13.07.2013 Views

Allelochemicals Biologica... - Name

Allelochemicals Biologica... - Name

Allelochemicals Biologica... - Name

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE ALLELOPATHIC POTENTIAL OF GINSENOSIDES 165<br />

pathogens, are ascomycetes. The activity of ginsenosides against these pathogens, as<br />

well as saprotrophic Trichoderma spp., was evaluated in vitro (Nicol et al., 2002;<br />

unpublished data). The Trichoderma spp. are potential antagonists towards soilborne<br />

pathogens, evident by the greater levels of Trichoderma spp. found in healthy ginseng<br />

fields than in replanted ginseng fields with high disease incidence (Shin and Lee,<br />

1986). In vitro anti-fungal bioassays were completed by adding ginsenosides to growth<br />

media and comparing the relative growth to that of controls (i.e., with no ginsenoside<br />

addition to the growth media). Under these conditions, the growth of six of the nine<br />

tested organisms was inhibited. The highest growth inhibition was observed in the<br />

saprotrophs T. harzianum and T. hamatum followed by the leaf pathogen A. panax<br />

and T. viride (Table 1).<br />

Table 1. Growth Response of Selected Fungal and Oomycotan Species to<br />

Ginsenosides. The relative growth of the microorganisms was compared in vitro with<br />

and without the addition of ginsenosides isolated from Panax quinquefolius roots.<br />

Growth was standardized to that of controls (i.e., no ginsenosides added) to allow<br />

comparisons across species, even though different assay conditions were used for<br />

different organisms. Growth data is shown as a mean ± standard deviation. With the<br />

exception of F. oxysporum, the growth of all organisms in the presence of ginsenosides<br />

was significantly different from the mean growth of the respective controls (data not<br />

shown). Data compiled from Nicol et al. 2002, 2003 and unpublished data.<br />

Fungal Species % Growth relative to control<br />

Trichoderma harzianum -26.4 ± 0.9<br />

Trichoderma hamatum -22.2 ± 2.8<br />

Trichoderma viride -9.4 ± 1.1<br />

Alternaria panax -17.1 ± 3.8<br />

Fusarium solani -3.3 ± 0.6<br />

Fusarium oxysporum -3.0 ± 0.8<br />

Cylindrocarpon destructans +7.6 ± 2.9<br />

Phytophthora cactorum +324.9 ± 1.0<br />

Pythium irregulare +392.8 ± 0.5<br />

The growth of the two Fusarium species, F. oxysporum and F. solani, was consistently<br />

found to be slightly lower, but not always significantly different from control<br />

(Table 1). Conversely, the growth of the causal organisms of some of the most devastating<br />

diseases in the North American ginseng industry (i.e., C. destructans, P.<br />

cactorum and Py. irregulare) was significantly stimulated over that of control. When<br />

analysed as a group, significantly different growth responses to the ginsenosides were<br />

observed across the fungal and oomycotan species tested (Table 1). That is, the organisms<br />

tested were generally inhibited (Trichoderma spp. and A. panax), unaffected<br />

(Fusarium spp.) or stimulated (C. destructans, P. cactorum and Py. irregulare) by<br />

ginseng saponins. By comparison, greater antifungal activity was found with aescin,<br />

a mixture of saponins from the horse chestnut tree (Nicol et al. 2002) and consequently,<br />

ginsenosides can only be considered to be mildly antifungal.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!