13.07.2013 Views

Allelochemicals Biologica... - Name

Allelochemicals Biologica... - Name

Allelochemicals Biologica... - Name

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

BACTERIAL ROOT ZONE COMMUNITIES, BENEFICIAL ALLELOPATHIES AND PLANT DISEASE CONTROL<br />

inundative insertion of a non-indigenous species. Consequently, both pathogen and<br />

biocontrol agent are inhibited in collateral fashion and to various degrees; a scenario<br />

that is congruent with the defensive mutualism theory proposed by Clay (1988).<br />

4.3. Modifying Soil Agro-ecosystems<br />

The extent to which producers can develop beneficial root zone allelopathies amongst<br />

microbial communities will depend largely upon the resilience of the soil in question<br />

(Szabolcs, 1994) and the type of crop management and tillage systems being practised<br />

(Sturz and Christie, 2003). Plant species are known to apply a selective and specific<br />

influence on microbial diversity in the rhizosphere through their differential root<br />

exudate spectra (Grayston et al., 1998), and the plastic nature of the relationship<br />

between resident microbial communities. Thus the level of disease suppressiveness in<br />

a soil is eminently amenable to deformation through the use of selected cultural<br />

practices. This regardless of the inherent capacity of ‘natural’ soil microbial ecosystems<br />

to buffer anthropogenic interference.<br />

Crop management systems are regularly used to distort agro-ecosystems through,<br />

for example, the use of tillage operations, alternate cropping systems, monoculture,<br />

crop rotation length, fertilizer and organic amendments, and various crop protection<br />

chemistries. The management of soil microbial communities for crop yield<br />

maximization appears to involve, in part, the creation of short term chaos in the<br />

microbial community through the application of a plethora of perturbation stresses<br />

(Odum et al., 1979). Moderate levels of ‘input perturbation’ are considered to improve<br />

ecosystem performance, while higher levels of perturbation stress result in performance<br />

loss.<br />

Input perturbations have commonly been used to modify soil microbial agroecosystems<br />

at the expense of pathogen populations. The subsequent variation in<br />

habitat and increase in niche heterogeneity - though on a microscale and at multiple<br />

sites along the root - is believed to encourage microbial biodiversity and consequently<br />

increase the potential for root zone competition (Smucker, 1993; Andrews and Harris,<br />

2000). Thus, for example, increasing soil acidity (Davis and Callihan, 1974, Sturz et<br />

al., 2003), applying irrigation soon after tuber initiation (Lapwood et al., 1973;<br />

Oestergaard and Nielsen, 1979) and the addition of soil amendments, green manures<br />

and mulches (Tremblay and Beauchamp, 1998) have all been relatively successful in<br />

reducing the development common scab on potatoes.<br />

Disease suppression has also been achieved against a wide range of pathogens by<br />

incorporating green manures (plough-down crops) (Tu and Findlay, 1986), animal<br />

manures (Gorodecki and Hadar, 1990) and composts (including organic solid wastes)<br />

(Nelson and Hoitink, 1983; Cohen et al., 1998) into field soils. All these amendments<br />

can encourage aggressive competition among microbial communities (Hoitink and<br />

Boehm, 1999; Hoitink and Fahy, 1986; Hoitink et al., 1997), with the added effect<br />

that manure and compost decomposition can release both volatile and non-volatile<br />

toxic compounds that inhibit phytopathogenic nematodes (Sayre et al., 1965; Abawi<br />

133

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!