13.07.2013 Views

Allelochemicals Biologica... - Name

Allelochemicals Biologica... - Name

Allelochemicals Biologica... - Name

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

58<br />

ANA LUISA ANAYA<br />

is lacking. To test this hypothesis, cucumber seedlings were grown in soil containing<br />

various concentrations of wheat or sunflower tissue. Both tissue types contain phenolic<br />

acids, which have been implicated as allelopathic phytotoxins. The level of<br />

phytotoxicity of the plant tissues was determined by the inhibition of pigweed seedling<br />

emergence and cucumber seedling leaf area expansion. The stimulation of cucumber<br />

seedling rhizosphere bacterial communities was determined by the plate dilution<br />

frequency technique using a medium containing phenolic acids as the sole carbon<br />

source. When sunflower tissue was incorporated into autoclaved soil (to reduce the<br />

initial microbial populations), a simultaneous inhibition of cucumber seedling growth<br />

and stimulation of the community of phenolic acid utilizing rhizosphere bacteria<br />

occurred. Thus, it was possible to observe simultaneous inhibition of cucumber<br />

seedlings and stimulation of phenolic acid utilizing rhizosphere bacteria, and therefore<br />

provide indirect evidence of phenolic acid transfer from plant residues in the soil to<br />

the root surface. However, the simultaneous responses were not sufficiently consistent<br />

to be used as a field screening tool but were dependent upon the levels of phenolic<br />

acids and the bulk soil and rhizosphere microbial populations present in the soil. It is<br />

possible that this screening procedure may be useful for phytotoxins that are more<br />

unique than phenolic acids. Such an inverse relationship between phytotoxicity and<br />

the response of rhizosphere bacterial populations was also observed by Blum et al.<br />

(2000), and such interactions provide indirect evidence for the transfer of<br />

allelochemicals from the plant root to the rhizosphere.<br />

In relation with resistance of weeds to herbicides, Duke et al. (2000) mentioned<br />

that new mechanisms of action for herbicides are highly desirable to fight evolution<br />

of resistance in weeds, to create or exploit unique market niches, and to cope with<br />

new regulatory legislation. Comparison of the known molecular target sites of synthetic<br />

herbicides and natural phytotoxins reveals that there is little redundancy. Comparatively<br />

little effort has been expended on determination of the sites of action of phytotoxins<br />

from natural sources, suggesting that intensive study of these molecules will reveal<br />

many more novel mechanisms of action. These authors gave some examples of natural<br />

products that inhibit unexploited steps in the amino acid, nucleic acid, and other<br />

biosynthetic pathways: AAL-toxin, hydantocidin, and various plant-derived terpenoids.<br />

Natural products have not been utilized as extensively for weed management as<br />

they have been for insect and plant pathogen management, but there are several notable<br />

successes such as glufosinate and the natural product-derived triketone herbicides.<br />

The molecular target sites of these compounds are often unique. Strategies for the<br />

discovery of these materials and compounds are outlined by Duke et al. (2002a).<br />

Numerous examples of individual phytotoxins and crude preparations with weed<br />

management potential are provided by these authors. They described an example of<br />

research to find a natural product solution of a unique pest management problem<br />

(blue-green algae in aquaculture), and mentioned the two fundamental approaches to<br />

the use of natural products for weed management: i) as a herbicide or a lead for a<br />

synthetic herbicide and ii) use in allelopathic crops or cover crops (Duke et al., 2002b).<br />

As it was mentioned, crops may be genetically engineered for weed management<br />

purposes by making them more resistant to herbicides or by improving their ability to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!