a
Page 14 and 15:
array of natural, historical and cu
Page 16 and 17:
payments for environmental services
Page 18 and 19:
the International Park “La Amista
Page 20 and 21:
egulatory framework for mainstreami
Page 22 and 23:
of coastal and marine resources. Th
Page 24 and 25:
F. DISCUSS THE VALUE-ADDED OF GEF I
Page 26 and 27:
5. In summary, the incremental reas
Page 28 and 29:
c. Creating the conditions for up-s
Page 30 and 31:
PART IV: EXPLAIN THE ALIGNMENT OF P
Page 32 and 33:
ANNEX A: PROJECT RESULTS FRAMEWORK
Page 34 and 35:
Matrix of Indicators Component 1 Ba
Page 36 and 37:
Component 2 Base Year 1 Year 2 Year
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
February 23, 2009 Please ensure coo
Page 44 and 45:
Title of the Position $/ Estimat We
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Diagnostic of existing ecotourism s
Page 52 and 53:
ANNEX E: Ecotourism resources and p
Page 54 and 55:
Name of Protected Area Resources wi
Page 56 and 57:
Name of Protected Area PN Chagres -
Page 58 and 59:
ANNEX F: SINAP AND PRIORITY PROTECT
Page 60 and 61:
-iii- CONTENT PROJECT SUMMARY .....
Page 62 and 63:
-v- PROJECT SUMMARY PANAMA ABREVIAT
Page 64 and 65:
A. Background - 2 - I. DESCRIPTION
Page 66 and 67:
- 4 - hectare in SINAP is about hal
Page 68 and 69:
- 6 - infrastructure, technology an
Page 70 and 71:
- 8 - carrying capacity 6 , flow ma
Page 72 and 73:
- 10 - # of PA with linked biologic
Page 74 and 75:
C. Fiduciary Risk - 12 - 2.7 Based
Page 76 and 77:
2. Coordination - 14 - 3.3 A Steeri
Page 78 and 79:
GEF-4 Tracking Tool for Biodiversit
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
3 GEF-4 Tracking Tool for Biodivers
Page 84 and 85:
Coiba National Park No 256,195 ha a
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Annual budget (US$) - excluding sta
Page 90 and 91:
Protected Areas Threats: Data Sheet
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
. Management Objective 1 GEF-4 Trac
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Strategic Programs for GEF-4 under
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
La Amistad International Park Altos
Page 140 and 141:
Soberania National Park Baru Volcan
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181:
Page 182 and 183:
Page 184 and 185:
Page 186 and 187:
Page 188 and 189:
Page 190 and 191:
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199:
Including: (tick boxes) GEF-4 Track
Page 200 and 201:
Page 202 and 203:
Page 204 and 205:
Page 206 and 207:
Page 208 and 209:
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212 and 213:
Page 214 and 215:
Page 216 and 217:
Page 218 and 219:
Page 220 and 221:
Page 222 and 223:
Page 224 and 225:
What are the main values for which
Page 226 and 227:
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230 and 231:
Page 232 and 233:
Page 234 and 235:
Page 236 and 237:
Page 238 and 239:
Page 240 and 241:
Page 242 and 243:
Page 244 and 245:
Page 246 and 247:
Strategic Programs for GEF-4 under
Page 248 and 249:
Page 250 and 251:
La Amistad International Park Altos
Page 252 and 253:
Soberania National Park Baru Volcan
Page 254 and 255:
Page 256 and 257:
Page 258 and 259:
Page 260 and 261:
Page 262 and 263:
Page 264 and 265:
Page 266 and 267:
Page 268 and 269:
Page 270 and 271:
Page 272 and 273: GEF-4 Tracking Tool for Biodiversit
Page 278 and 279: 3 GEF-4 Tracking Tool for Biodivers
Page 280 and 281: Coiba National Park No 256,195 ha a
Page 310 and 311: 3 GEF-4 Tracking Tool for Biodivers
Page 312 and 313: Coiba National Park No 256,195 ha a
Page 320 and 321: 7. Natural system modifications GEF
Page 338 and 339: 2 registered: number of individuals
Page 340 and 341: 4 project year, which will summariz
Page 342 and 343: 6 1.18 The Project may be asked to
Page 344: 8 Independent Mid-Term Evaluation I
show all

English - Global Environment Facility

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?